Estimation of peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration for South India with local site effects: Probabilistic approach

Natural Hazards and Earth System Science

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 865-878

  Vipin, K S ^a   Anbazhagan, P ^a   Sitharam, T G ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTOUR MAP; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; PEAK ACCELERATION; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC MOMENT; SEISMOTECTONICS; SITE EFFECT; SPATIAL VARIATION;

INDIA;

EID: 77949508831     PISSN: 15618633     EISSN: 16849981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-9-865-2009     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anbazhagan, P., Vinod, J. S., and Sitharam, T. G.: Probabilistic seismic hazard Analysis for Bangalore, Nat. hazards, 8, 145-166 2009.
2. Basu, S. and Nigam, N. C.: Seismic risk analysis of Indian peninsula, in: Proc. 6th World Conf. Earthqu. Engg., New Delhi, 1, 782-788, 1977.
3. Bhatia, S. C., Ravi Kumar, M., and Gupta, H. K.: A Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Map of India and Adjoining Regions, 1-12, available at: http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/gshap/ict/india.html,1997.
4. BIS-1893: Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1 - General Provisions and Buildings, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2002.
5. BSSC: NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures 2000 edition, part 1: Provisions, Report no. FEMA 368, Building seismic safety council for the federal emergency management agency,Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
6. Cornell, C. A.: Engineering seismic risk analysis, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 58, 1583-1606, 1968.
7. Eurocode 8.: BS-EN 1998-1, Design of structures for earthquake resistance - part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, European committee for standardization, Brussels, 2005.
8. Ganesha Raj, K. and Nijagunappa, R.: Major Lineaments of Karnataka State and their Relation to Seismicity Remote Sensing Based Analysis, J. Geol. Soc. India, 63, 430-439, 2004.
9. Gangrade, B. K. and Arora, S. K.: Seismicity of the Indian Peninsular Shield from Regional Earthquake Data, Pure Appl. Geophys., 157, 1683-1705, 2000.
10. Gosavi, P. D., Bapat, A. V., and Guha, S. K.: Maeroseismic studies of four reeenl Indian earthquakes, in: Proc. World Conf. Earthquake Engg., 6th, New Delhi, 1, 49-54, 1977.
11. Gubin, I. E.: Seismic zoning of Indian peninsula, Bull. Intern. Inst. Seism. Earthquake Eng., 5, 109-139, 1968.
12. Guha, S. K.: Seismic regionalization of India, 2nd Sym. Earthquake Engg., Roorkee, 191-207, 1962.
13. Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F.: Frequency of earthquakes in California, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 34 185-188, 1944.
14. Heaton, T. H., Tajima, F., and Mori, A. W.: Estimating Ground motions using recorded Accelerograms, Surv. Geophys., 8(1), 25-83, 1986.
15. Iyengar, R. N. and Ghosh, S.: Microzonation of earthquake hazard in greater Delhi area, Curr. Sci. India, 87, 1193-1202, 2004.
16. Iyengar, R. N. and Raghukanth, S. T. G.: Attenuation of Strong Ground Motion in Peninsular India, Seismol. Res. Lett., 75(4), 530-540, 2004.
17. Jade, S.: Estimates of plate velocity and crustal deformation in the Indian subcontinent using GPS geodesy, Curr. Sci. India, 86, 1443-1448, 2004.
18. Jaiswal, K. and Sinha, R.: Probabilistic Modeling of Earthquake Hazard in Stable Continental Shield of the Indian Peninsula, ISET Journal of earthquake technology, 43(3), 49-64, 2006.
19. Jaiswal, K. and Sinha, R.: Probabilistic seismic-hazard estimation for peninsular India, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97(1B), 318-330, 2007.
20. Kaila, K. L., Gaur, V. K., and Narain, H.: Quantitative seismicity maps of India, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 62, 1119-1131, 1972.
21. Kaila, K. L. and Rao, N. M.: Seismic zoning maps of the Indian subcontinent, Geophys. Res. Bull., 17, 293-301, 1979.
22. Kelkar, Y. N.: Earthquakes experienced in Maharashtra during the last 300 years, Daily Kesari Poona, Marathi, January 7, 1968.
23. Khatri, K. N., Rogers, A. M., and Algermissen, S. T.: A seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas, Tectonophysics, 108, 93-134, 1984.
24. Kiureghian, D. A. and Ang, A. H. S.: A fault-rupture model for seismic risk analysis, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 67(4), 1173-1194, 1977.
25. Kramer, S. L.: Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Pearson Education Pvt. Ltd, Reprinted 2003, Delhi, India, 1996.
26. Krishna, J.: Seismic zoning of India, in: Earthquake Engg., Seminar, Roorkee University, India, 32-38, 1959.
27. Kumar, P., Yuan, X., Ravi Kumar, M., Kind, R., Li, X., and Chadha, R. K.: The rapid drift of Indian tectonic plate, Nature, 449, 894-897, 2007.
28. Mandal, P., Rastogi, B. K., and Gupta, H. K.: Recent Indian earthquakes, Curr. Sci. India, 79(9), 1334-1346, 2000.
29. McGuire, R. K. and Arabasz, W. J.: An introduction to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, in: Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics, edited by: Ward, S. H., Society of Exploration Geophysicist, 1, 333-353, 1990.
30. Milne, J.: A Catalogue of Destructive Earthquakes, A.D. 7 to A.D. 1899, British Association for the Advancement of Science, London, 92 pp., 1911.
31. Oldham, T. A.: Catalogue of Indian earthquakes, Mem. Geol. Surv. India, 19, 163-215, 1883.
32. Purnachandra Rao, N.: Single station moment tensor inversion for focal mechanisms of Indian intra-plate earthquakes, Curr. Sci. India, 77, 1184-1189, 1999.
33. Raghu Kanth, S. T. G. and Iyengar, R. N.: Seismic hazard estimation for Mumbai city, Curr. Sci. India, 91(11), 1486-1494, 2006.
34. Raghu Kanth, S. T. G. and Iyengar, R. N.: Estimation of Seismic Spectral Acceleration in Peninsular India, J. Earth Sys. Sci., 116(3), 199-214, 2007.
35. Ram, A. and Rathor, H. S.: On frequency magnitude and energy of significant Indian earthquakes, Pure Appl. Geophys., 79, 26-32, 1970.
36. Ramalingeswara Rao, B.: Historical Seismicity and deformation rates in the Indian Peninsular Shield, J. Seismol., 4, 247-258, 2000.
37. Ramalingeswara Rao, B. and Sitapathi Rao, P.: Historical Seismicity of Peninsular India, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 74, 2519-2533, 1984.
38. Reddy, P. R: Need for high-resolution deep seismic reflection studies in strategic locales of South India, Curr. Sci. India, 84(8), 973-974, 2003.
39. Regulatory Guide 1.165: Identification and characterization of seismic sources and determination of safe shutdown earthquake ground motion, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1997.
40. Scordilis, E. M.: Empirical global relations converting ms and mb to moment magnitude, J. Seismol., 10, 225-236, 2006.
41. Seeber, L., Armbruster, J. G., and Jacob, K. H.: Probabilistic Assessment of Seismic Hazard for Maharashtra, Govt. of Maharashtra, Unpublished Report, 1999.
42. SEISAT: Seismotectonic Atlas of India, Geological Survey of India, 2000.
43. Sitharam, T. G. and Anbazhagan, P.: Seismic Hazard Analysis for the Bangalore Region, Nat. Hazards, 40, 261-278, 2007.
44. Sitharam, T. G., Anbazhagan, P., and Ganesha Raj, K.: Use of remote sensing and seismotectonic parameters for seismic hazard analysis of Bangalore, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 927-939,2006, http://www.nat-hazards-earth- syst-sci.net/6/927/2006/.
45. Srivastava, H. N. and Ramachandran, K.: New catalogue of earthquakes for Peninsular India during 1839-1900, Mausam, 36(3), 351-358, 1983.
46. Stepp, J. C.: Analysis of the completeness of the earthquake sample in the Puget Sound area and its effects on statistical estimates of earthquakes hazard, in: Proc. Inter. Conf. Microzonation for safer construct, Res. Appl. Seattle, Washington, 64(4), 1189-1207, 1972.
47. Tandon, A. N.: Zoning of India liable to earthquake damage, Indian Journal of Meteorology and Geophysics, 10, 137-146, 1956.
48. Turner, H. H.: Seismological investigations XII, seismic activity, 1899-1903 inclusive, British Association for the Advancement of Science, London, 57-65, 1911.
49. Valdiya, K. S.: Tectonic framework of India: A review and interpretation of recent structural and tectonic studies, Geophys. Res. Bull. 11, 79-114, 1973.
50. Wells, D. L. and Coppersmith, K. J.: New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84, 974-1002, 1994.