Eye movements and parafoveal processing during reading in Korean

Reading and Writing

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1053-1078

  Kim, Young Suk ^a   Radach, Ralph ^b   Vorstius, Christian ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WUPPERTAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Korean reading; Parafoveal preview; Semantic processing; Syntactic processing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860371954     PISSN: 09224777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-011-9349-0     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Altarriba, J., Kambe, G., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2001). Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 875-890.
2. Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364-390.
3. Carlson, G. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1988). Thematic roles and language comprehension. In W. Wilkins (Ed.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 21). Thematic relations (pp. 263-300). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1239-1249.
5. Engbert, R., & Nuthmann, A. (2008). Self-consistent estimation of mislocated fixations during reading. PLoS ONE, 3(2), e1534.
6. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777-813.
7. Hagstrom, P., & Rhee, J. (1997). Differences between Korean and Japanese processing overload. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 189-206.
8. Hohenstein, S., Laubrock, J., & Kliegl, R. (2010). Semantic preview benefit during eye movements in reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1150-1170.
9. Inhoff, A. W. (1990). Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: The role of letter and word units. Acta Psychologica, 73, 281-297.
10. Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (1998). Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 29-54). Oxford: Else.
11. Inhoff, A. W., & Weger, U. (2003). Advancing the methodological middle ground. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movements (pp. 335-344). Oxford: Elsevier.
12. Kim, Y. (1999). The effects of case marking information on Korean sentence processing. Language and cognitive processes, 14, 687-714.
13. Kim, Y.-S. (2007). Phonological awareness and literacy skills in Korean: An examination of the unique role of body-coda units. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 67-93.
14. Kim, Y.-S. (2011). Considering linguistic and orthographic features in early literacy acquisition: Evidence from Korean. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 177-189.
15. Koh, S. (1997). The resolution of the dative NP ambiguity in Korean. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 265-273.
16. Lee, I., & Ramsey, R. (2000). The Korean language. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
17. Lee, S. S., Lee, K.-D., Nam, K.-S., Chung, C.-S., Lee, I.-K., & Choi, Y.-C. (1991). Development of a corpus of contemporary Korean for compiling a lexicographical database. Seoul, Korea: Korean Dictionary Compilation Board of Yonsei University.
18. Lee, H.-W., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1999). The time course of phonological, semantic, and orthographic coding in reading: Evidence from the fast-priming technique. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 624-634.
19. Liu, W., Inhoff, A. W., Ye, Y., & Wu, C. (2002). Use of parafoveal visible characters during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1213-1227.
20. MacDonald, M. C., Perlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
21. Mazuka, R., & Lust, B. (1990). On parameter-setting and parsing: Predictions for acquisition. In L. Frazier & J. de Villiers (Eds.), Language processing and acquisition (pp. 163-206). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
22. McConkie, G. W. (1981). Evaluating and reporting data quality in eye movement research. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 13, 97-106.
23. Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 148-162.
24. Radach, R., & Kennedy, A. (2004). Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current deficits and an agenda for future research. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 3-26.
25. Radach, R., Reilly, R., & Inhoff, A. W. (2007). Models of oculomotor control in reading: Towards a theoretical foundation of current debates. In R. van Gompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray, & R. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain. Elsevier: Oxford.
26. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
27. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
28. Rayner, K., Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A., & Bertera, J. H. (1982). The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 537-550.
29. Rayner, K., Balota, D. A., & Pollatsek, A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 473-483.
30. Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 213-234). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
31. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
32. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 446-526.
33. Reilly, R., & Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 34-55.
34. Sohn, H.-M. (1999). The Korean language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Suh, S. (1994). The syntax of Korean and its implications for parsing theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
36. Uehara, K. (1997). Judgments of processing load in Japanese: The effect of NP-ga sequences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 255-263.
37. Yan, M., Richter, E., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 561-566.
38. Yan, M., Risse, S., Zhou, X., & Kliegl, R. (in press). Preview fixation duration modulates identical and semantic preview benefit in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.
39. Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (in press). Lexical and sub-lexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
40. Yang, J., Wang, S., Tong, X., & Rayner, K. (in press). Semantic and plausibility effects on preview benefit during eye fixations in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.
41. Yen, M.-H., Tzeng, O. J.-L., Radach, R., & Tsai, J.-L. (2011). Usage of statistical cues for word boundary in reading Chinese sentences. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary Journal (in press).