Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary analysis measuring intracoronary lengths in patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography

Postepy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 31-41

  Legutko, Jacek ^a   Rzeszutko, Lukasz ^a   Partyka, Lukasz ^a,b   Depukat, Rafał ^a   Wojdyla, Marcin ^a   Barycz, Grzegorz ^a,b   Wizimirski, Marcin ^a,b   Stefaniak, Justyna ^b   Tijdens, Folkert ^c   Bary, Lizet ^c   Dubiel, Jacek S ^a   Dudek, Dariusz ^a   Kaluza, Grzegorz L ^d  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Poland)

^b Krakow Cardiovascular Research Institute   (Poland)

^c Pie Medical Imaging   (Netherlands)

^d CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

2D; 3D; Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; GUIDE WIRE; HUMAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL QUANTITATIVE CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS; TWO DIMENSIONAL QUANTITATIVE CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS;

EID: 84860364758     PISSN: 17349338     EISSN: 18974295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5114/pwki.2012.27923     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Foley DP, Escaned J, Strauss BH, et al. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in international cardiology: clinical application of QCA measurements. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1994; 36: 363-384. (Pubitemid 24105271)
2. Green NE, Chen SY, Messenger JC, et al. Three-dimensional vascular angiography. Curr Probl Cardiol 2004; 29: 104-142.
3. Herrington DM, Siebes M, Sokol DK, et al. Variability in measures of coronary lumen dimensions using quantitative coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1068-1074. (Pubitemid 23285756)
4. Wellnhofer E, Wahle A, Mugaragu I, et al. Validation of an accurate method for three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative assessment of volumes, lengths and diameters of coronary vascular branches and segments from biplane angiographic projections. Int J Card Imaging 1999; 15: 339-353.
5. Messenger JC, Chen SY, Carroll JD, et al. 3D coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: clinical validation and quantitative analysis of the right coronary artery in 100 patients. Int J Card Imaging 2000; 16: 413-427. (Pubitemid 32674316)
6. Dvir D, Marom H, Guetta V, Kornowski R. Three-dimensional coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: in vivo quantitative validation. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 2005; 7: 141-145. (Pubitemid 41503232)
7. Gradaus R, Mathies K, Breithardt G, Böcker D. Clinical assessment of a new real time 3D quantitative coronary angiography system: evaluation in stented vessel segments. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 68: 44-49. (Pubitemid 44024460)
8. Ramcharitar S, Daeman J, Patterson M, et al. First direct in vivo comparison of two commercially available three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography systems. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 71: 44-50. (Pubitemid 351158345)
9. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai G, Van Langenhove G, et al. Comparison of assessment of native coronary arteries by standard versus three-dimensional coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2008; 102: 272-279.
10. Schuurbiers JC, Lopez NG, Ligthart J, et al. In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 73: 620-626.
11. Green NE, Chen SY, Hansgen AR, et al. Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 64: 451-459. (Pubitemid 40463442)
12. Sakurai R, Ako J, Morino Y, et al.; SIRIUS Trial Investigators. Predictors of edge stenosis following sirolimus-eluting stent deployment (a quantitative intravascular ultrasound analysis from the SIRIUS trial). Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 1251-1253. (Pubitemid 41505403)
13. Fujii K, Carlier SG, Mintz GS, et al. Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 995-998. (Pubitemid 40432428)
14. Park DW, Park SW, Park KH, et al. Frequency of and risk factors for stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation during long-term follow-up. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 352-356.
15. Okabe T, Mintz GS, Buch AN, et al. Intravascular ultrasound parameters associated with stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent deployment. Am J Cardiol 2007; 100: 615-620. (Pubitemid 47223136)
16. Baran KW, Lasala JM, Cox DA, et al.; ARRIVE Investigators. A clinical risk score for prediction of stent thrombosis. Am J Cardiol 2008; 102: 541-545.
17. Liu X, Doi H, Maehara A, et al. A volumetric intravascular ultrasound comparison of early drug-eluting stent thrombosis versus restenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 428-434.
18. Gronenschild E, Janssen J, Tijdens F. CAAS. II: A second generation system for off-line and on-line quantitative coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994; 33: 61-75. (Pubitemid 24303004)
19. Tommasini G, Rubartelli P, Piaggio M. A deterministic approach to automated stenosis quantification. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999; 48: 435-445.
20. Girasis C, Serruys PW, Onuma Y, et al. 3-Dimensional bifurcation angle analysis in patients with left main disease: a substudy of the SYNTAX trial (SYNergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXus and Cardiac Surgery). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 41-48.
21. Neubauer AM, Garcia JA, Messenger JC, et al. Clinical feasibility of a fully automated 3D reconstruction of rotational coronary X-ray angiograms. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 71-79.
22. Yong AS, Ng AC, Brieger D, et al. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 345-353.