Discrete choice as a method for exploring education preferences in a Danish population of patients with type 2 diabetes

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 87, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 217-225

  Schiøtz, Michaela ^a   Bøgelund, Mette ^b   Almdal, Thomas ^a   Willaing, Ingrid ^a  

^a STENO DIABETES CENTER   (Denmark)

^b Incentive Partners ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

HbA1c levels; Patient education; Patient satisfaction; Type 2 diabetes; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; COMORBIDITY; COMPETENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DANISH; DIABETES CONTROL; DIABETIC PATIENT; DISEASE DURATION; EATING HABIT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHNIC GROUP; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE MODIFICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DENMARK; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 84860384779     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Global guideline for type 2 diabetes 2005, International Diabetes Federation, Brussels.
2. National Institute for Health Clinical Excellence Commissioning guide: implementing NICE guidance: patient education programme for people with type 2 diabetes 2008, National Health Service, London.
3. Funnell M.M., Brown T.L., Childs B.P., Haas L.B., Hosey G.M., Jensen B., et al. National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care 2008, 31:S97-S104.
4. Brennan P.F., Strombom I. Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: the role of computer technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998, 5:257-262.
5. Cooper H., Booth K., Fear S., Gill G. Chronic disease patient education: lessons from meta-analyses. Patient Educ Couns 2001, 44:107-117.
6. Funnell M.M., Anderson R.M. Empowerment and self-management of diabetes. Clin Diabetes 2004, 22:123-127.
7. Skinner T.C., Carey M.E., Cradock S., Dallosso H.M., Daly H., Davies M.J., et al. 'Educator talk' and patient change: some insights from the DESMOND (Diabetes Education and Self Management for Ongoing and Newly Diagnosed) randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med 2008, 1117-1120.
8. Cooper H.C., Booth K., Gill G. Patients' perspectives on diabetes health care education. Health Educ Res 2003, 18:191-206.
9. Ockleford E., Shaw R.L., Willars J., Dixon-Woods M. Education and self-management for people newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study of patients' views. Chronic Illn 2008, 4:28-37.
10. Morris S., Devlin N., Parkin D. Measuring and valuing health care output. Economic analysis in health care 2007, 265-304. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex. S. Morris, N. Devlin, D. Parkin (Eds.).
11. Ryan M., Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2003, 2:55-64.
12. Ryan M., Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. Brit Med J 2000, 320:1530-1533.
13. Jendle J., Torffvit O., Ridderstrale M., Lammert M., Ericsson A., Bogelund M. Willingness to pay for health improvements associated with anti-diabetes treatments for people with type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin 2010, 26:917-923.
14. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Economics of non-market goods and resources series 2008, vol. 11. Springer, Dordrecht. M. Ryan, K. Gerard, M. Amaya-Amaya (Eds.).
15. Kuhfeld W.F. Marketing research methods in SAS 2010, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
16. Ryan M., Hughes J. Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. Health Econ 1997, 6:261-273.
17. Barker N. A practical introduction to the bootstrap using the SAS system 2005, Oxford Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wallingford.
18. Kjaer T., Gyrd-Hansen D., Willaing I. Investigating patients' preferences for cardiac rehabilitation in Denmark. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2006, 22:211-218.
19. Funnell M.M., Nwankwo R., Gillard M.L., Anderson R.M., Tang T.S. Implementing an empowerment-based diabetes self-management education program. Diabetes Educ 2005, 31. 53, 55, 56, 61.
20. Bodenheimer T., Wagner E.H., Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. J Am Med Assoc 2002, 288:1775-1779.
21. Tu H.T., Hargroves L. Seeking health care information: most consumers on the sidelines. Issue brief no. 61 2003, Center for Studying Health System Change, Washington, DC.
22. Bastiaens H., Van R.P., Pavlic D.R., Raposo V., Baker R. Older people's preferences for involvement in their own care: a qualitative study in primary health care in 11 European countries. Patient Educ Couns 2007, 68:33-42.
23. Ekdahl A.W., Andersson L., Friedrichsen M. They do what they think is the best for me. Frail elderly patients' preferences for participation in their care during hospitalization. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 80:233-240.
24. Rodriguez K.L., Appelt C.J., Switzer G.E., Sonel A.F., Arnold R.M. They diagnosed bad heart: a qualitative exploration of patients' knowledge about and experiences with heart failure. Heart Lung 2008, 37:257-265.
25. Institute of Medicine Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century 2001, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
26. Kaplan S.H., Greenfield S., Ware J.E. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care 1989, 27:S110-S127.
27. Epstein R.M., Franks P., Fiscella K., Shields C.G., Meldrum S.C., Kravitz R.L., et al. Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med 2005, 61:1516-1528.
28. Laine C., Davidoff F. Patient-centered medicine. A professional evolution. J Amer Med Assoc 1996, 275:152-156.
29. Anderson R.M., Funnell M.M. Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm. Patient Educ Couns 2005, 57:153-157.
30. Altenhoener T., Leppin A., Grande G., Romppel M. Social inequality in patients' physical and psychological state and participation in rehabilitation after myocardial infarction in Germany. Int J Rehabil Res 2005, 28:251-257.