A clinical method to assess the effect of visual loss on the ability to perform activities of daily living

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 96, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 735-741

  Wei, Hong ^a   Sawchyn, Andrea K ^b   Myers, Jonathan S ^b   Katz, L Jay ^b   Moster, Marlene R ^b   Wizov, Sheryl S ^b   Steele, Marianne ^b   Lo, David ^b   Spaeth, George L ^b  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE VISUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLOR PERCEPTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; VISION, LOW; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUALLY IMPAIRED PERSONS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84860215102     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300093     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Spaeth G, Walt J, Keener J. Evaluation of quality of life for patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141(1 Suppl):S3-14.
2. Warrian KJ, Altangerel U, Spaeth GL. Performance-based measures of visual function. Surv Ophthalmol 2010;55:146-61.
3. Colenbrander A. Assessment of functional vision and its rehabilitation. Acta Ophthalmol 2010;88:163-73.
4. Giaschi DE, Trope GE, Kothe AC, et al. Loss of sensitivity to motion-defined form in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1996;13:707-15.
5. Fujita K, Yasuda N, Oda K, et al. Reading performance in patients with central visual field disturbance due to glaucoma. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2006;110:914-18.
6. Altangerel U, Spaeth GL, Steinmann WC. Assessment of function related to vision (AFREV). Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2006;13:67-80. (Pubitemid 43336340)
7. Seeman TE, Charpentier PA, Berkman LF, et al. Predicting changes in physical performance in a high-functioning elderly cohort: MacArthur studies of successful aging. J Gerontol 1994;49:M97-108.
8. Owen VM, Crabb DP, White ET, et al. Glaucoma and fitness to drive: using binocular visual fields to predict a milestone to blindness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:2449-55.
9. Haymes SA, Leblanc RP, Nicolela MT, et al. Glaucoma and on-road driving performance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:3035-41.
10. Ramulu P. Glaucoma and disability: which tasks are affected, and at what stage of disease? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2009;20:92-8.
11. Ramulu PY, West SK, Munoz B, et al. Glaucoma and reading speed: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation project. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:82-7.
12. Haymes SA, Johnston AW, Heyes AD. Relationship between vision impairment and ability to perform activities of daily living. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002;22:79-91. (Pubitemid 41709888)
13. Wittink H, Rogers W, Sukiennik A, et al. Physical functioning: self-report and performance measures are related but distinct. Spine 2003;28:2407-13. (Pubitemid 37271341)
14. Haymes SA, Leblanc RP, Nicolela MT, et al. Risk of falls and motor vehicle collisions in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:1149-55. (Pubitemid 351261409)
15. Kotecha A, O'Leary N, Melmoth D, et al. The functional consequences of glaucoma for eye-hand coordination. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:203-13.
16. Altangerel U, Spaeth GL, Rhee DJ. Visual function, disability, and psychological impact of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2003;14:100-5. (Pubitemid 36584230)
17. Chauhan BC. Detection of glaucoma: the role of new functional and structural tests. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004;15:93-5. (Pubitemid 38457126)
18. Lorenzana L, Lankaranian D, Dugar J, et al. A new method of assessing ability to perform activities of daily living: design, methods and baseline data. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2009;16:107-14.
19. Marella M, Pesudovs K, Keeffe JE, et al. The psychometric validity of the NEI VFQ- 25 for use in a low-vision population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51: 2878-84.
20. Owen CG, Rudnicka AR, Smeeth L, et al. Is the NEI-VFQ-25 a useful tool in identifying visual impairment in an elderly population? BMC Ophthalmol 2006;6:24.
21. Vandenbroeck S, De Geest S, Zeyen T, et al. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) in glaucoma: a systematic review. Eye 2011;25:555-77.
22. West SK, Rubin GS, Broman AT, et al. How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE Project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:774-80. (Pubitemid 34620357)
23. Owsley C, McGwin G Jr. Vision and driving. Vision Res 2011;50:2348-61.
24. Konstantopoulos P, Chapman P, Crundall D. Driver's visual attention as a function of driving experience and visibility. Using a driving simulator to explore drivers' eye movements in day, night and rain driving. Accid Anal Prev 2011;42:827-34.
25. Warrian KJ, Lorenzana LL, Lankaranian D, et al. Assessing age-related macular degeneration with the ADREV performance-based measure. Retina 2009;29: 80-90.
26. Warrian KJ, Lorenzana LL, Lankaranian D, et al. The assessment of disability related to vision performance-based measure in diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:852-60.e1.
27. Richman J, Lorenzana LL, Lankaranian D, et al. Relationships in glaucoma patients between standard vision tests, quality of life, and ability to perform daily activities. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2010;17:144-51.
28. Hodapp E, Parrish RK, Anderson DR. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc, 1993.
29. Bayer A, Harasymowycz P, Henderer JD, et al. Validity of a new disk grading scale for estimating glaucomatous damage: correlation with visual field damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:758-63. (Pubitemid 34580622)
30. Spaeth GL, Henderer J, Liu C, et al. The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2002;100:181-5.
31. Henderer JD, Liu C, Kesen M, et al. Reliability of the disk damage likelihood scale. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:44-8. (Pubitemid 36020423)
32. Parrish RK II. Visual impairment, visual functioning, and quality of life assessments in patients with glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1996;94:919-1028.