Total hip arthroplasty offset measurement: Is C T scan the most accurate option?

Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research

Volumn 96, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 367-375

  Pasquier, G ^a,b,c   Ducharne, G ^a   Sari Ali, E ^d   Giraud, F ^a   Mouttet, A ^e   Durante, E ^f  

^a Hopital Victor Provo   (France)

^b UNIV LILLE   (France)

^c LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^e Multispecialty Private Hospital   (France)

^f Computer Engineering Department ^*  (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Femoral offset; Leg length discrepancy; Preoperative planning; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG LENGTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TELEMETRY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMUR; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SURGERY;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77953233247     PISSN: 18770568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bourne R., and Rorabeck C. Soft tissue balancing, the hip. J Arthroplasty 17 4 Suppl. 1 (2002) 17-22
2. Suh K.T., Kang J.H., Roh H.L., Moon K.P., and Kim H.J. True femoral anteversion during primary total hip arthroplasty. Use of postoperative computed tomography-based sections. J Arthroplasty 21 (2006) 599-605
3. Olivecrona H., Weidenhielm L., Olivecrona L., et al. A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty, a study of 10 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 75 (2004) 252-260
4. Sariali E., Mouttet A., Pasquier G., and Durante E. Three dimensional hip anatomy in osteoarthritis, analysis of the femoral offset. J Arthroplasty 24 (2009) 990-997
5. Charles M., Bourne R., Davey R., Greenwald S., Morrey B., and Rorabeck C. Soft tissue balancing of the hip, the role of femoral offset restoration. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 86 (2004) 1078-1088
6. Nishii T., Sugano N., Miki H., Koyama T., Takao M., and Yoshikawa H. Influence of component positions on dislocation Computed tomographic evaluations in a consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 162-166
7. Noble P.C., Sugano N., Johnston J., Thompson M., Conditt M., Engh C., et al. Computer simulation: how can it help the surgeon to optimize implant position. Clin Orthop 417 (2003) 242-252
8. Seel M.J., Hafez M.A., Eckman K., Jramaz B., Davidson D., and Di Gioia A.M. Three-dimensional planning and virtual radiographs in revision total hip arthroplasty for instability. Clin Orthop 442 (2006) 35-38
9. Flecher X., Argenson J.N., Paratte S., Ryembault E., and Aubaniac J.M. Tiges fémorales sur mesure non cimentées pour séquelle de dysplasie et luxation congénitale de hanche. Rev Chir Orthop 92 (2006) 332-342
10. Argenson J.N., Ryembault E., Flecher X., Paratte S., and Aubaniac J.M. Three dimensional anatomy of the hip in osteoarthrosis after developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87 (2005) 1192-1196
11. Murray D.W. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 75 (1993) 228-232
12. Noble P.C., Alexander J.W., Lindhal L.J., Yew D.T., Granberry W.M., and Tullos H.S. The anatomic basis of the femoral component design. Clin Orthop 235 (1988) 148-162
13. Rubin P.J., Leyvraz P.F., Aubaniac J.M., Argenson J.N., Esteve P., and Deroguin B. The morphology of the proximal femur a three-dimensional radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 74 (1992) 28-32
14. Eggli S., Pisan M., and Muller M.E. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 80 (1998) 382-390
15. De Thomasson E., Mazel C., Guingand O., and Terracher R. Etude critique des résultats de la planification préopératoire sur l'anatomie de la hanche prothésée. Rev Chir Orthop 88 (2002) 229-235
16. Mc Grory B., Morrey B., Cahalan T., An K., and Cabanela M. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 77 (1995) 865-869
17. Asayama I., Chamnongkich S., Simpson K., Kinsey T., and Mahoney O. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthropasty 20 (2005) 414-420
18. Noble P.C., Kamaric E., Sugano N., Matsubara M., Harada Y., Ohzono K., et al. Three-dimensional shape of the dysplasic femur: implications for THR. Clin Orthop 417 (2003) 27-34
19. Argenson J.N., Flecher X., Paratte S., and Aubaniac J.M. Anatomy of the dysplasic hip and consequences for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 465 (2007) 40-45
20. Massin P., Geais L., Astoin E., Simondi M., and Lavaste F. The anatomic basis for the concept of lateralized femoral stem A frontal plane radiographic study of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty 15 (2000) 93-101
21. Ranawat C.S., Rao R.R., Rodriguez J.A., and Bhende H.S. Correction of limb-length inequality during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16 (2001) 715-720
22. Jasty M., Webster W., and Harris W. Management of limb length inequality during total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 333 (1996) 165-171
23. Maloney W.J., and Keeney J.A. Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21 (2006) 108-110
24. Konyves A., and Bannister G.C. The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87 (2005) 155-157
25. Krishnan S., Carrington R., Mohiyaddin S., and Garlick N. Common misconceptions of the normal hip joint, relations on pelvic radiographs. J Arthroplasty 21 (2006) 409-412