Map quality for ordinary kriging and inverse distance weighted interpolation

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 2042-2047

  Mueller, T G ^a   Pusuluri, N B ^a   Mathias, K K ^a   Cornelius, P L ^a   Barnhisel, R I ^a   Shearer, S A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS; INTERPOLATION; MAPPING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SAMPLING;

INVERSE DISTANCE WEIGHTED (IDW); KRIGING; SOIL FERTILITY MAPS;

SOILS;

KRIGING; MAPPING; PH; SOIL SURVEY;

EID: 8644252040     PISSN: 03615995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.2042     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Cressie, N. 1993. Statistics for spatial data. Revised ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
2. Dalthorp, D., J. Nyrop, and M. Villani. 1999. Estimation of local mean population densities of Japanese beetle grubs (Scarabaeidae: Coleoptera). Environ. Entomol. Apr. 28:255-265.
3. Gotway, C.A., R.B. Ferguson, G.W. Hergert, and T.A. Peterson. 1996. Comparison of kriging and inverse-distance methods for mapping soil parameters. Soil Sci. Soc. Am J. 60:1237-1247.
4. Goovaerts, P. 1997. Geostatistics for natural resource evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York.
5. Hosseini, E., J. Gallichand, and D. Marcotte. 1994. Theoretical and experimental performance of spatial interpolation methods for soil salinity analysis. Trans. ASAE. 37:1799-1807.
6. Isaaks, E., and R. Srivastava. 1989. An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
7. Kollias, V.J., D.P. Kalivas, and N.J. Yassoglou. 1999. Mapping the soil resources of a recent alluvial plain in Greece using fuzzy sets in a GIS environment. J. Soil Sci. 50:261-273.
8. Kravchenko, A.N. 2003. Influence of spatial structure on accuracy of interpolation methods. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:1564-1571.
9. Kravchenko, A., and D.G. Bullock. 1999. A comparative study of interpolation methods for mapping soil properties. Agron. J. 91: 393-400.
10. Lapen, D.R., and H.N. Hayhoe. 2003. Spatial analysis of seasonal and annual temperature and precipitation normals in southern Ontario, Canada. J. Great Lakes Res. 29:529-544.
11. Laslett, G.M., A.B. McBratney, P.J. Pahl, and M.F. Hutchinson. 1987. Comparison of several spatial prediction methods for soil pH. J. Soil Sci. 38:325-341.
12. Mueller, T.G., F.J. Pierce, O. Schabenberger, and D.D. Warncke. 2001. Map quality for site-specific fertility management. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65:1547-1558.
13. Mueller, T.G., N.B. Pusuluri, K.K. Mathias, P.L. Cornelius, and R.I. Barnhisel. 2004. Site-specific fertility management: A model for predicting map quality. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. (this issue) 68:2031-2041.
14. Nalder, I.A., and Ross W. Wein. 1998. Spatial interpolation of climatic normals: Test of a new method in the Canadian boreal forest. Agric. Forest Meteor. 92:211-225.
15. Pannatier, Y. 1996. Variowin: Software for spatial data analysis in 2D Springer, New York.
16. Schabenberger, O., and F.J. Pierce. 2002. Contemporary statistical models for the plant and soil sciences. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL.
17. Schloeder, C.A., N.E. Zimmerman, and M.J. Jacobs. 2001. Comparison of methods for interpolating soil properties using limited data. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65:470-479.
18. Tabios, G.Q., and J.D. Salas. 1985. A comparative analysis of techniques for spatial interpolation of precipitation. Water Resour. Bull. 21:365-380.
19. University of Kentucky. 2003. Soil testing methods [Online]. Available at http://soils.rs.uky.edu/newpage1.htm [update 20 May 2004; verified 29 July 2004] Division of regulatory services, Lexington, KY.
20. Wartenburg, D., C. Uchrin, and P. Coogan. 1991. Estimating exposure using kriging: A simulation study. Environ. Health Perspect. 94:75-82.
21. Weber, D., and E. Englund. 1992. Evaluation and comparison of spatial interpolators. Math. Geol. 24:381-391.
22. Weisz, R., S. Fleischer, and Z. Smilowitz. 1995. Map generation in high-value Horticultural Integrated Pest Management: Appropriate Interpolation Methods for Site- specific pest management of Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 88:1650-1657.