Review of Adaptive Training System Techniques

Military Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 96-113

  Landsberg, Carla R ^a   Astwood, Randy S ^a   Van Buskirk, Wendi L ^a   Townsend, Lisa N ^a   Steinhauser, Natalie B ^a   Mercado, Alyssa D ^b  

^a NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER   (United States)

^b Kaegan Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860295045     PISSN: 08995605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2012.672903     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Balzer, W. K., Hammer, L. B., Sumner, K. E., Birchenough, T. R., Martens, S. P. and Raymark, P. H. 1994. Effects of cognitive feedback components, display format, and elaboration on performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58: 369-385.
2. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A. and Morgan, M. T. 1991. The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2): 213-238.
3. Bauer, K. N., Brusso, R. C. and Orvis, K. A. 2012, this issue. Using adaptive difficulty to optimize videogame-based training performance: The moderating role of personality. Military Psychology, 24(2): 148-165.
4. Billings, D. R. 2012, this issue. Efficacy of adaptive feedback strategies in simulation-based training. Military Psychology, 24(2): 114-133.
5. Block, J. H. 1980. Promising excellence through mastery learning. Theory and Practice, 19: 66-74.
6. Bloom, B. S. 1984. The 2-sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6): 4-16.
7. Boblin, S. L. and Gibson, B. 1986. Computer managed instruction at the University of Alberta Hospital's School of Nursing (Unpublished master's project report), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta.
8. Buff, W. L. and Campbell, G. E. 2002. "What to do or what not to do?: Identifying the content of effective feedback". In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2074-2078. Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
9. Charoula, A., Valanides, N. and Kirschner, P. 2009. Field dependence-independence and instructional-design effects on learners' performance with a computer-modeling tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 25: 1355-1366.
10. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. London, England: Learning and Skills Research Centre. http://www.lsda.org.uk/files/PDF/1543.pdf.
11. Davis, J. K. 1991. "Educational implications of field dependence-independence". In Field dependence/independence: Cognitive style across the life span, Edited by: Wapner, S. and Demick, J. 149-76. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Deutsch, T. and Tobias, S. Prior achievement, anxiety, and instructional method. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
13. Flanagan, J. C., Shanner, W. M., Brudner, H. J. and Marker, R. W. 1975. "An individualized instructional system: PLAN". In Systems of individualized education, Edited by: Talmage, H. 136-167. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.
14. Glaser, R. and Nitko, A. J. 1971. "Measurement in learning and instruction". In Educational Measurement, 2nd, Edited by: Thorudike, R. L. 625-670. Washington, DC: American Council of Education.
15. Gopher, D., Williges, B. H., Williges, R. C. and Damos, D. L. 1975. Varying the type and number of adaptive variables in continuous tracking. Journal of Motor Behavior, 7(3): 159-170.
16. Graesser, A. C., Conley, M. W. and Olney, A. M. 2012. "Intelligent tutoring systems". In APA educational psychology handbook, Edited by: Urdan, T., Harris, K. R. and Graham, S. 451-473. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. Horak, V. M. and Horak, W. J. 1982. The influence of student locus of control and teaching method on mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Education, 51: 18-21.
18. Johnson, D. F. and Haygood, R. C. 1984. The use of secondary tasks in adaptive training. Human Factors, 26: 105-108.
19. Kalyuga, S. 2005. "Prior knowledge principle in multimedia learning". In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, Edited by: Mayer, R. 325-338. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
20. Keller, F. S. 1974. Ten years of personalized instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 1: 4-9.
21. Kelley, C. R. 1969. What is adaptive training?. Human Factors, 11(6): 547-556.
22. Kluger, A. N. and DeNisi, A. 1996. The effects of feedback interventions of performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2): 254-284.
23. Kot, P., Skillen, L. D. and Wales, M. 1986. Learning effectiveness and efficiency using computer managed learning and lecture for health assessment theory, Edmonton: University of Alberta, Canada.
24. Kozlowski, S.W.J., Toney, R. J., Mullins, M. E., Weissbein, D. A., Brown, K. G. and Bell, B. S. 2001. "Developing adaptability: A theory for the design of integrated-embedded training systems". In Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research, Edited by: Salas, E. Vol. 1, 59-123. Amsterdam, Netherlands: JAI/Elsevier Science.
25. Landsberg, C. R., Van Buskirk, W. L. and Astwood, R. S. Does feedback type matter? Investigating the effectiveness of feedback content on performance outcomes. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting [CD ROM]. 2010.
26. Landsberg, C. R., Van Buskirk, W. L., Astwood, R. S., Mercado, A. D., & Aarke, A. J. (2011). Adaptive training considerations for use in simulation-based systems (Special Report 2010-001). Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA535421&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf.
27. Leutner, D. and Plass, J. L. 1998. Measuring learning styles with observational versus direct observation of preferential choice behavior in authentic learning situations: The visualizer/verbalizer behavior observation scale (VV-BOS). Computers in Human Behavior, 14(4): 543-557.
28. Mané, A. M. 1984. Acquisition of perceptual-motor skill: Adaptive and part-whole training. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 28: 522-526.
29. Massa, L. J. and Mayer, R. E. 2006. Testing the ATI hypothesis: Should multimedia instruction accommodate verbalizer-visualizer cognitive style?. Learning and Individual Differences, 16: 321-336.
30. Messick, S. 1994. The matter of style: Manifestations of personality in cognition, learning and teaching. Educational Psychologist, 29: 121-136.
31. Mödritscher, F., Garcia-Barrios, V. M. and Gutl, C. The past, the present and the future of adaptive e-learning: An approach within the scope of the research project AdeLE. Proceedings of the Interactive Computer Aided Learning Conference. Villach, Austria. 2004.
32. Naval Aviation Enterprise (2010). Report on the NAE Science and Technology Objectives. http://www.public.navy.mil/airfor/nae/Documents/2010%20STO.pdf.
33. Norman, D. A. and Matheny, W. G. 1972. Need for within-trial feedback as a function of task similarity in adaptive training of manual control. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 16(1): 136-139.
34. Park, O. and Lee, J. 2003. "Adaptive instructional systems". In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, Edited by: Jonassen, D. 651-684. New York, NY: MacMillan Publishers.
35. Park, O. and Tennyson, R. D. 1980. Adaptive design strategies for selecting number and presentation order of examples in coordinate concept acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3): 362-370.
36. Park, O. and Tennyson, R. D. 1986. Computer-based response-sensitive design strategies for selecting presentation form and sequence of examples in learning of coordinate concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2): 153-158.
37. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D. and Bjork, R. 2009. Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9: 105-119.
38. Pask, G. 1957. Automatic teaching techniques. British Communication and Electronics, 4: 210-211.
39. Pew, R. W. and Mavor, A. S., eds. 1998. Modeling human and organizational behavior, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
40. Richardson, A. 1977. Verbalizer-Visualizer: A cognitive style dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1: 109-126.
41. Romero, C., Ventura, S., Gibaja, E. L., Hervas, C. and Romero, F. 2006. Web-based adaptive training simulator system for cardiac life support. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 38(1): 67-78.
42. Rotter, J. B. 1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external locus of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General & Applied, 80(1): 1-28.
43. Shin, E. C., Schallert, D. L. and Savenye, W. C. 1994. Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students' learning in a hypertext environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42: 33-46.
44. Shute, V. and Towle, B. 2003. Adaptive e-learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(2): 105-114.
45. Shute, V. J. and Zapata-Rivera, D. 2008. "Adaptive technologies". In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 3rd, Edited by: Spector, J. M., Merrill, D., van Merriënboer, J. and Driscoll, M. 277-294. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Shyu, H. S. and Brown, S. W. 1992. Learner control versus program control in interactive videodisc instruction: What are the effects of procedural learning?. International Journal of Instructional Media, 19(2): 85-96.
47. Smither, J. W., Wohlers, A. J. and London, M. 1995. A field study of reactions to normative versus individualized upward feedback. Group & Organization Management, 20: 61-89.
48. Snow, E. R. 1980. Aptitude, learner control, and adaptive instruction. Educational Psychologist, 15: 151-158.
49. Snow, E. R. and Lohman, D. F. 1984. Toward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76: 347-376.
50. Stottler, R. H., & Vinkavich, M. (2006). Tactical Action Officer Intelligent Tutoring System (TAO ITS). Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA454597.
51. Szabo, M. and Montgomerie, T. C. 1992. CMI research at the University of Alberta in context. The Journal of Research on Computing Education, 25: 113-133.
52. Tennyson, R. D. and Christensen, D. L. 1988. "MAIS: An intelligent learning system". In Instructional designs for micro-computer courseware, Edited by: Jonassen, D. 247-274. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Tennyson, R. D. and Park, O. 1987. "Artificial intelligence and computer-based learning". In Instructional technology: Foundations, Edited by: Gagné, R. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54. Tennyson, R. D. and Rothen, W. 1977. Pretask and on-task adaptive design strategies for selecting number of instances in concept acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(5): 586-592.
55. Tobias, S. 1994. Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64: 37-54.
56. Van Buskirk, W., Cornejo, J., Astwood, R., Russell, S., Dorsey, D. and Dalton, J. 2009. "A theoretical framework for developing systematic instructional guidance for virtual environment training". In The PSI handbook of virtual environments for training: Vol. 1. Learning, Requirements, and Metrics, Edited by: Schmorrow, D., Cohn, J. and Nicholson, D. 97-113. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.
57. Yeany, R. H., Dost, R. J. and Mattews, R. W. 1980. The effects of diagnostic-prescriptive instruction and locus of control on the achievement and attitudes of university students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17: 537-546.