Integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for architect selection

Technological and Economic Development of Economy

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 645-666

  Keršuliene, Violeta ^a   Turskis, Zenonas ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

ARAS; ARAS F; architect; decision making; linguistic representation; MCDM; multiple criteria; personnel selection; SWARA

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860367508     PISSN: 20294913     EISSN: 20294921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/20294913.2011.635718     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Azadeh, A.; Saberi, M.; Moghaddam, R. T.; Javanmardi, L 2011. An integrated data envelopment analysis-artificial neural network-rough eet algorithm for assessment of personnel efficiency, Expert Systems with Applications 38 3: 1364-1373. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.033
2. Bakshi, T.; Sarkar, B 2011. MCA based performance evaluation of project selection, International Journal of Software Engineering and Applications (IJSEA) 2 2: 14-22. doi:10.5121/ijsea.2011.2202
3. Bellman, R. E.; Zadeh, L. A 1970. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment, Management Science 17: B-141-B-164. doi:10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
4. Celik, M.; Kandakoglu, A.; Er, I. D. 2009. Structuring fuzzy integrated multi-stages evaluation model on academic personnel recruitment in MET institutions, Expert Systems with Applications 36 3 Part 2: 6918-6927. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.057
5. Chen, L.-S.; Cheng, C.-H 2005. Selecting IS personnel use fuzzy GDSS based on metric distance method, European Journal of Operational Research 160 3: 803-820. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2003.07.003
6. Chen, S. H.; Wang, P. W.; Chen, C. M.; Lee, H. T 2010. An analytic hierarchy process approach with linguistic variables for selection of an R & D strategic alliance partner, Computers and Industrial Engineering 58: 278-287. doi:10.1016/j.cie2009.10.006
7. Chien, C.-F.; Chen, L.-F 2008. Data mining to improve personnel selection and enhance human capital: a case study in high-technology industry, Expert Systems with Applications 34 1: 280-290. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.09.003
8. Deng, H.-P 2009. Developments in fuzzy multicriteria analysis, Fuzzy Information and Engineering 1 1: 103-109. doi:10.1007/s12543-009-0008-y
9. Dursun, M.; Karsak, E. E 2010. A fuzzy MCDM approach for personnel selection, Expert Systems with Applications 37 6: 4324-4330. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.067
10. Greco, S.; Kadziński, M.; Słwiński, R 2011. Selection of a representative value function in robust multiple criteria sorting, Computers and Operations Research 38 11: 1620-1637. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2011.02.003
11. Huang, D. K.; Chiu, H. N.; Yeh, R. H.; Chang, J. H 2009. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for solving a bi-objective personnel assignment problem, Computers and Industrial Engineering 56 1: 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2008.03.007
12. Kelemenis, A.; Askounis, D 2010. A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection, Expert Systems with Applications 37 7: 4999-5008. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.013
13. Kelemenis, A.; Ergazakis, K.; Askounis, D 2011. Support managers' selection using an extension of fuzzy TOPSIS, Expert Systems with Applications 38 3: 2774-2782. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.068
14. Keršuliene, V.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z 2010. Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA), Journal of Business Economics and Management 11 2: 243-258. doi:10.3846/jbem.010.12
15. Liang, G.-S.; Wang, M.-J. J 1994. Personnel selection using fuzzy MCDM algorithm, European Journal of Operational Research 78 1: 22-33. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(94)90119-8
16. Lin, S.-Y.; Horng, S.-J.; Kao, T.-W.; Huang, D.-K.; Fahn, C.-S.; Lai, J.-L.; Chen, R.-J.; Kuo, I.-H 2010. An efficient bi-objective personnel assignment algorithm based on a hybrid particle swarm optimization model, Expert Systems and Applications 37: 7825-7830. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.056
17. Lin, H.-T 2010. Personnel selection using analytic network process and fuzzy data envelopment analysis approaches, Computers and Industrial Engineering 59 4: 937-944. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2010.09.004
18. Ling, Y. Y 2003. A conceptual model for selection of architects by project managers in Singapore, International Journal of Project Management 21 2: 135-144. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00014-5
19. Ölçer, A. İ.; Odabaşi, A. Y 2005. A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to propulsion/manoeuvring system selection problem, European Journal of Operational Research 166 1: 93-114. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.02.010
20. Saaty, T. L 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15: 234-281. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
21. Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytical Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Shahhosseini, V.; Sebt, M. H 2011. Competency-based selection and assignment of human resources to construction projects, Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 18 2: 163-180. doi:10.10.1016/j.scient.2011.03.026
23. Tupenaite, L.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Turskis, Z.; Seniut, M 2010. Multiple criteria assessment of alternatives for built and human environment renovation, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 16 2: 257-266. doi:10.3846/jcem.2010.30
24. Turskis, Z. and Zavadskas, E. K. 2010b. A novel method for multiple criteria analysis: grey additive ratio assessment (ARAS-G) method. Informatica, 21(4): 597-610.
25. Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E. K 2010a. A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS-F). Case study: the analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location, Transport 25 4: 423-432. doi:10.3846/transport.2010.52
26. Van Iddekinge, C. H.; Putka, D. J.; Campbell, J. P 2011. Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: the validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions, Journal of Applied Psychology 96 1: 13-33. doi:10.1037/a0021193
27. Van Laarhoven, P. J. M.; Pedrycz, W 1983. A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11: 229-241. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7
28. Zadeh, A. L. 1979. "A theory of approximate reasoning". In Machine Intelligence 9, Edited by: Hayes, J., Michie, D. and Mikulich, L. I. 149-194. New York: Halstead Press.
29. Zadeh, A. L 2008. Is there need for fuzzy logic?, Information Sciences 178 30: 2751-2779. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2008.02.012
30. Zadeh, L. A 1975a. Fuzzy logic and its application to approximate reasoning, Part I, Information Science 8 3: 199-249. doi:10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5
31. Zadeh, L. A 1975b. Fuzzy logic and its application to approximate reasoning, Part II, Information Science 8 4: 301-357. doi:10.1016/0020-0255(75)90046-8
32. Zadeh, L. A 1975c. Fuzzy logic and its application to approximate reasoning, Part III, Information Science 9 1: 43-80. doi:10.1016/0020-0255(75)90017-1
33. Zadeh, L. A 1975d. Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning, Synthese 30: 407-428. doi:10.1007/BF00485052
34. Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z 2010. A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16 2: 159-172. doi:10.3846/tede.2010.10
35. Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z 2011. Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17 2: 397-427. doi:10.3846/20294913.2011.593291
36. Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Ustinovichius, L. and Shevchenko, G. 2010a. Attributes weights determining peculiarities in multiple attribute decision making methods. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 21(1): 32-43.
37. Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. and Vilutiene, T. 2010b. Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 10(3): 123-141.
38. Zavadskas, E. K.; Vilutienė, T 2006. A multiple-criteria evaluation of multi-family apartment block maintenance contractors: I-Model for maintenance contractor evaluation and the determination of its selection criteria, Building and Environment 41 5: 621-632. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.02.019
39. Zhang, S.-F.; Liu, S.-Y 2011. A GRA-based intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making method for personnel selection, Expert Systems with Applications 38 9: 11401-11405. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.012
40. Zimmermann, H.-J 2000. An application-oriented view of modelling uncertainty, European Journal of Operational Research 122 2: 190-198. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00228-3
41. Zimmermann, H. J. 1985. Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.