Estimation of seismic spectral acceleration in Peninsular India

Journal of Earth System Science

Volumn 116, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 199-214

  Raghu Kanth, S T G ^a   Iyengar, R N ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GUWAHATI   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Attenuation; Peninsular India; Response spectra; Site coefficients

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; ESTIMATION METHOD; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC ATTENUATION; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS; STRONG MOTION;

ASIA; EURASIA; INDIA; SOUTH ASIA;

EID: 36348932242     PISSN: 02534126     EISSN: 02534126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12040-007-0020-8     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Atkinson G M and Boore D M 1995 New ground motion relations for eastern north America; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85 17-30.
2. Atkinson G M and Boore D M 2006 Earthquake Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96(6) 2181-2205.
3. Baumbach et al 1994 Study of foreshocks and aftershocks of the Intraplate Latur earthquake of September 30, 1993, India, Latur earthquake; Geol. Soc. India.
4. Boore D M 1983 Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 73 1865-1894.
5. Boore D M and Atkinson G M 1987 Stochastic prediction of ground motion in Eastern North America; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 4 460-477.
6. Boore D M and Boatwright J 1984 Average body-wave radiation coefficients; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74 1615-1621.
7. Boore D M and Joyner W B 1997 Site Amplification for Generic Rock Sites; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 87(2) 327-341.
8. Boore D M 2003 Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method; Pure Appl. Geophys. 160 635-675.
9. Brune J 1970 Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes; J. Geophys. Res. 75 4997-5009.
10. BSSC 2001 NEHRP Recommendations, Part 1: Provisions; prepared by the Building Seismic Safety Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (Report No FEMA 368), Washington, D.C., USA.
11. Campbell K W 2003 Engineering Models of Strong Ground Motion; In: Earthquake Engineering Handbook (eds) Chen W F, Scawthorn C S (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), 759-803.
12. Cramer C H and Kumar A 2003 2001 Bhuj, India Earthquake Engineering Seismoscope Recordings and Eastern North America Ground-Motion Attenuation Relations; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93 1390-1394.
13. Hwang H and Huo J-R 1997 Attenuation relations of ground motion for rock and soil sites in eastern United States; Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 16 363-372.
14. Hwang H, Lin H and Huo J-R 1997 Site coefficients for design of buildings in Eastern United States; Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 16 29-40.
15. Idriss I M and Sun J I 1992 User's Manual for SHAKE91, A computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analyses of horizontally layered soil deposits.
16. Indian Standard, IS 1893 (Part I) 2002 Indian Standard, Criteria for earthquake resistance design of structures, Fifth revision, Part-I; Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
17. Iyengar R N and Raghu Kanth S T G 2004 Attenuation of strong ground motion in Peninsular India; Seismol. Res. Lett. 79(5) 530-540.
18. Joyner W B and Boore D M 1981 Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979, Imperial valley, California Earthquake; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 71 2011-2038.
19. Krishna J, Chandrasekharan A R and Saini S S 1969 Analysis of Koyna accelerogram of December 11, 1967; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 59 1719-1731.
20. c for Koyna-Warna Region, India; Pure Appl. Geophys. 153 163-177.
21. Saragoni G R and Hart G C 1974 Simulation of artificial earthquakes; Earthquake Eng. Structuml Dyn. 2 249-267.
22. w = 5.8) and Estimation of Ground Motion from Future Earthquakes in the Indian Shield Region; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 89 1620-1630.
23. Toro G, Abrahamson N and Schneider J 1997 Model of strong ground motion in eastern and central North America: best estimates and uncertainties; Seismol.. Res. Lett, 68 41-57.