A study on seismicity and seismic hazard for Karnataka State

Journal of Earth System Science

Volumn 121, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 475-490

  Sitharam, T G ^a   James, Naveen ^a   Vipin, K S ^a   Ganesha Raj, K ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

^b INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANISATION   (India)

Author keywords

Dsha; Earthquakes; Faults logic tree; Hazard; Karnataka; Lineaments; Pga; Psha

Indexed keywords

AFTERSHOCK; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; EURASIAN PLATE; FORESHOCK; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; INDIAN PLATE; INTRAPLATE PROCESS; LINEAMENT; SATELLITE DATA; SEISMIC ATTENUATION; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMICITY; SPATIAL VARIATION;

INDIA; KARNATAKA;

EID: 84860367210     PISSN: 02534126     EISSN: 0973774X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12040-012-0171-0     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anbazhagan P, Vinod J S and Sitharam T G 2009 Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Bangalore; Natural Hazards 48 145-166.
2. Atkinson G M and Boore D M 2006 Earthquake groundmotion prediction equations for eastern north America; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96(6) 2181-2205.
3. Basu S and Nigam N C 1977 Seismic risk analysis of Indian peninsula; Proc. 6th World Conf. Earthqu. Engg., New Delhi 1 782-788.
4. Bhatia S C, Ravi Kumar M and Gupta H K 1999 A probabilistic seismic hazard map of India and adjoining regions; Annali De Geofisica 46(2) 1154-1164.
5. BIS-1893 2002 Indian Standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Part 1: General provisions and buildings; Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
6. Bommer J J, Scherbaum F, Bungum H, Cotton F, Sabetta F and Abrahamson N A 2005 On the use of logic trees for ground-motion prediction equations in seismic hazard analysis; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95 377-389.
7. Chandra U 1977 Earthquakes of peninsular India-A seismotectonic study; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 67(5) 1387-1413.
8. Cornell C A 1968 Engineering seismic risk analysis; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 58 1583-1606.
9. Costa G, Panza G F, Suhadolc P and Vaccari F 1993 Zoning of the Italian territory in terms of expected peak ground acceleration derived from complete synthetic seismograms; In: Geophysical Exploration in Areas of Complex Geology, II (eds) Cassinis R, Helbig K and Panza G F, J. Appl. Geophys. 30 149-160.
10. Frankel A 1995 Mapping seismic hazard in the Central Eastern United States; Seismol. Res. Lett. 66(4) 8-21.
11. Gangrade B K and Arora S K 2000 Seismicity of the Indian peninsular shield from regional earthquake data; Pure Appl. Geophys. 157 1683-1705.
12. Gubin I E 1968 Seismic zoning of Indian peninsula; Bull. Int. Inst. Seismol. Earthquake Eng. 5 109-139.
13. Guha S K 1962 Seismic regionalization of India; 2nd Symposium Earthquake Engineering, Roorkee, pp. 191-207.
14. Gutenberg B and Richter C F 1944 Frequency of earthquakes in California; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 34 185-188.
15. Heaton T H, Tajima T F and Mori A W 1986 Estimating ground motions using recorded accelerograms; Surv. Geophys. 8 25-83.
16. Iyengar R N, Sharama D and Siddiqui J M 1999 Earthquake history of India in Medieval times; Indian J. History Sci. 34(3) 181-237.
17. Jain S K, Murty C V R, Chandak N, Seeber L and Jain N K 1994 The September 29, 1993, M6.4 Killari, Maharashtra Earthquake in Central India; EERI Special Earthquake Report, EERI Newsletter 28(1).
18. Jaiswal K and Sinha R 2007 Probabilistic seismic-hazard estimation for peninsular India; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97(1B) 318-330.
19. Kaila K L and Rao N M 1979 Seismic zoning maps of the Indian subcontinent; Geophys. Res. Bull. 17 293-301.
20. Kaila K L, Gaur V K and Hari N 1972 Quantitative seismicity maps of India; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 62 1119-1131.
21. Khatri K N, Rogers AM, and Algermissen S T 1984 A seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas; Tectonophys. 108 93-134.
22. Kramer S L 1996 Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering; Pearson Education Pvt. Ltd, Delhi, India, Reprinted in 2003.
23. Krishna J 1959 Seismic zoning of India; Earthquake Engineering, Seminar, Roorkee University, India, pp. 32-38.
24. Kumar P, Yuan X, Kumar M R, Kind R, Li X and Chadha R K 2007 The rapid drift of the Indian tectonic plate; Nature 449 894-897.
25. Menon A, Ornthammarath T, Corigliano M and Lai C G 2010 Probabilistic seismic hazard macrozonation of Tamil Nadu in southern India; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100(3) 1320-1341.
26. Parvez I A, Vaccari F and Panza G F 2003 A deterministic seismic hazard map of India and adjacent area; Geophys. J. Int. 155 489-508.
27. Panza G F, Vaccari F and Cazzaro R 1999 Deterministic seismic hazard assessment; In: Vrancea, Earthquakes: Tectonic and risk mitigation (eds) Wenzel F et al (The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 269-286.
28. Raghu Kanth S T G and Iyengar R N 2007 Estimation of seismic spectral acceleration in Peninsular India; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 116(3) 199-214.
29. Ram A and Rathor H S 1970 On frequency magnitude and energy of significant Indian earthquakes; Pure Appl. Geophys. 79 26-32.
30. Ramalingeswara Rao B and Sitapathi Rao P 1984 Historical seismicity of peninsular India; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74 2519-2533.
31. Ramasamy S M 2006 Remote sensing and active tectonics of South India; Int. J. Remote Sens. 27(20) 4397-4431.
32. Reiter L 1990 Earthquake hazard analysis: Issues and insights; Columbia University Press, New York, USA.
33. Scordilis E M 2006 Empirical global relations converting Ms and mb to moment magnitude; J. Seismol. 10 225-236.
34. SEISAT 2000 Seismotectonic Atlas of India; Geological Survey of India, New Delhi.
35. Stepp J C 1972 Analysis of the completeness of the earthquake sample in the Puget Sound area and its effects on statistical estimates of earthquakes hazard; In: Proc. Int. Conf. Microzonation for Safer Construct, Res. Appl., Seattle, Washington 64(4) 1189-1207.
36. Sitharam T G and Anbazhagan P 2006 Seismic hazard analysis for the Bangalore region, Natural Hazards 40 261-278.
37. Sitharam T G, Anbazhagan P and Ganesha Raj K 2006 Use of remote sensing and seismotectonic parameters for seismic hazard analysis of Bangalore; Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 6 927-939.
38. Sitharam T G and Vipin K S 2011 Evaluation of spatial variation of peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration for south India: Probabilistic approach; Natural Hazards 59(2) 639-653, doi: 10.1007/s11069-011-9784-x.
39. Tandon A N 1956 Zoning of India liable to earthquake damage; Indian J. Meteorol. Geophys. 10 137-146.
40. Toro G N, Abrahamson N and Schneider J 1997 Model of strong ground motions from earthquakes in central and eastern North America: Best estimates and uncertainties; Seismol. Res. Lett. 68 41-57.
41. Vipin K S, Anbazhagan P and Sitharam T G 2009 Estimation of peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration for South India with local site effects: Probabilistic approach; Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 9 865-878.
42. Vipin K S and Sitharam T G 2011 Multiple source and attenuation relationships for evaluation of deterministic seismic hazard: Logic tree approach considering the geology and local site effects; Georisk 5(3-4) 173-185, doi: 10.1080/17499518.2010.532015.
43. Walling M Y and Mohanty W K 2009 An overview on the seismic zonation and microzonation studies in India; Earth Sci. Rev. 96 67-91.
44. Wang Z 2005 Discussion-Klügel, J-U 2005 problems in the application of the SSHAC probability method for assessing earthquake hazards at Swiss nuclear power plants; Eng. Geology 78 285-307.