Assessing age-related macular degeneration with the adrev performance-based measure

Retina

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 80-90

  Warrian, Kevin J ^a,c   Lorenzana, Luciano L ^a   Lankaranian, Dara ^a   Dugar, Jyoti ^a   Wizov, Sheryl S ^a   Spaeth, George L ^a,b  

^a Wills Eye Institute   (United States)

^b THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ST JOSEPH S HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BOOTSTRAPPING; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMORBIDITY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EXUDATE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERFORMANCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETINA MACULA AGE RELATED DEGENERATION; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; DISABILITY; PATIENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETINA MACULA DEGENERATION; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MACULAR DEGENERATION; MALE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUALLY IMPAIRED PERSONS;

EID: 61549116527     PISSN: 0275004X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318187f160     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. McKnight C. Medicine as an essentially contested concept. J Med Ethics 2003;29:261-262.
2. Owsley C, McGwin G Jr. Depression and the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire in older adults. Ophthalmology 2004;111:2259-2264.
3. Yamaoka K, Shigehisa T, Ogoshi K, et al. Health-related quality of life varies with personality types: a comparison among cancer patients, non-cancer patients and healthy individuals in a Japanese population. Qual Life Res 1998;7:535- 544.
4. Kempen GI, Jelicic M, Ormel J. Personality, chronic medical morbidity, and health-related quality of life among older persons. Health Psychol 1997;16:539 -546.
5. Feldman PJ, Cohen S, Doyle WJ, Skoner DP, Gwaltney JMJ. The impact of personality on the reporting of unfounded symptoms and illness. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999;77:370 -378.
6. Ebert EM, Fine AM, Markowitz J, Maguire MG, Starr JS, Fine SL. Functional vision in patients with neovascular maculopa-thy and poor visual acuity. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:1009- 1012.
7. Alexander MF, Maguire MG, Lietman TM, Snyder JR, Elman MJ, Fine SL. Assessment of visual function in patients with age-related macular degeneration and low visual acuity. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:1543-1547.
8. Haymes SA, Johnston AW, Heyes AD. Preliminary investigation of the responsiveness of the Melbourne Low Vision ADL index to low-vision rehabilitation. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78: 373-380.
9. Friedman SM, Munoz B, Rubin GS, West SK, Bandeen-Roche K, Fried LP. Characteristics of discrepancies between self-reported visual function and measured reading speed. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project Team. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:858-864.
10. Chylack LT Jr, Leske MC, McCarthy D, Khu P, Kashiwagi T, Sperduto R. Lens opacities classification system II (LOCS II). Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:991-997.
11. Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1976;53:740-745.
12. Altangerel U, Spaeth GL, Steinmann WC. Assessment of function related to vision (AFREV). Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2006;13:67-80.
13. Owsley C, McGwin G Jr, Sloane ME, Stalvey BT, Wells J. Timed instrumental activities of daily living tasks: relationship to visual function in older adults. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:350 -359.
14. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Pitts J, Gutierrez P, Berry S, Hays RD. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). NEI-VFQ Field Test Investigators. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1496-1504.
15. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spritzer K, Berry S, Hays RD. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119: 1050-1058.
16. Clemons TE, Chew EY, Bressler SB, McBee W. National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS): AREDS Report No. 10. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:211-217.
17. Lindblad AS, Clemons TE. Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire to progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration, vision loss, and lens opacity: AREDS Report no. 14. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123:1207-1214.
18. Cahill MT, Banks AD, Stinnett SS, Toth CA. Vision-related quality of life in patients with bilateral severe age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2005;112:152-158.
19. Glantz SA. Primer of Biostatistics. 5th ed. Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill; 2002.
20. Massof RW, Fletcher DC. Evaluation of the NEI visual functioning questionnaire as an interval measure of visual ability in low vision. Vision Res 2001;41:397-413.
21. Huber PJ. Robust Statistics. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
22. Rousseeuw PJ, Leroy AM. Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1987.
23. Huber M, Rousseeuw PJ. Robust regression with both continuous and binary regressors. J Stat Plan Inference 1997;57:153-163.
24. Harlow LL. The Essence of Multivariate Thinking. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005.
25. Marascuilo LA, Levin JR. Multivariate Statistics in the Social Sciences: A Research Guide. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company; 1983.
26. Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 1979;7:1-26.
27. Shorack GR. Bootstrapping robust regression. Commun Stat Theory Methods 1982;11:961-972.
28. Thompson B. The use of statistical significance tests in research: bootstrap and other alternatives. J Exp Educ 1993;61: 361-377.
29. Davison AC, Hinkley DV. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
30. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bon-ferroni method. BMJ 1995;310:170.
31. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39:175-191.
32. Risk factors associated with age-related macular degeneration. A case-control study in the age-related eye disease study: age-related eye disease study report number 3. Ophthalmology 2000;107:2224-2232.
33. Clemons TE, Milton RC, Klein R, Seddon JM, Ferris FL III. Risk factors for the incidence of Advanced Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) AREDS report no. 19. Ophthalmology 2005;112:533-539.
34. Kleiner RC, Enger C, Alexander MF, Fine SL. Contrast sensitivity in age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:55-57.
35. Stangos N, Voutas S, Topouzis F, Karampatakis V. Contrast sensitivity evaluation in eyes predisposed to age-related mac-ular degeneration and presenting normal visual acuity. Oph-thalmologica 1995;209:194-198.
36. Bansback N, Czoski-Murray C, Carlton J, et al. Determinants of health related quality of life and health state utility in patients with age related macular degeneration: the association of contrast sensitivity and visual acuity. Qual Life Res 2007; 16:533-543.