Image registration and atlas-based segmentation of cardiac outflow velocity profiles

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 106, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 188-200

  Kalinić, Hrvoje ^a   Lončarić, Sven ^a   Čikeš, Maja ^b   Miličić, Davor ^b   Bijnens, Bart ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

^b KBC Zagreb   (Croatia)

^c UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Atlas based segmentation; Cardiac outflow velocity profile; Doppler ultrasound imaging; Image registration; Segmentation propagation

Indexed keywords

ATLAS-BASED SEGMENTATION; AUTOMATED SEGMENTATION; CARDIAC DISEASE; CARDIAC PARAMETERS; CARDIO-VASCULAR DISEASE; CONSISTENCY TESTS; DOPPLER ULTRASOUND; DOPPLER ULTRASOUND IMAGES; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATIONS; GRADIENT ASCENT; IMAGE SIMILARITY; IN-SILICO; INPUT IMAGE; INTRA-OBSERVER VARIABILITY; MULTI-RESOLUTIONS; NORMALIZED MUTUAL INFORMATION; OUTFLOW VELOCITIES; REGISTRATION METHODS; REGISTRATION PROCESS; SEGMENTATION EVALUATION; SEGMENTATION METHODS; SEGMENTATION PROPAGATION; SEGMENTATION RESULTS; SEGMENTED IMAGES; STATISTICAL IMAGES; ULTRASOUND IMAGE SEGMENTATION; ULTRASOUND IMAGES;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; HEART; IMAGE REGISTRATION; NON NEWTONIAN FLOW; ULTRASONIC IMAGING; ULTRASONICS;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

AORTA STENOSIS; ARTICLE; ATLAS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER MODEL; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; REGISTRATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; VELOCITY;

ALGORITHMS; AORTA; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIAC OUTPUT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84860250537     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: 18727565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Gaziano T.A. Cardiovascular disease in the developing world and its cost-effective management. Circulation 2005, 2005:3547-3553.
2. Association A.H. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics - 2008 Update 2008.
3. Cikes M., Kalinic H., Baltabaeva A., Loncaric S., Parsai C., Milicic D., Cikes I., Sutherland G., Bijnens B. The shape of the aortic outflow velocity profile revisited: is there a relation between its asymmetry and ventricular function in coronary artery disease?. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2009, 10(7):847-857.
4. Cikes M., Kalinic H., Hermann S., Lange V., Loncaric S., Milicic D., Beer M., Cikes I., Weidemann F., Bijnens B. Does the aortic velocity profile in aortic stenosis patients reflect more than stenosis severity? The impact of myocardial fibrosis on aortic flow symmetry. Eur. Heart J. 2009, 30(Suppl. 1):605-1605.
5. Doppler Ultrasound in Cardiology-Physical Principles and Clinical Applications 1982, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia. 2nd edition. L. Hatle, B. Angelsen (Eds.).
6. Doppler Myocardial Imaging-A Textbook 2006, BSWK, Hasselt, Belgium. 1st edition. G. Sutherland, L. Hatle, P. Claus, J. D'hooge, B. Bijnens (Eds.).
7. Bito V., Heinzel F.R., Weidemann F., Dommke C., van der Velden J., Verbeken E., Claus P., Bijnens B., De Scheerder I., Stienen G.J.M., Sutherland G.R., Sipido K.R. Cellular mechanisms of contractile dysfunction in hibernating myocardium. Circ. Res. 2004, 94(6):794-801.
8. Cikes M., Kalinic H., Baltabaeva A., Loncaric S., Parsai C., Hanzevacki J.S., Cikes I., Sutherland G., Bijnens B. Does symmetry of the aortic outflow velocity profile reflect contractile function in coronary artery disease?: an automated analysis using mathematical modeling. Circulation 2008, 177(19):196.
9. Handbook of Medical Imaging, vol. 2, Medical Image Processing and Analysis 2000, SPIE Press. M. Sonka, J.M. Fitzpatrick (Eds.).
10. Bushberg J.T., Seibert J.A., Leidholdt E.M.j., Boon J.M. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging 2002, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia. 2nd edition.
11. Tschirren J., Lauer R.M., Sonka M. Automated analysis of doppler ultrasound velocity flow diagrams. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2001, 20(12):1422-1425.
12. Bermejo J., Antoranz J.C., García-Fernández M.A., Moreno M.M., Delcán J.L. Flow dynamics of stenotic aortic valves assessed by signal processing of doppler spectrograms. Am. J. Cardiol. 2000, 611-617.
13. Zitova B., Flusser J. Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vis. Comput. 2003, 21(11):977-1000.
14. Lee S., Fichtinger G., Chirikjian G.S. Novel algorithms for robust registration of fiducials in ct and mri. MICCAI'01: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 2001, 717-724. Springer-Verlag, London, UK.
15. Betke M., Hong H., Ko J.P. Automatic 3d registration of lung surfaces in computed tomography scans. MICCAI'01: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 2001, 725-733. Springer-Verlag, London, UK.
16. Subsol G. Crest lines for curved-based warping. Brain Warping 1999, Academic Press.
17. Thompson P., Toga A.W. A surface-based technique for warping three-dimensional images of the brain. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 1996, 15(4):402-417.
18. Maintz J., Viergever M. A survey of medical image registration. Med. Image Anal. 1998, 2(1):1-36.
19. Mäkelä T., Clarysse P., Sipilä O., Pauna N., Pham Q.-C., Katila T., Magnin I.E. A review of cardiac image registration methods. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2002, 21(9):1011-1021.
20. Medical Image Registration 2001, CRC Press, Cambridge. 1st edition. J.V. Hajnal, L.G. Hill, D.J. Hawkes (Eds.).
21. Maes F., Collignon A., Vandermeulen D., Marchal G., Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 1997, 16:187-198.
22. Dawant B.M., Zijdenbos A.P. Image registration. Handbook of Medical Imaging, vol. 2, Medical Image Processing and Analysis 2000, SPIE Press, pp. 71-128.
23. Kalinić H., Lončarić S., Čikeš M., Baltabaeva A., Parsai C., Šeparović J., Čikeš I., Sutherland G.R., Bijenens B. Analysis of doppler ultrasound outflow profiles for the detection of changes in cardiac function. Proceedings of the Fifth Int'l Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis 2007, 326-331.
24. Kalinić H., Lončarić S., Čikeš M., Miličić D., Čikeš I., Sutherland G., Bijnens B. A method for registration and model-based segmentation of doppler ultrasound images, Medical Imaging 2009. Image Processing 2009, 7259(1):72590. http://link.aip.org/link/?PSI/7259/72590S/1.
25. Frangi A.F., Rueckert D., Schnabel J.A., Niessen W.J. Automatic construction of multiple-object three-dimensional statistical shape models: application to cardiac modeling. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2002, 21(9):1151-1166.
26. Perperidis D., Mohiaddin R., Rueckert D. Construction of a 4d statistical atlas of the cardiac anatomy and its use in classification. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 2005, 8(Pt 2):402-410.
27. Lorenzo-Valdés M., Sanchez-Ortiz G.I., Mohiaddin R., Rueckert D. Atlas-based segmentation and tracking of 3d cardiac mr images using non-rigid registration. MICCAI 2002, 1:642-650.
28. Fillard P., Pennec X., Thompson P.M., Ayache N. Evaluating brain anatomical correlations via canonical correlation analysis of sulcal lines. Proc. of MICCAI'07 Workshop on Statistical Registration: Pair-wise and Group-wise Alignment and Atlas Formation 2007.
29. Joshi S., Davis B., Jomier M., Gerig G. Unbiased diffeomorphic atlas construction for computational anatomy. Neuroimage 2004, 23(Suppl. 1):S151-S160.
30. Bhatia K.K., Hajnal J.V., Puri B.K., Edwards A.D., Rueckert D. Consistent groupwise non-rigid registration for atlas construction. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Biomedical Imaging ISBI 2004, 908-911.
31. Lorenzen P., Davis B., Gerig G., Bullitt E., Joshi S. Multi-class posterior atlas formation via unbiased kullback-leibler template estimation. In LNCS 2004, 95-102.
32. Lorenzen P., Prastawa M., Davis B., Gerig G., Bullitt E., Joshi S. Multi-modal image set registration and atlas formation. Med. Image Anal. 2006, 10(3):440-451.
33. Bach Cuadra M., Pollo C., Bardera A., Cuisenaire O., Villemure J., Thiran J. Atlas-based segmentation of pathological brain mr images. Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing 2003, ICIP'03 2003, 14-17.
34. Rueckert D., Frangi A.F., Schnabel J.A. Automatic construction of 3-d statistical deformation models of the brain using nonrigid registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2003, 228:1014-1025.
35. Essen D.C.V., Drury H.A. Structural and functional analyses of human cerebral cortex using a surface-based atlas. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17(18):7079-7102.
36. Studholme C., Cardenas V. A template free approach to volumetric spatial normalization of brain anatomy. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2004, 25(10):1191-1202.
37. Toga A.W., Thompson P.M. The role of image registration in brain mapping. Image Vis. Comput. 2001, 19(1-2):3-24.
38. Christensen G.E., Johnson H.J., Vannier M.W. Synthesizing average 3d anatomical shapes. Neuroimage 2006, 146-158.
39. Fitzpatrick J.M., Hill D.L.G., Maurer C.R.J. Image registration. Handbook of Medical Imaging, vol. 2, Medical Image Processing and Analysis 2000, SPIE Press, pp. 447-514.
40. Roche A., Malandain G., Ayache N., Prima S. Towards a better comprehension of similarity measures used in medical image registration. MICCAI 1999, 555-566.
41. Practical Methods of Optimization 2001, John Wiley and Sons. 2nd edition. R. Fletcher (Ed.).
42. Pluim J.P.W., Maintz J.B.A., Viergever M.A. Interpolation artefacts in mutual information-based image registration. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 2000, 77(9):211-232.
43. Christensen G., Johnson H. Consistent image registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2001, 568-582.
44. Johnson H., Christensen G., Johnson H.J., Christensen G.E. Consistent landmark and intensity based image registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2002, 21(5):450-461.