Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Bangalore

Natural Hazards

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 145-166

  Anbazhagan, P ^a   Vinod, J S ^a   Sitharam, T G ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

'b' value; Probability; Seismic hazard analysis; Seismicity; Spectral acceleration and return period

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE CATALOGUE; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; PARAMETERIZATION; PROBABILITY; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC SOURCE; SEISMICITY; TECTONIC SETTING;

ASIA; BANGALORE; EURASIA; INDIA; KARNATAKA; SOUTH ASIA;

EID: 58149478128     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-008-9253-3     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Algermissen ST, Perkins DM (1976) A probabilistic estimate of maximum acceleration in rock in the contiguous United States. USGS Open File Report 76-416, p 45
2. Bhatia SC, Ravi Kumar M, Gupta HK (1999) A probabilistic seismic hazard map of India and adjoining regions. http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/gshap/ict/ india.html, pp 1-12
3. Bilham R (2004) Earthquakes in India and the Himalaya: Tectonics, geodesy and history. Ann Geophys 47(2):839-858
4. BIS (2002) IS 1893-2002, Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part 1 - general provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
5. Bommer JJ, Abrahamson NA (2006) Why do modern probabilistic seismic-hazard analyses often lead to increased hazard estimates? Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(6):1967-1977
6. Bommer JJ, Scott SG, Sarma SK (2000) Hazard-consistent earthquake scenarios. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 19:219-231
7. Chandra U (1977) Earthquakes of Peninsular India: A seismotectonic study. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65:1387-1413
8. Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:1583-1606
9. Cornell CA, Van Marke EH (1969) The major influences on seismic risk. Proceedings of the Third World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, A(1), pp 69-93
10. Das S, Guptha ID, Guptha VK (2006) A Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Northeast India. Earthq Spectra 22(1):1-27
11. Ganesha Raj K, Nijagunappa R (2004) Major lineaments of Karnataka state and their relation to seismicity: Remote sensing based analysis. J Geol Soc India 63:430-439
12. Ganesha Raj K (2001) Major lineaments of Karnataka and their significance with respect to seismicity - remote sensing based analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Gulbarga University, Karnataka, India
13. Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 34:185-188
14. Heaton TH, Tajima F, Mori AW (1986) Estimating ground motions using recorded accelerograms. Surveys Geophys 8:25-83
15. Iyengar RN, Ghosh S (2004) Microzonation of earthquake hazard in greater Delhi area. Curr Sci 87:1193-1202
16. Iyengar RN, RaghuKanth STG (2004) Attenuation of strong ground motion in Peninsular India. Seismol Res Lett 75(4):530-540
17. Jaiswal K, Sinha R (2006) Probabilistic modeling of earthquake hazard in stable continental shield of the Indian Peninsula. ISET J Earthq Technol 43(3):49-64
18. Joyner WB, Boore DM (1981) Peak horizontal accelerations and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:2011-2038
19. Kaila KL, Gaur VK, Narain Hari (1972) Quantitative seismicity maps of India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 62:1119-1131
20. Khattri KN (1992) Seismic hazard in Indian region. Curr Sci 62(1-2):109-116
21. Kijko A, Sellevoll MA (1989) Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part I: Utilization of extreme and complete catalogs with different threshold magnitudes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79:645-654
22. Kijko A, Sellevoll MA (1992) Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part II. Incorporating magnitude heterogeneity. Bull Seismol Soc Am 82:120-134
23. Kiureghian DA, Ang AH-S (1977) A fault-rupture model for seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 67(4):1173-1194
24. Klügel J-U (2005) Problems in the application of the SSHAC probability method for assessing earthquake hazards at Swiss nuclear power plants. Eng Geol 78:285-307
25. Klügel J-U (2007a) Error inflation in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Eng Geol 90:186-192
26. Klügel J-U (2007b) Comment on "Why do modern probabilistic seismic hazard analyses often lead to increased hazard estimates?" by Julian J. Bommer and Norman A. Abrahamson. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:2198-2207
27. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Pearson Education Pte Ltd
28. Kumar P, Yuan X, Kumar MR, Kind R, Li X, Chada RK (2007) The rapid drift of the Indian tectonic plate. Nature 449:894-897
29. McGuire RK (1976) FORTRAN computer program for seismic risk analysis. US Geol Surv, Open File Rep No. 76-67
30. McGuire RK (1978) FRISK - a computer program for seismic risk analysis. US Department of Interior, Geological Survey, Open-File Report 78-1007.
31. Nath SK (2006) Seismic hazard and microzonation atlas of the Sikkim Himalaya. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, India
32. Orozova IM, Suhadolc P (1999) A deterministic-probabilistic approach for seismic hazard assessment. Tectonophysics 312:191-202
33. Parvez AI, Vaccari F, Panza GF (2003) A deterministic seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas. Geophys J Int 155:489-508
34. Peruzza L, Slejko D, Bragato PL (2000) The Umbria-Marche case: Some suggestions for the Italian seismic zonation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20:361-371
35. Purnachandra Rao N (1999) Single station moment tensor inversion for focal mechanisms of Indian intra-plate earthquakes. Curr Sci 77:1184-1189
36. RaghuKanth STG (2005) Engineering models for earthquake sources. Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
37. RaghuKanth STG, Iyengar RN (2006) Seismic hazard estimation for Mumbai city. Curr Sci 91(11):1486-1494
38. Rajendran K, Rajendran CP (1999) Seismogenesis in the stable continental interiors: An appraisal based on two examples from India. Tectonophysics 305:355-370
39. Ram A, Rathor HS (1970) On frequency magnitude and energy of significant Indian earthquakes. Pure Appl Geophys 79:26-32
40. Ramalingeswara Rao B (2000) Historical seismicity and deformation rates in the Indian Peninsular shield. J Seismol 4:247-258
41. Ramalingeswara Rao B, Sitapathi Rao P (1984) Historical seismicity of Peninsular India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74:2519-2533
42. Ravi Kumar M, Bhatia SC (1999) A new seismic hazard map for the Indian plate region under the global seismic hazard assessment programme. Curr Sci 77(3):447-453
43. Reddy PR (2003) Need for high-resolution deep seismic reflection studies in strategic locales of South India. Curr Sci 84(8):25-26
44. Regulatory Guide 1.165 (1997) Identification and characterization of seismic sources and determination of safe shutdown earthquake ground motion. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
45. SEISAT: 2000, Seismotectonic atlas of India. Geological Survey of India
46. Sitharam TG, Anbazhagan P (2007) Seismic hazard analysis for Bangalore region. J Nat Haz 40:261-278
47. Sitharam TG, Anbazhagan P, Ganesha Raj K (2006) Use of remote sensing and seismotectonic parameters for seismic hazard analysis of Bangalore. Nat Haz Earth Syst Sci 6:927-939
48. Sridevi J (2004) Estimation of plate velocity and crustal deformation in the Indian subcontinent using GPS geodesy. Curr Sci 86:1443-1448
49. Srinivasan R, Sreenivas BL (1977) Some new geological features from the Landsat imagery of Karnataka. J Geol Soc India 18:589-597
50. Subrahmanya KR (1996) Active intraplate deformation in south India. Tectonophysics 262:231-241
51. Subrahmanya KR (2002) Deformation related lineaments in the Indian Peninsula near 13°N. J Geophys XXIII-2:59-68
52. Tandon AN (1992) Seimology in India - an overview up to 1970. Curr Sci 62(1-2):9-16
53. Todorovska MI, Gupta ID, Gupta VK, Lee VW, Trifunac MD (1995) Selected topics in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Report No. CE95-08, Dept. of Civil Eng., Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
54. Trifunac MD (1990) A microzonation method based on uniform risk spectra. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 9(1):34-43
55. Valdiya KS (1998) Late quaternary movements and landscape rejuvenation in south-eastern Karnataka and adjoining Tamil Nadu in southern India shield. J Geol Soc India 51:139-166
56. Wang Z (2005) Discussion - Klügel, J.-U. 2005 problems in the application of the SSHAC probability method for assessing earthquake hazards at Swiss nuclear power plants. Eng Geol 78:285-307
57. Wang Z, Zhou M (2007) Comment on "why do modern probabilistic seismic-hazard analyses often lead to increased hazard estimates?" by Julian J. Bommer and Norman A. Abrahamson. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:2212-2214
58. Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):975-1002