The Assessment of Disability Related to Vision Performance-Based Measure in Diabetic Retinopathy

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 149, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Warrian, Kevin J ^a   Lorenzana, Luciano L ^a   Lankaranian, Dara ^a   Dugar, Jyoti ^a   Wizov, Sheryl S ^a   Spaeth, George L ^a  

^a WILLS EYE HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOOTSTRAPPING; COLOR VISION; COMORBIDITY; DEPENDENT PERSONALITY DISORDER; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DRIVING ABILITY; DYSLEXIA; EYE EXAMINATION; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; HYPERTENSION; HYPERTHYROIDISM; HYPOTHYROIDISM; INSTRUMENTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MOBILIZATION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; OBJECT RELATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PERIPHERAL VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; READING; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL STATUS; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 77950843541     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.12.028     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Yamaoka K., Shigehisa T., Ogoshi K., et al. Health-related quality of life varies with personality types: a comparison among cancer patients, non-cancer patients and healthy individuals in a Japanese population. Qual Life Res 7 (1998) 535-544
2. Kempen G.I.J.M., Jelicic M., and Ormel J. Personality, chronic medical comorbidity, and health-related quality of life among older persons. Health Psychol 16 (1997) 539-546
3. Owsley C., and McGwin Jr. G. Depression and the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire in older adults. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 2259-2264
4. Feldman P.J., Cohen S., Doyle W.J., Skoner D.P., and Gwaltney J.M.J. The impact of personality on the reporting of unfounded symptoms and illness. J Pers Soc Psychol 77 (1999) 370-378
5. Deary I.J., Scott S., and Wilson J.A. Neuroticism, alexithymia, and medically unexplained symptoms. Pers Individ Dif 22 (1997) 551-564
6. Massof R.W., and Fletcher D.C. Evaluation of the NEI visual functioning questionnaire as an interval measure of visual ability in low vision. Vision Res 41 (2001) 397-413
7. Ebert E.M., Fine A.M., Markowitz J., Maguire M.G., Starr J.S., and Fine S.L. Functional vision in patients with neovascular maculopathy and poor visual acuity. Arch Ophthalmol 104 (1986) 1009-1012
8. Turco P.D., Connolly J., McCabe P., and Glynn R.J. Assessment of functional vision performance: a new test for low vision patients. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1 (1994) 15-25
9. West S.K., Munoz B., Rubin G.S., et al. Function and visual impairment in a population-based study of older adults. The SEE project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38 (1997) 72-82
10. McCabe P., Nason F., Demers Turco P., Friedman D., and Seddon J.M. Evaluating the effectiveness of a vision rehabilitation intervention using an objective and subjective measure of functional performance. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 7 (2000) 259-270
11. Haymes S.A., Johnston A.W., and Heyes A.D. Preliminary investigation of the responsiveness of the Melbourne Low Vision ADL index to low-vision rehabilitation. Optom Vis Sci 78 (2001) 373-380
12. Chylack Jr. L.T., Leske M.C., McCarthy D., Khu P., Kashiwagi T., and Sperduto R. Lens opacities classification system II (LOCS II). Arch Ophthalmol 107 (1989) 991-997
13. The Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial Research Group. Optic nerve decompression surgery for nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) is not effective and may be harmful. JAMA 273 (1995) 625-632
14. Altangerel U., Spaeth G.L., and Steinmann W.C. Assessment of function related to vision (AFREV). Ophthalmic Epidemiol 13 (2006) 67-80
15. Lorenzana L., Lankaranian D., Dugar J., et al. A new method of assessing ability to perform activities of daily living: design, methods and baseline data. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 16 (2009) 107-114
16. Warrian K.J., Lorenzana L.L., Lankaranian D., Dugar J., Wizov S.S., and Spaeth G.L. Assessing age-related macular degeneration with the ADREV performance-based measure. Retina 29 (2009) 80-90
17. Mangione C.M., Berry S., Spritzer K., et al. Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Arch Ophthalmol 116 (1998) 227-233
18. Mangione C.M., Lee P.P., Pitts J., Gutierrez P., Berry S., and Hays R.D. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). NEI-VFQ Field Test Investigators. Arch Ophthalmol 116 (1998) 1496-1504
19. Mangione C.M., Lee P.P., Gutierrez P.R., Spritzer K., Berry S., and Hays R.D. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol 119 (2001) 1050-1058
20. Klein R., Moss S.E., Klein B.E., Gutierrez P., and Mangione C.M. The NEI-VFQ-25 in people with long-term type 1 diabetes mellitus: the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 119 (2001) 733-740
21. Tranos P.G., Topouzis F., Stangos N.T., et al. Effect of laser photocoagulation treatment for diabetic macular oedema on patient's vision-related quality of life. Curr Eye Res 29 (2004) 41-49
22. Cusick M., SanGiovanni J.P., Chew E.Y., et al. Central visual function and the NEI-VFQ-25 near and distance activities subscale scores in people with type 1 and 2 diabetes. Am J Ophthalmol 139 (2005) 1042-1050
23. Glantz S.A. Primer of Biostatistics. 5th ed. (2002), McGraw-Hill, Chicago, IL
24. Huber P.J. Robust Statistics (1981), John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY
25. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
26. Rousseeuw P.J., and Leroy A.M. Robust Regression and Outlier Detection (1987), John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY
27. Huber M., and Rousseeuw P.J. Robust regression with both continuous and binary regressors. J Stat Plan Inference 57 (1997) 153-163
28. Harlow L.L. The essence of multivariate thinking (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
29. Marascuilo L.A., and Levin J.R. Multivariate statistics in the social sciences: A research guide (1983), Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Monterey, CA
30. Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7 (1979) 1-26
31. Shorack G.R. Bootstrapping robust regression. Commun Stat Theory Methods 11 (1982) 961-972
32. Thompson B. The use of statistical significance tests in research: Bootstrap and other alternatives. J Exp Educ 61 (1993) 361-377
33. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 310 (1995) 170
34. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A.G., and Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Meth 39 (2007) 175-191
35. Paz S.H., Globe D.R., Wu J., Azen S.P., and Varma R. Relationship between self-reported depression and self-reported visual function in Latinos. Arch Ophthalmol 121 (2003) 1021-1027
36. Haymes S.A., Johnston A.W., and Heyes A.D. A weighted version of the Melbourne Low-Vision ADL Index: a measure of disability impact. Optom Vis Sci 78 (2001) 565-579
37. Wall M., and Jennisch C.S. Random dot motion stimuli are more sensitive than light stimuli for detection of visual field loss in ocular hypertension patients. Optom Vis Sci 76 (1999) 550-557