"They do what they think is the best for me." Frail elderly patients' preferences for participation in their care during hospitalization

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 233-240

  Ekdahl, Anne W ^a,b   Andersson, Lars ^b   Friedrichsen, Maria ^b,c  

^a VRINNEVI HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c Palliative Education and Research Center   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Content analysis; Frail elderly; Hospitalization; Patient participation; Semi structured interviews

Indexed keywords

AGED; AGED HOSPITAL PATIENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CONTENT ANALYSIS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; FRAIL ELDERLY; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; DECISION MAKING; HOSPITALIZATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGY; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FRAIL ELDERLY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 77954310707     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.026     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Frosch D.L., Kaplan R.M. Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions. Am J Prev Med 1999, 17:285-294.
2. Health care legislation in Sweden (1982:763) 1982-06-30, Omtryck: SFS 1992:567 Uppdaterad: t.o.m. SFS 2007:403, ed: Rixlex, 1982, http://www.notisum.se/rnp/sls/lag/19820763.htm%23P2_a.
3. World Heath Organization A declaration on the promotion of patients' rights in Europe 1994, Amsterdam,. http://www.who.int/genomics/public/eu_declaration1994.pdf.
4. Greenfield S., Kaplan S., Ware J.E. Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med 1985, 4:520-528.
5. Maly R.C., Bourque L.B., Engelhardt R.F. A randomized controlled trial of facilitating information given to patients with chronic medical conditions: effects on outcomes of care. J Fam Pract 1999, 48:356-363.
6. Arnetz J.E., Winblad U., Arnetz B.B., Höglund A.T. Physicians' and nurses' perceptions of patient involvement in myocardial infarction care. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2008, 7:113-120.
7. Bruera E., Sweeney C., Calder K., Palmer L., Benisch-Tolley S. Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. J Clin Oncol 2001, 19:2883-2885.
8. Degner L.F., Sloan J.A. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play?. J Clin Epidemiol 1992, 45:941-950.
9. Janz N.K., Wren P.A., Copeland L.A., Lowery J.C., Goldfarb S.L., Wilkins E.G. Patient-physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. J Clin Oncol 2004, 22:3091-3098.
10. Montgomery A.A., Fahey T. How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians?. Qual Health Care 2001, 10:i39-i43.
11. Murray E., Pollack L., White M., Lo B. Clinical decision-making: physicians' preferences and experiences. BMC Fam Pract 2007, 8:10.
12. Levinson W., Kao A., Kuby A., Thisted R.A. Not all patients want to participate in decision-making. J Gen Int Med 2005, 20:531-535.
13. Schneider A., Körner T., Mehring M., Wensing M., Elwyn G., Szecsenyi J. Impact of age, health locus of control and psychological co-morbidity on patients' preferences for shared decision making in general practice. Patient Educ Couns 2006, 61:292-298.
14. van den Brink-Muinen A., van Dulmen S., de Haes H. Has patients' involvement in the decision-making process changed over time?. Health Expectations 2006, 9:333-342.
15. Sainio C., Lauri S., Eriksson E. Cancer patients' views and experiences of participation in care and decision making. Nurs Ethics 2001, 8:97-113.
16. Wallberg B. Information needs and preferences for participation in treatment decisions among Swedish breast cancer patients. Acta Oncol 2000, 39:467-476.
17. Heyland D.K., Tranmer J., O'Callaghan C.J., Gafni A. The seriously ill hospitalized patient: preferred role in end-of-life decision making?. J Crit Care 2003, 18:3-10.
18. Benbassat J., Pilpel D., Tidhar M. Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys. Behav Med 1998, 24:81-88.
19. Frewer L.J., Salter B., Lambert N. Understanding patients' preferences for treatment: the need for innovative methodologies. Qual Health Care 2001, 10:i50-i54.
20. Harvey R.M., Kazis L., Lee A.F.S. Decision-making preference and opportunity in VA ambulatory care patients: association with patient satisfaction. Res Nurs Health 1999, 22:39-48.
21. Whelan T., Sawka C., Levine M., Gafni A., Reyno L., Willan A. Helping patients make informed choices: a randomized trial of a decision aid for adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003, 95:581-587.
22. Wetzels R., Harmsen M., Van Weel C., Grol R., Michel W. Interventions for improving older patients' involvement in primary care episodes. 2007. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007.
23. Elkin E.B., Kim S.H.M., Casper E.S., Casper E.S., Kissane D.W., Schrag D. Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions. J Clin Oncol 2007, 25:5275-5280.
24. Abellan van Kan G., Rolland Y., Bergman H., Morley J.E., Kritchevsky S.B., Vellas B. The I.A.N.A. task force on frailty assessment of older people in clinical practice. J Nutr Health Aging 2008, 12:29-37.
25. Gurner U., Thorslund M. Holistic perspective is needed in care of multiimpaired elderly. A proposal for structural change of the organization of care in the county of Stockholm. Läkartidningen 2001, 98:2596-2602.
26. Strange G.R., Chen E.H., Sanders A.B. Use of emergency departments by elderly patients: projections from a multicenter database. Ann Emerg Med 1992, 21:819-824.
27. Ekerstad N., Carlsson P., Edberg A. Prioritization of frail elderly in cardiological care-a medical ethical and economical challenge 2008, Prioriteringscentrum,. http://e.lio.se/prioriteringscentrum/pdf/2008.4.pdf.
28. Patton M.Q. Qualitative research and evaluation methods 2002, Sage, Thousand Oaks. 3rd ed.
29. Graneheim U.H., Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004, 24:105-112.
30. Wilkie P. Ethical issues in qualitative research in palliative care. Palliative Med 1997, 11:321-324.
31. Sharp J.W. Expanding the definition of quality of life for prostate cancer. Cancer 1993, 71:1078-1082.
32. Bastiaens H., Van Royen P., Pavlic D.R., Raposo V., Baker R. Older people's preferences for involvement in their own care: a qualitative study in primary health care in 11 European countries. Patient Educ Couns 2007, 68:33-42.
33. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Sci Med 1999, 49:651-661.
34. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Sci Med 1997, 44:681-692.
35. Balint M. The doctor, his patient and the illness 2000, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.
36. Hanlon J.T., Schmader K.E., Ruby C.M., Weinberger M. Suboptimal prescribing in older inpatients and outpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001, 69:200-209.
37. Lazarou J., Pomeranz B.H., Corey P.N. Indence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Am Med Assoc 1998, 279:1200-1205.
38. Käärik U. High number of emigrating doctors in Sweden. Läkartidningen 2005, 102:1289.
39. Mitchell A.U., Tabaei F.H., Østergaard D., Freil M. Conditions for foreign doctors' clinical work assessed by Danish health care personnel, patients and foreign doctors. Ugeskr Laeger 2008, 170:1833-1838.
40. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int 2000, 15:259-267.
41. Gibson C. A concept analysis of empowerment. J Adv Nurs 1991, 16.
42. Edwards M., Davies M., Edwards A. What are the external influences on information exchange and shared decision-making in healthcare consultations: a meta-synthesis of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 2009, 75:37-52.
43. Foucault M. Power/knowledge: selected interviews & other writings 1972-1977 1980, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
44. Elwin G. Arriving at the postmodern medical consultation. Eur J Gen Pract 2004, 10:93-97.
45. McGregor S. Roles, power and subjective choice. Patient Educ Couns 2006, 60:5-9.
46. Bates B. Care of the self and patient participation in genetic discourse: a Foucauldian reading of the surgeon general's " My family health portrait" program. J Genet Couns 2005, 14:423-434.
47. Bates B.R. Care of the self and American physicians' place in the " War on Terror": a Foucauldian reading of senator Bill Frist, M.D. J Med Philos 2006, 31:385-400.
48. Broom A. Virtually He@lthy: the impact of internet use on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship. Qual Health Res 2005, 15:325-345.
49. Henwood F., Wyatt S., Hart A., Smith J. 'Ignorance is bliss sometimes': constraints on the emergence of the 'informed patient' in the changing landscapes of health information. Sociol Health Ill 2003, 25:589-607.