메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 79, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1449-1504

Seminole rock's domain

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 84860283449     PISSN: 00168076     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (41)

References (242)
  • 4
    • 77952051596 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 519 U.S. 452
    • Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997).
    • (1997) Auer v. Robbins
  • 5
    • 0009388990 scopus 로고
    • Judicial review of questions of law and policy
    • 363
    • Stephen Breyer, Judicial Review of Questions of Law and Policy, 38 ADMIN. L. REV. 363, 370 (1986).
    • (1986) Admin. L. Rev. , vol.38 , pp. 370
    • Breyer, S.1
  • 6
    • 0347664773 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Presidential administration
    • 2245
    • Elena Kagan, Presidential Administration, 114 HARV. L. REV. 2245, 2379-80 (2001).
    • (2001) Harv. L. Rev. , vol.114 , pp. 2379-2380
    • Kagan, E.1
  • 7
    • 0040608318 scopus 로고
    • Judicial deference to administrative interpretations of law
    • 511, Prominent scholars have also endorsed this understanding as providing the best account of the Chevron doctrine
    • Antonin Scalia, Judicial Deference to Administrative Interpretations of Law, 1989 DUKE L.J. 511, 517. Prominent scholars have also endorsed this understanding as providing the best account of the Chevron doctrine.
    • (1989) Duke L.J. , pp. 517
    • Scalia, A.1
  • 8
    • 0346403923 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chevron's domain
    • 833
    • Thomas W. Merrill & Kristin E. Hickman, Chevron's Domain, 89 GEO. L.J. 833, 836 (2001).
    • (2001) Geo. L.J. , vol.89 , pp. 836
    • Merrill, T.W.1    Hickman, K.E.2
  • 9
    • 0039012832 scopus 로고
    • Law and administration after chevron
    • 2071
    • Cass R. Sunstein, Law and Administration After Chevron, 90 COLUM. L. REV. 2071, 2086 (1990).
    • (1990) Colum. L. Rev. , vol.90 , pp. 2086
    • Sunstein, C.R.1
  • 10
    • 33744467723 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chevron step zero
    • Cass R. Sunstein, Chevron Step Zero, 92 VA. L. REV. 187 (2006).
    • (2006) Va. L. Rev. , vol.92 , pp. 187
    • Sunstein, C.R.1
  • 11
    • 0039689862 scopus 로고
    • Which agency interpretations should bind citizens and the courts?
    • 1
    • Robert A. Anthony, Which Agency Interpretations Should Bind Citizens and the Courts?, 7 YALE J. ON REG. 1, 14-15 (1990).
    • (1990) YALE J. On Reg. , vol.7 , pp. 14-15
    • Anthony, R.A.1
  • 12
    • 33644611942 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Making consistency consistent
    • 995
    • Yoav Dotan, Making Consistency Consistent, 57 ADMIN. L. REV. 995, 1019 (2005).
    • (2005) Admin. L. Rev. , vol.57 , pp. 1019
    • Dotan, Y.1
  • 13
    • 36549051255 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In Search of the modern skidmore standard
    • 1235, 1243
    • Kristin E. Hickman & Matthew D. Krueger, In Search of the Modern Skidmore Standard, 107 COLUM. L. REV. 1235, 1243, 1257-58 (2007).
    • (2007) Colum. L. Rev. , vol.107 , pp. 1257-1258
    • Hickman, K.E.1    Krueger, M.D.2
  • 14
    • 0042540004 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Constitutional structure and judicial deference to agency interpretations of agency rules
    • 612
    • John F. Manning, Constitutional Structure and Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations of Agency Rules, 96 COLUM. L. REV. 612, 623-25 (1996).
    • (1996) Colum. L. Rev. , vol.96 , pp. 623-625
    • Manning, J.F.1
  • 15
    • 0039012787 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The supreme court and the APA: Sometimes they just don't get It
    • 1, 17-23
    • Robert A. Anthony, The Supreme Court and the APA: Sometimes They Just Don't Get It, 10 ADMIN. L.J. AM. U. 1, 17-23, 25-26 (1996).
    • (1996) Admin. L.J. Am. U. , vol.10 , pp. 25-26
    • Anthony, R.A.1
  • 19
    • 84939792058 scopus 로고
    • Office of Thrift Supervision, 59 F.3d. 212, 216-17, D.C. Cir
    • Rapaport v. U.S. Dep't of the Treasury, Office of Thrift Supervision, 59 F.3d. 212, 216-17 (D.C. Cir. 1995).
    • (1995) Rapaport v. U.S. Dep't of the Treasury
  • 23
    • 77950643619 scopus 로고
    • 480 U.S. 421, 446 n.30
    • INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 446 n.30 (1987).
    • (1987) INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca
  • 25
    • 70849134744 scopus 로고
    • 500 U.S. 173, 186-87
    • Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173, 186-87 (1991).
    • (1991) Rust v. Sullivan
  • 26
    • 58149110064 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 549 U.S. 497
    • Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497, 534-35 (2007).
    • (2007) Massachusetts v. EPA , pp. 534-535
  • 28
    • 79251535647 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reincarnating the "major questions" exception to chevron deference as a doctrine of noninterference (or why massachusetts v. EPA got it wrong)
    • 593
    • Abigail R. Moncrieff, Reincarnating the "Major Questions" Exception to Chevron Deference As a Doctrine of Noninterference (or Why Massachusetts v. EPA Got It Wrong), 60 ADMIN. L. REV. 593, 594-95 (2008).
    • (2008) Admin. L. Rev. , vol.60 , pp. 594-595
    • Moncrieff, A.R.1
  • 29
    • 0039561177 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chevron's nondelegation doctrine
    • David J. Barron & Elena Kagan, Chevron's Nondelegation Doctrine, 2001 SUP. CT. REV. 201.
    • (2001) Sup. Ct. Rev. , pp. 201
    • Barron, D.J.1    Kagan, E.2
  • 30
    • 63549085167 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chevron's mistake
    • Lisa Schultz Bressman, Chevron's Mistake, 58 DUKE L.J. 549 (2009).
    • (2009) Duke L.J. , vol.58 , pp. 549
    • Bressman, L.S.1
  • 31
    • 71849102350 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hiding in plain sight? Timing and transparency in the administrative state
    • 1157
    • Jacob E. Gersen & Anne Joseph O'Connell, Hiding in Plain Sight? Timing and Transparency in the Administrative State, 76 U. CHI. L. REV. 1157, 1198-1201 (2009).
    • (2009) U. Chi. L. Rev. , vol.76 , pp. 1198-1201
    • Gersen, J.E.1    O'connell, A.J.2
  • 32
    • 84860300355 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Democratizing the administrative state
    • 559, 584-85
    • Richard J. Pierce Jr., Democratizing the Administrative State, 48 WM. & MARY L. REV. 559, 584-85, 610-11 (2006).
    • (2006) Wm. & Mary L. Rev. , vol.48 , pp. 610-611
    • Pierce Jr., R.J.1
  • 33
    • 31144437358 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How mead has muddled judicial review of agency action
    • Lisa Schultz Bressman, How Mead Has Muddled Judicial Review of Agency Action, 58 VAND. L. REV. 1443 (2005).
    • (2005) Vand. L. Rev. , vol.58 , pp. 1443
    • Bressman, L.S.1
  • 34
    • 0036018161 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The mead doctrine: Rules and standards, meta-rules and meta-standards
    • 807
    • Thomas W. Merrill, The Mead Doctrine: Rules and Standards, Meta-Rules and Meta-Standards, 54 ADMIN. L. REV. 807, 809 (2002).
    • (2002) Admin. L. Rev. , vol.54 , pp. 809
    • Merrill, T.W.1
  • 35
    • 33947129105 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The strategic substitution effect: Textual plausibility, procedural formality, and judicial review of agency statutory interpretations
    • 528
    • Matthew C. Stephenson, The Strategic Substitution Effect: Textual Plausibility, Procedural Formality, and Judicial Review of Agency Statutory Interpretations, 120 HARV. L. REV. 528, 533-34 (2006).
    • (2006) Harv. L. Rev. , vol.120 , pp. 533-534
    • Stephenson, M.C.1
  • 36
    • 0041654692 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Introduction, mead in the trenches
    • 347
    • Adrian Vermeule, Introduction, Mead in the Trenches, 71 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 347, 347 (2003).
    • (2003) Geo. Wash. L. Rev. , vol.71 , pp. 347
    • Vermeule, A.1
  • 37
    • 84864045459 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Shoring up chevron: A defense of seminole rock deference to agency regulatory interpretations
    • 49
    • Scott H. Angstreich, Shoring Up Chevron: A Defense of Seminole Rock Deference to Agency Regulatory Interpretations, 34 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 49, 112 (2000).
    • (2000) U.C. Davis L. Rev. , vol.34 , pp. 112
    • Angstreich, S.H.1
  • 38
    • 0347710223 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Publication rules in the rulemaking spectrum: Assuring proper respect for an essential element
    • 803, 832-33
    • Peter L. Strauss, Publication Rules in the Rulemaking Spectrum: Assuring Proper Respect for an Essential Element, 53 ADMIN. L. REV. 803, 832-33, 838 (2001).
    • (2001) Admin. L. Rev. , vol.53 , pp. 838
    • Strauss, P.L.1
  • 43
    • 78149429197 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 347 F.3d 990, 993, (7th Cir.)
    • Keys v. Barnhart, 347 F.3d 990, 993 (7th Cir. 2003).
    • (2003) Keys v. Barnhart
  • 47
    • 84860311137 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 397 F.3d 1285, 1296 (10th Cir.)
    • Excel Corp. v. USDA, 397 F.3d 1285, 1296 (10th Cir. 2005).
    • (2005) Excel Corp. v. USDA
  • 48
    • 84860311165 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 375 F.3d 301, 306, (4th Cir.)
    • Humanoids Grp. v. Rogan, 375 F.3d 301, 306 (4th Cir. 2004).
    • (2004) Humanoids Grp. v. Rogan
  • 51
    • 84860272614 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 313 F.3d 768, 780 n.7 (2d Cir.)
    • Taylor v. Vt. Dep't of Educ., 313 F.3d 768, 780 n.7 (2d Cir. 2002).
    • (2002) Taylor v. Vt. Dep't of Educ.
  • 52
    • 84860303369 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 262 F.3d 1376, 1382-83, (Fed. Cir.)
    • Am. Express Co. v. United States, 262 F.3d 1376, 1382-83 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
    • (2001) Am. Express Co. v. United States
  • 53
    • 84860309031 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mine Safety & Health Review Comm'n, 212 F.3d 1301, 1304 (D.C. Cir.)
    • Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc. v. Fed. Mine Safety & Health Review Comm'n, 212 F.3d 1301, 1304 (D.C. Cir. 2000).
    • (2000) Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc. v. Fed
  • 54
    • 0347424570 scopus 로고
    • Must federal courts defer to agency interpretations of statutes?: A new doctrinal basis for chevron U.S.A. v. Natural resources defense council
    • 1275
    • Maureen B. Callahan, Must Federal Courts Defer to Agency Interpretations of Statutes?: A New Doctrinal Basis for Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 1991 WIS. L. REV. 1275, 1281-83.
    • (1991) Wis. L. Rev. , pp. 1281-1283
    • Callahan, M.B.1
  • 58
    • 84860279063 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 451 F.3d 831, 837k, (Fed. Cir.)
    • Gose v. U.S. Postal Serv., 451 F.3d 831, 837 (Fed. Cir. 2006).
    • (2006) Gose v. U.S. Postal Serv.
  • 59
    • 84860311139 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 400 F.3d 1352, 1363-64 (Fed. Cir.)
    • Cathedral Candle Co. v. ITC, 400 F.3d 1352, 1363-64 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
    • (2005) Cathedral Candle Co. v. ITC
  • 60
    • 84860285034 scopus 로고
    • 152 F.2d 713, 718, (9th Cir.)
    • F. Uri & Co. v. Bowles, 152 F.2d 713, 718 (9th Cir. 1945).
    • (1945) F. Uri & Co. v. Bowles
  • 61
    • 84860311167 scopus 로고
    • 68 F. Su 103, 108, 110, D. Minn
    • Porter v. Tankar Gas, Inc., 68 F. Supp. 103, 108, 110 (D. Minn. 1946).
    • (1946) Porter v. Tankar Gas, Inc.
  • 62
    • 77950512040 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 129 S. Ct. 1800, 1826 (Stevens, J. dissenting
    • FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 129 S. Ct. 1800, 1826 (2009) (Stevens, J., dissenting).
    • (2009) FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
  • 63
    • 84860272645 scopus 로고
    • 380 U.S. 1, 16-17
    • Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16-17 (1965).
    • (1965) Udall v. Tallman
  • 65
  • 67
    • 84860285032 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 255 F.3d 998, 1005, (9th Cir.)
    • See Lal v. INS, 255 F.3d 998, 1005 (9th Cir. 2001).
    • (2001) See Lal v. INS
  • 68
    • 0345813258 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Divining regulatory intent: The place for a "legislative history" of agency rules
    • 255
    • Lars Noah, Divining Regulatory Intent: The Place for a "Legislative History" of Agency Rules, 51 HASTINGS L.J. 255, 293 (2000).
    • (2000) Hastings L.J , vol.51 , pp. 293
    • Noah, L.1
  • 71
    • 77952051596 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 519 U.S. 452, 462
    • Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452, 462 (1997).
    • (1997) Auer v. Robbins
  • 73
    • 84860311140 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 583 F.3d 1331, 1335 (Fed. Cir.)
    • Reizenstein v. Shinseki, 583 F.3d 1331, 1335 (Fed. Cir. 2009).
    • (2009) Reizenstein v. Shinseki
  • 74
    • 84860272615 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 451 F.3d 1344, 1350-51, (Fed. Cir.)
    • Smith v. Nicholson, 451 F.3d 1344, 1350-51 (Fed. Cir. 2006).
    • (2006) Smith v. Nicholson
  • 75
    • 84860311165 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 375 F.3d 301, 307 (4th Cir.)
    • Humanoids Grp. v. Rogan, 375 F.3d 301, 307 (4th Cir. 2004).
    • (2004) Humanoids Grp. v. Rogan
  • 77
    • 84860285035 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 217 F.3d 875, 878, (D.C. Cir.)
    • Bigelow v. Dep't of Def., 217 F.3d 875, 878 (D.C. Cir. 2000).
    • (2000) Bigelow v. Dep't of Def.
  • 84
    • 33746384006 scopus 로고
    • 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137
    • Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177 (1803).
    • (1803) Marbury v. Madison , pp. 177
  • 94
    • 84860309035 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 82 F.3d 165, 170, (7th Cir.)
    • Hoctor v. USDA, 82 F.3d 165, 170 (7th Cir. 1996).
    • (1996) Hoctor v. USDA
  • 97
    • 84860311144 scopus 로고
    • 27 F.3d 1, 5, 1st Cir.
    • Davila-Bardales v. INS, 27 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 1994).
    • (1994) Davila-Bardales v. INS
  • 99
    • 77958405926 scopus 로고
    • Prodelegation: Why administrators should make political decisions
    • 81
    • Jerry L. Mashaw, Prodelegation: Why Administrators Should Make Political Decisions, 1 J.L. ECON. & ORG. 81, 94-99 (1985).
    • (1985) J.L. Econ. & Org. , vol.1 , pp. 94-99
    • Mashaw, J.L.1
  • 100
    • 0347036782 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Presidential review as constitutional restoration
    • 901
    • John O. McGinnis, Presidential Review as Constitutional Restoration, 51 DUKE L.J. 901, 932-38 (2001).
    • (2001) Duke L.J. , vol.51 , pp. 932-938
    • Mcginnis, J.O.1
  • 101
    • 33747076145 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The fable of the nationalist president and the parochial congress
    • 1217
    • Jide Nzelibe, The Fable of the Nationalist President and the Parochial Congress, 53 UCLA L. REV. 1217, 1265-67 (2006).
    • (2006) Ucla L. Rev. , vol.53 , pp. 1265-1267
    • Nzelibe, J.1
  • 102
    • 84890625573 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Statutory interpretation by agencies
    • 285, Daniel A. Ferber & Anne Joseph O'Connell eds.
    • Matthew C. Stephenson, Statutory Interpretation by Agencies, in RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON PUBLIC CHOICE AND PUBLIC LAW 285, 286-92 (Daniel A. Ferber & Anne Joseph O'Connell eds., 2010).
    • (2010) Research Handbook on Public Choice and Public Law , pp. 286-292
    • Stephenson, M.C.1
  • 105
    • 84860290373 scopus 로고
    • 742 F.2d 1561, 1565 (D.C. Cir.), (en banc)
    • Gen. Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F.2d 1561, 1565 (D.C. Cir. 1984) (en banc).
    • (1984) Gen. Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus
  • 106
    • 38049031903 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Legislative rules revisited
    • 1705
    • Jacob E. Gersen, Legislative Rules Revisited, 74 U. CHI. L. REV. 1705, 1705 (2007).
    • (2007) U. Chi. L. Rev. , vol.74 , pp. 1705
    • Gersen, J.E.1
  • 107
    • 7644235746 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nonlegislative rules
    • 893
    • John F. Manning, Nonlegislative Rules, 72 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 893, 893-94 (2004).
    • (2004) Geo. Wash. L. Rev. , vol.72 , pp. 893-894
    • Manning, J.F.1
  • 111
    • 79551550754 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 208 F.3d 1015, 1021 (D.C. Cir.)
    • Appalachian Power Co. v. EPA, 208 F.3d 1015, 1021 (D.C. Cir. 2000).
    • (2000) Appalachian Power Co. v. EPA
  • 113
    • 84860309035 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 82 F.3d 165, 170 (7th Cir.)
    • Hoctor v. USDA, 82 F.3d 165, 170 (7th Cir. 1996).
    • (1996) Hoctor v. USDA
  • 114
    • 84860272619 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 995 F.2d at 1109-11
    • Am. Mining Cong., 995 F.2d at 1109-11.
    • Am. Mining Cong.
  • 115
  • 116
    • 84860297430 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The court's deferences-A foolish inconsistency
    • 10
    • Robert A. Anthony & Michael Asimow, The Court's Deferences-a Foolish Inconsistency, 26 ADMIN. & REG. L. NEWS 10, 10 (2000).
    • (2000) Admin. & Reg. L. News , vol.26 , pp. 10
    • Anthony, R.A.1    Asimow, M.2
  • 117
    • 21144484708 scopus 로고
    • Re-inventing rulemaking
    • 1490
    • E. Donald Elliott, Re-Inventing Rulemaking, 41 DUKE L.J. 1490, 1491-92 (1992).
    • (1992) Duke L.J. , vol.41 , pp. 1491-1492
    • Elliott, E.D.1
  • 118
  • 119
    • 23044520555 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interpretive choice
    • 74
    • Adrian Vermeule, Interpretive Choice, 75 N.Y.U. L. REV. 74, 142 (2000).
    • (2000) N.Y.U. L. Rev. , vol.75 , pp. 142
    • Vermeule, A.1
  • 120
    • 0040161655 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Foreword, implementing the constitution
    • 54
    • Richard H. Fallon, Jr., Foreword, Implementing the Constitution, 111 HARV. L. REV. 54, 62 (1997).
    • (1997) Harv. L. Rev. , vol.111 , pp. 62
    • Fallon Jr., R.H.1
  • 121
    • 0346361441 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interpretation and institutions
    • 885
    • Cass R. Sunstein & Adrian Vermeule, Interpretation and Institutions, 101 MICH. L. REV. 885, 889 (2003).
    • (2003) Mich. L. Rev. , vol.101 , pp. 889
    • Sunstein, C.R.1    Vermeule, A.2
  • 123
    • 84860309036 scopus 로고
    • 512 U.S. 504, 525 (Thomas, J. dissenting)
    • Thomas Jefferson Univ. v. Shalala, 512 U.S. 504, 525 (1994) (Thomas, J., dissenting).
    • (1994) Thomas Jefferson Univ. v. Shalala
  • 124
  • 125
    • 71849118947 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 546 U.S. 243, 257
    • Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243, 257 (2006).
    • (2006) Gonzales v. Oregon
  • 126
    • 78650804593 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 283 F.3d 953, 962, (8th Cir.)
    • Glover v. Standard Fed. Bank, 283 F.3d 953, 962 (8th Cir. 2002).
    • (2002) Glover v. Standard Fed. Bank
  • 127
    • 78650821305 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 259 F.3d 303, 307 n.1 (4th Cir.)
    • Cunningham v. Scibana, 259 F.3d 303, 307 n.1 (4th Cir. 2001).
    • (2001) Cunningham v. Scibana
  • 129
    • 84860309035 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 82 F.3d 165, 170-71 (7th Cir.)
    • Hoctor v. USDA, 82 F.3d 165, 170-71 (7th Cir. 1996).
    • (1996) Hoctor v. USDA
  • 130
    • 84860296911 scopus 로고
    • Dir. Office of Workers' Comp. Programs, 826 F.2d 1318, 1324-25 (3d Cir
    • Dir., Office of Workers' Comp. Programs, U.S. Dep't of Labor v. Mangifest, 826 F.2d 1318, 1324-25 (3d Cir. 1987).
    • (1987) U.S. Dep't of Labor v. Mangifest
  • 132
    • 0348080696 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nondelegation canons
    • 315
    • Cass R. Sunstein, Nondelegation Canons, 67 U. CHI. L. REV. 315, 318-19 (2000).
    • (2000) U. Chi. L. Rev. , vol.67 , pp. 318-319
    • Sunstein, C.R.1
  • 135
    • 84860311147 scopus 로고
    • 394 U.S. 759, 764, plurality opinion
    • NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co., 394 U.S. 759, 764 (1969) (plurality opinion).
    • (1969) NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co.
  • 136
    • 71849103982 scopus 로고
    • 332 U.S. 194, 215-17 (Jackson, J. dissenting)
    • SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194, 215-17 (1947) (Jackson, J., dissenting).
    • (1947) SEC v. Chenery Corp.
  • 137
    • 84860272620 scopus 로고
    • 475 F.2d 485, 495-96 (2d. Cir.), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 416 U.S. 267 (1974
    • Bell Aerospace Co. v. NLRB, 475 F.2d 485, 495-96 (2d. Cir. 1973), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 416 U.S. 267 (1974).
    • (1973) Bell Aerospace Co. v. NLRB
  • 139
    • 73049113757 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • S.D., N.A. 517 U.S. 735, 740-41
    • Smiley v. Citibank (S.D.), N.A., 517 U.S. 735, 740-41 (1996).
    • (1996) Smiley v. Citibank
  • 141
    • 84860311153 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 350 F.3d 726, 728, (8th Cir.)
    • Advanta USA, Inc. v. Chao, 350 F.3d 726, 728 (8th Cir. 2003).
    • (2003) Advanta USA, Inc. v. Chao
  • 142
    • 84860311167 scopus 로고
    • 68 F. Su 103, 108 (D. Minn.)
    • Porter v. Tankar Gas, Inc., 68 F. Supp. 103, 108 (D. Minn. 1946).
    • (1946) Porter v. Tankar Gas, Inc.
  • 149
    • 77950643619 scopus 로고
    • 480 U.S. 421, 446 n.30
    • INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 446 n.30 (1987).
    • (1987) INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca
  • 150
    • 84860311164 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 619 F.3d 604, (6th Cir.)
    • Franklin v. Kellogg Co., 619 F.3d 604 (6th Cir. 2010).
    • (2010) Franklin v. Kellogg Co.
  • 152
    • 84860312566 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 558 F.3d 903, 919-20, 920 n.2, 9th Cir
    • Marmolejo-Campos v. Holder, 558 F.3d 903, 919-20, 920 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
    • (2009) Marmolejo-Campos v. Holder
  • 154
    • 84860311153 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 350 F.3d 726, 730-31 (8th Cir.)
    • Advanta USA, Inc. v. Chao, 350 F.3d 726, 730-31 (8th Cir. 2003).
    • (2003) Advanta USA, Inc. v. Chao
  • 157
    • 84860310415 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 127 F.3d 90, 94-95, (D.C. Cir.)
    • Syncor Int'l Corp. v. Shalala, 127 F.3d 90, 94-95 (D.C. Cir. 1997).
    • (1997) Syncor Int'l Corp. v. Shalala
  • 160
    • 84860285034 scopus 로고
    • 152 F.2d 713, 715-19 (9th Cir.)
    • F. Uri & Co. v. Bowles, 152 F.2d 713, 715-19 (9th Cir. 1945).
    • (1945) F. Uri & Co. v. Bowles
  • 162
    • 0036862384 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Provisional precedent: Protecting flexibility in administrative policymaking
    • Kenneth A. Bamberger, Provisional Precedent: Protecting Flexibility in Administrative Policymaking, 77 N.Y.U. L. REV. 1272 (2002).
    • (2002) N.Y.U. L. Rev. , vol.77 , pp. 1272
    • Bamberger, K.A.1
  • 163
    • 33749480252 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chevron matters: How the chevron doctrine redefined the roles of congress, courts and agencies in environmental law
    • E. Donald Elliott, Chevron Matters: How the Chevron Doctrine Redefined the Roles of Congress, Courts and Agencies in Environmental Law, 16 VILL. ENVTL. L.J. 1 (2005).
    • (2005) Vill. Envtl. L.J. , vol.16 , pp. 1
    • Elliott, E.D.1
  • 164
    • 67650498408 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chevron has only one step
    • Matthew C. Stephenson & Adrian Vermeule, Chevron Has Only One Step, 95 VA. L. REV. 597 (2009).
    • (2009) Va. L. Rev. , vol.95 , pp. 597
    • Stephenson, M.C.1    Vermeule, A.2
  • 165
    • 84860278277 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 350 F.3d 726, (8th Cir.)
    • Advanta USA, Inc. v. Chao, 350 F.3d 726, 730-31 (8th Cir. 2003).
    • (2003) Advanta USA, Inc. v. Chao , pp. 730-731
  • 170
    • 79958751350 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Judicial deference to inconsistent agency statutory interpretations
    • 85
    • Yehonatan Givati & Matthew C. Stephenson, Judicial Deference to Inconsistent Agency Statutory Interpretations, 40 J. LEGAL STUD. 85, 86 (2011).
    • (2011) J. Legal Stud. , vol.40 , pp. 86
    • Givati, Y.1    Stephenson, M.C.2
  • 171
    • 71849103982 scopus 로고
    • 332 U.S. 194, 203
    • SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194, 203 (1947).
    • (1947) SEC v. Chenery Corp.
  • 176
  • 181
    • 84860306198 scopus 로고
    • 401 F.2d 398, 404, D.C. Cir.
    • Radio Athens, Inc. v. FCC, 401 F.2d 398, 404 (D.C. Cir. 1968).
    • (1968) Radio Athens, Inc. v. FCC
  • 191
    • 82855164318 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • End the failed chevron experiment now: How chevron has failed and why it can and should be overruled
    • 779
    • Jack M. Beermann, End the Failed Chevron Experiment Now: How Chevron Has Failed and Why It Can and Should Be Overruled, 42 CONN. L. REV. 779, 823-26 (2010).
    • (2010) Conn. L. Rev. , vol.42 , pp. 823-826
    • Beermann, J.M.1
  • 192
    • 33749159539 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Beyond marbury: The executive's power to say what the law is
    • 2580
    • Cass R. Sunstein, Beyond Marbury: The Executive's Power to Say What the Law Is, 115 YALE L.J. 2580, 2603 (2006).
    • (2006) Yale L.J. , vol.115 , pp. 2603
    • Sunstein, C.R.1
  • 193
    • 84860311165 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 375 F.3d 301, 305 (4th Cir.)
    • Humanoids Grp. v. Rogan, 375 F.3d 301, 305 (4th Cir. 2004).
    • (2004) Humanoids Grp. v. Rogan
  • 200
    • 77957858749 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 387 F.3d 42, 54-55 (1st Cir.)
    • United States v. Lachman, 387 F.3d 42, 54-55 (1st Cir. 2004).
    • (2004) United States v. Lachman
  • 203
    • 78149429197 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 347 F.3d 990, 993 (7th Cir.)
    • Keys v. Barnhart, 347 F.3d 990, 993 (7th Cir. 2003).
    • (2003) Keys v. Barnhart
  • 205
    • 84860273689 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Conservation Council, 129 S. Ct. 2458, 2469-73
    • Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Se. Alaska Conservation Council, 129 S. Ct. 2458, 2469-73 (2009).
    • (2009) Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Se. Alaska
  • 207
    • 84860311137 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 397 F.3d 1285, 1296 (10th Cir
    • Excel Corp. v. USDA, 397 F.3d 1285, 1296 (10th Cir. 2005).
    • (2005) Excel Corp. v. USDA
  • 208
    • 84860311165 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 375 F.3d 301, 307 (4th Cir.)
    • Humanoids Grp. v. Rogan, 375 F.3d 301, 307 (4th Cir. 2004).
    • (2004) Humanoids Grp. v. Rogan
  • 211
    • 84860272614 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 313 F.3d 768, 780 n.7 (2d Cir.)
    • Taylor v. Vt. Dep't of Educ., 313 F.3d 768, 780 n.7 (2d Cir. 2002).
    • (2002) Taylor v. Vt. Dep't of Educ.
  • 212
    • 84860311163 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 291 F.3d 1042, 1046-47 (8th Cir
    • Chalenor v. Univ. of N.D., 291 F.3d 1042, 1046-47 (8th Cir. 2002).
    • (2002) Chalenor v. Univ. of N.D.
  • 213
  • 215
    • 71849094131 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 533 U.S. 218, 246, Scalia, J. dissenting
    • United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218, 246 (2001) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
    • (2001) United States v. Mead Corp.
  • 216
    • 84860312486 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 368 F.3d 1118, 1120-21 (9th Cir.), aff'd
    • Oregon v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1118, 1120-21 (9th Cir. 2004), aff'd.
    • (2004) Oregon v. Ashcroft
  • 217
  • 220
    • 79952909646 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Administrative procedure and the decline of the trial
    • 473
    • Richard E. Levy & Sidney A. Shapiro, Administrative Procedure and the Decline of the Trial, 51 U. KAN. L. REV. 473, 496-97 (2003).
    • (2003) U. Kan. L. Rev. , vol.51 , pp. 496-497
    • Levy, R.E.1    Shapiro, S.A.2
  • 221
    • 71849094131 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 533 U.S. 218, 228, 238 n.19
    • United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218, 228, 238 n.19 (2001).
    • (2001) United States v. Mead Corp.
  • 224
    • 29144533156 scopus 로고
    • The legislative resolution of the rulemaking versus adjudication problem in agency lawmaking
    • 103
    • William T. Mayton, The Legislative Resolution of the Rulemaking Versus Adjudication Problem in Agency Lawmaking, 1980 DUKE L.J. 103, 103.
    • (1980) Duke L.J. , pp. 103
    • Mayton, W.T.1
  • 225
    • 0009389759 scopus 로고
    • Two problems in administrative law: Political polarity on the district of columbia circuit and judicial deterrence of agency rulemaking
    • 300
    • Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Two Problems in Administrative Law: Political Polarity on the District of Columbia Circuit and Judicial Deterrence of Agency Rulemaking, 1988 DUKE L.J. 300, 308-09.
    • (1988) Duke L.J. , pp. 308-309
    • Pierce Jr., R.J.1
  • 226
    • 0346845654 scopus 로고
    • The choice of rulemaking or adjudication in the development of administrative policy
    • 921
    • David L. Shapiro, The Choice of Rulemaking or Adjudication in the Development of Administrative Policy, 78 HARV. L. REV. 921, 929 (1965).
    • (1965) Harv. L. Rev. , vol.78 , pp. 929
    • Shapiro, D.L.1
  • 227
    • 26444597963 scopus 로고
    • The split-enforcement model: Some Conclusions from the OSHA and MSHA experiences
    • George Robert Johnson Jr., The Split-Enforcement Model: Some Conclusions from the OSHA and MSHA Experiences, 39 ADMIN. L. REV. 315 (1987).
    • (1987) Admin. L. Rev. , vol.39 , pp. 315
    • Johnson Jr., G.R.1
  • 229
    • 26444532800 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The allocation of authority under the mine act: Is the authority to decide questions of policy vested in the secretary of labor or in the review commission?
    • 1063
    • W. Christian Schumann, The Allocation of Authority Under the Mine Act: Is the Authority to Decide Questions of Policy Vested in the Secretary of Labor or in the Review Commission?, 98 W. VA. L. REV. 1063, 1065-66 (1996).
    • (1996) W. Va. L. Rev , vol.98 , pp. 1065-1066
    • Schumann, W.C.1
  • 231
    • 84860299058 scopus 로고
    • Enforcing aviation safety regulations: The case for a split-enforcement model of agency adjudication
    • 389
    • Richard H. Fallon, Jr., Enforcing Aviation Safety Regulations: The Case for a Split-Enforcement Model of Agency Adjudication, 4 ADMIN. L.J. AM. U. 389, 396-98 (1991).
    • (1991) Admin. L.J. Am. U. , vol.4 , pp. 396-398
    • Fallon Jr., R.H.1
  • 236
    • 76649132677 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Complementary constraints: Separation of powers, rational voting, and constitutional design
    • 617
    • Jide O. Nzelibe & Matthew C. Stephenson, Complementary Constraints: Separation of Powers, Rational Voting, and Constitutional Design, 123 HARV. L. REV. 617, 623-24 & n.7 (2010).
    • (2010) Harv. L. Rev. , vol.123 , Issue.7 , pp. 623-624
    • Nzelibe, J.O.1    Stephenson, M.C.2
  • 237
    • 0042028060 scopus 로고
    • Some normative arguments for the unitary executive
    • 23
    • Steven G. Calabresi, Some Normative Arguments for the Unitary Executive, 48 ARK. L. REV. 23, 67 (1995).
    • (1995) Ark. L. Rev. , vol.48 , pp. 67
    • Calabresi, S.G.1
  • 238
    • 0011647326 scopus 로고
    • The state of madison's vision of the state: A public choice perspective
    • 1328
    • Frank H. Easterbrook, The State of Madison's Vision of the State: A Public Choice Perspective, 107 HARV. L. REV. 1328, 1341-43 (1994).
    • (1994) Harv. L. Rev. , vol.107 , pp. 1341-1343
    • Easterbrook, F.H.1
  • 239
    • 76449115544 scopus 로고
    • 487 U.S. 654, 685-96
    • Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654, 685-96 (1988).
    • (1988) Morrison v. Olson
  • 241
    • 54249138129 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Optimal political control of the bureaucracy
    • 53
    • Matthew C. Stephenson, Optimal Political Control of the Bureaucracy, 107 MICH. L. REV. 53, 71-84 (2008).
    • (2008) Mich. L. Rev. , vol.107 , pp. 71-84
    • Stephenson, M.C.1
  • 242
    • 1842815194 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Legislating chevron
    • 2637
    • Elizabeth Garrett, Legislating Chevron, 101 MICH. L. REV. 2637, 2640 (2003).
    • (2003) Mich. L. Rev. , vol.101 , pp. 2640
    • Garrett, E.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.