Femoral offset is underestimated on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis but accurately assessed on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 94 B, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 477-482

  Merle, C ^a   Waldstein, W ^a   Pegg, E ^a   Streit, M R ^a,b   Gotterbarm, T ^a,b   Aldinger, P R ^a,c   Murray, D W ^a   Gill, H S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c Paulinenhilfe   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT POSITIONING; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PELVIC BONES; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84860347305     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B4.28067     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, An KN, Cabanela ME. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1995;77-B:865-869.
2. Asayama I, Chamnongkich S, Simpson KJ, Kinsey TL, Mahoney OM. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:414-420. (Pubitemid 40804445)
3. Charles MN, Bourne RB, Davey JR, et al. Soft-tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration. Instr Course Lect 2005;54:131-141.
4. Matsushita A, Nakashima Y, Jingushi S, et al. Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:646-651.
5. Sakai T, Sugano N, Ohzono K, et al. Femoral anteversion, femoral offset, and abductor lever arm after total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral neck system. J Orthop Sci 2002;7:62-67. (Pubitemid 34206067)
6. Lecerf G, Fessy MH, Philippot R, et al. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009;95:210-219.
7. Patel AB, Wagle RR, Usrey MM, et al. Guidelines for implant placement to minimize impingement during activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:1275-1281.
8. Sakalkale DP, Sharkey PF, Eng K, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001;388:125-134. (Pubitemid 32595015)
9. Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Aubaniac JM, et al. The morphology of the proximal femur: a three-dimensional radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74-B:28-32.
10. Sariali E, Mouttet A, Pasquier G, Durante E. Three-dimensional hip anatomy in osteoarthritis: analysis of the femoral offset. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:990-997.
11. Sariali E, Mouttet A, Pasquier G, Durante E, Catone Y. Accuracy of reconstruction of the hip using computerised three-dimensional pre-operative planning and a cementless modular neck. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:333-340.
12. Sugano N, Ohzono K, Nishii T, et al. Computed-tomography-based computer preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 1998;3:320-324. (Pubitemid 29268753)
13. Lee YS, Oh SH, Seon JK, Song EK, Yoon TR. 3D femoral neck anteversion measurements based on the posterior femoral plane in ORTHODOC system. Med Biol Eng Comput 2006;44:895-906. (Pubitemid 44530561)
14. Pasquier G, Ducharne G, Ali ES, et al. Total hip arthroplasty offset measurement: is C T scan the most accurate option? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010;96:367-375.
15. Akbar M, Aldinger G, Krahmer K, Bruckner T, Aldinger PR. Custom stems for femoral deformity in patients less than 40 years of age: 70 hips followed for an average of 14 years. Acta Orthop 2009;80:420-425.
16. Billing L. Roentgen examination of the proximal femur end in children and adolescents: a standardized technique also suitable for determination of the collum-, ante-version-, and epiphyseal angles; a study of slipped epiphysis and coxa plana. Acta Radiol Suppl 1954;110:1-80.
17. Murphy SB, Simon SR, Kijewski PK, Wilkinson RH, Griscom NT. Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1987;69-A:1169-1176. (Pubitemid 18005452)
18. Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E. A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:610-614. (Pubitemid 28433796)
19. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310. (Pubitemid 16134762)
20. Fackler CD, Poss R. Dislocation in total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 1980;151:169-178.
21. Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD. Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:1832-1842. (Pubitemid 47229894)
22. Little NJ, Busch CA, Gallagher JA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset. Clin Orthop 2009;467:2895-2900.
23. Eckrich SG, Noble PC, Tullos HS. Effect of rotation on the radiographic appearance of the femoral canal. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:419-426. (Pubitemid 24266586)
24. Husmann O, Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, de Roguin B, Argenson JN. Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:444-450. (Pubitemid 29023768)
25. Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaulé PE, et al. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90- A(Suppl):47-66.
26. Menschik F. The hip joint as a conchoid shape. J Biomech 1997;30:971-973. (Pubitemid 27410003)
27. Yoshioka Y, Siu D, Cooke TD. The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1987;69-A:873-880. (Pubitemid 17162610)
28. Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, et al. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop 1988;235:148-165.
29. Unnanuntana A, Toogood P, Hart D, Cooperman D, Grant RE. Evaluation of proximal femoral geometry using digital photographs. J Orthop Res 2010;28:1399-1404.
30. Nakahara I, Takao M, Sakai T, et al. Gender differences in 3D morphology and bony impingement of human hips. J Orthop Res 2011;29:333-339.
31. Atkinson HD, Johal KS, Willis-Owen C, Zadow S, Oakeshott RD. Differences in hip morphology between the sexes in patients undergoing hip resurfacing. J Orthop Surg Res 2010;5:76.