Sexual judgments: Full faith and credit and the relational character of legal sex

Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 51-80

  Cruz, David B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860185323     PISSN: 00178039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Paisley Currah, Richard M. Juang & Shannon Price Minter, Introduction, in TRANSGENDER RIGHTS xiii, xiv (Paisley Currah, Richard M. Juang & Shannon Price Minter eds., 2006).
2. Alice Domurat Dreger, A History of Intersex: From the Age of Gonads to the Age of Consent, in INTERSEX IN THE AGE OF ETHICS 5-6 (Alice Domurat Dreger ed., 1999)).
3. Hartin v. Dir. of Bureau of Records, 347 N.Y.S.2d 515 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1973) (birth certificate).
4. Anonymous v. Anonymous, 325 N.Y.S.2d 499 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1971) (marriage).
5. Anonymous v. Weiner, 270 N.Y.S.2d 319 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1965) (birth certificate).
6. M.T. v. J.T., 355 A.2d 204 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1976).
7. Littleton v. Prange, 9 S.W.3d 223 (Tex. App. 1999).
8. Kantaras v. Kantaras, 884 So. 2d 155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004).
9. Littleton v. Prange, 9 S.W.3d 223, 225, 231 (Tex. App. 1999).
10. Gay Marriage Timeline, PEW FORUM ON RELIGION & PUBLIC LIFE (Apr. 1, 2008), http://pewforum.org/Gay-Marriage-and-Homosexuality/Gay-Marriage-Timeline. aspx.
11. Kantaras v. Kantaras, 884 So. 2d 155, 155-56, 161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004).
12. Dean Spade, Be Professional!, 33 HARV. J.L. & GENDER 71, 76 n.6 (2010).
13. Julia Serano, Whipping Girl FAQ on cissexual, cisgender, and cis privilege, http://juliaserano.livejournal.com/14700.html (May 14, 2009, 05:46 EST))).
14. Katherine A. Womack, Please Check One-Male or Female?: Confronting Gender Identity Discrimination in Collegiate Residential Life, 44 U. RICH. L. REV. 1365, 1371 (2010).
15. John Parsi, Note, The (Mis)Categorization of Sex in Anglo-American Cases of Transsexual Marriage, 108 MICH. L. REV. 1497, 1521 (2010).
16. Cathy Perifimos, Note, The Changing Faces of Women's Colleges: Striking a Balance Between Transgender Rights and Women's Colleges' Right to Exclude, 15 CARDOZO J.L. & GENDER 141, 163 (2008).
17. Julie A. Greenberg & Marybeth Herald, You Can't Take It With You: Constitutional Consequences of Interstate Gender-Identity Rulings, 80 WASH. L. REV. 819, 855-56 (2005).
18. Shana Brown, Sex Changes and "Opposite-Sex" Marriage: Applying the Full Faith and Credit Clause to Compel Interstate Recognition of Transgendered Persons' Amended Legal Sex for Marital Purposes, 38 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 1113, 1154 (2001).
19. Jackson, Full Faith and Credit-The Lawyer's Clause of the Constitution, 45 COLUM. L. REV. 1 (1945).
20. Baker v. General Motors Corp., 522 U.S. 222, 231 n.3 (1998).
21. Shawn Gebhardt, Comment, Full Faith and Credit for Status Records: A Reconsideration of Gardiner, 97 CALIF. L. REV. 1419, 1421, 1426 (2009).
22. Stewart E. Sterk, The Muddy Boundaries Between Res Judicata and Full Faith and Credit, 58 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 47, 57 n.32 (2001).
23. Riley v. New York Trust Co., 315 U.S. 343, 349 (1942).
24. Baker v. Gen. Motors Corp., 522 U.S. 222, 233 (1998).
25. Broderick v. Rosner, 294 U.S. 629, 642 (1935).
26. David E. Engdahl, The Classic Rule of Faith and Credit, 118 YALE L.J. 1584 (2009).
27. Stephen E. Sachs, Full Faith and Credit in the Early Congress, 95 VA. L. REV. 1201 (2009) (same).
28. Patrick J. Borchers, Baker v. General Motors: Implications for Interjurisdictional Recognition of Non-Traditional Marriages, 32 CREIGHTON L. REV. 147, 159-60 (1998).
29. Ralph U. Whitten, The Constitutional Limitations on State-Court Jurisdiction: A Historical Interpretative Reexamination of the Full Faith and Credit and Due Process Clauses (Part One), 14 CREIGHTON L. REV. 499 (1981).
30. Douglas Laycock, Equal Citizens of Equal and Territorial States: The Constitutional Foundations of Choice of Law, 92 COLUM. L. REV. 249, 290 (1992).
31. Carlos Manuel Vázquez, Night and Day: Coeur d'Alene, Breard, and the Unraveling of the Prospective-Retrospective Distinction in Eleventh Amendment Doctrine, 87 GEO. L.J. 1 (1998). (Pubitemid 128426743)
32. Lawrence B. Solum, Procedural Justice, 78 S. CAL. L. REV. 181, 192 (2004).
33. Rena M. Lindevaldsen, Same-Sex Relationships and the Full Faith and Credit Clause: Reducing America to the Lowest Common Denominator, 16 WM. & MARY J. WOMEN & L. 29, 54 (2009).
34. JOURNALS OF THE CONTINENTAL CONGRESS 1774-1789, at 887 (1907)).
35. Lea Brilmayer, Credit Due Judgments and Credit Due Laws: The Respective Roles of Due Process and Full Faith and Credit in the Interstate Context, 70 IOWA L. REV. 95, 100 (1984).
36. Baker v. Gen. Motors Corp., 522 U.S. 222, 232 (1998).
37. Pac. Emps. Ins. Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'n, 306 U.S. 493, 501 (1939)).
38. EDWARD STEIN, FORMS OF DESIRE: SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVIST CONTROVERSY (1990).
39. Janet E. Halley, Sexual Orientation and the Politics of Biology: A Critique of the Argument from Immutability, 46 STAN. L. REV. 503 (1994). (Pubitemid 127058412)
40. Angela P. Harris, Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory, 42 STAN. L. REV. 581 (1990).
41. MARTHA MINOW, MAKING ALL THE DIFFERENCE: INCLUSION, EXCLUSION, AND AMERICAN LAW 12-13, 50-51, 53-55, 80, 377 (1990).
42. David B. Cruz, Getting Sex "Right": Heteronormativity and Biologism in Trans and Intersex Marriage Litigation and Scholarship, 18 DUKE J. GENDER L. & POL'Y (forthcoming Fall 2010).
43. David B. Cruz, Disestablishing Sex and Gender, 90 CALIF. L. REV. 997 (2002).
44. Lokemun Magar, A guide to Chinese birthday customs, HELIUM, http://www.helium.com/items/718358-guide-to-chinese-birthday-customs (last visited Feb. 28, 2010).
45. Social interpretations of race, WIKIPEDIA (Nov. 5, 2010), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social-interpretations-of-race.
46. Saint Francis Coll. v. Al-Khazraji, 481 U.S. 604, 610 (1987).
47. David B. Cruz, Address to the California Judges Association: Recent Decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court (Sept. 30, 2007).
48. Parents Involved in Cmty. Schs. v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007)).
49. Michael M. v. Superior Court of California, 450 U.S. 464 (1981).
50. K. v. Health Div., Dep't of Human Res., 560 P.2d 1070, 1072 (Or. 1977).
51. Julie A. Greenberg, Defining Male and Female: Intersexuality and the Collision Between Law and Biology, 41 ARIZ. L. REV. 265, 278 n.74 (1999).
52. Suzanne J. Kessler, LESSONS FROM THE INTERSEXED (1998).
53. Parents Involved in Cmty. Schs. v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1, 551 U.S. 701, 750 n.3 (2007).
54. Kimberly A. Yuracko, Private Nurses and Playboy Bunnies: Explaining Permissible Sex Discrimination, 92 CALIF. L. REV. 147, 151-52 (2004).
55. Dean Spade, Address at the UCLA School of Law Williams Institute 6th Annual Update on Sexual Orientation Law and Public Policy: Trans Sensitivity in the Legal Profession (Feb. 23, 2007).
56. Littleton v. Prange, 9 S.W.3d 223, 231 (Tex. App. 1999).
57. Julie A. Greenberg, When Is a Same-Sex Marriage Legal? Full Faith and Credit and Sex Determination, 38 CREIGHTON L. REV. 289, 306 (2005).
58. Rosengarten v. Downes, 802 A.2d 170, 178 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002).
59. Patrick J. Borchers, The Essential Irrelevance of the Full Faith and Credit Clause to the Same-Sex Marriage Debate, 38 CREIGHTON L. REV. 353, 360 (2005)).
60. Neely v. Club Med Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 63 F.3d 166, 177 (3d Cir. 1995).
61. RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW § 401(a) (1987)).
62. Lea Brilmayer, Jennifer Haverkamp & Buck Logan, A General Look at General Jurisdiction, 66 TEX. L. REV. 721, 772 (1998).
63. Willis L. M. Reese, Legislative Jurisdiction, 78 COLUM. L. REV. 1587 (1978).
64. A. Benjamin Spencer, Jurisdiction to Adjudicate: A Revised Analysis, 73 U. CHI. L. REV. 617 (2006).
65. Williams v. North Carolina (Williams II), 325 U.S. 226, 227-28 (1945).
66. Hood v. McGehee, 237 U.S. 611 (1915).
67. RESTATEMENT (FIRST) OF CONFLICT OF LAWS § 119 cmt. c (1934)).
68. Yarborough v. Yarborough, 290 U.S. 202, 210 (1933)).
69. Williams v. North Carolina (Williams I), 317 U.S. 287 (1942).
70. Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706, 762-63, n.2, 814 (1999).
71. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44, 166 (1996) (Souter, J., dissenting) (same).
72. Christopher L. Eisgruber, The Fourteenth Amendment's Constitution, 69 S. CAL. L. REV. 47, 87 (1995).
73. Glanding v. Indus. Trust Co., 45 A.2d 553, 555 (Del. 1945).
74. Adar v. Smith, 597 F.3d 697, 707 (5th Cir. 2010).
75. Mills v. Duryee, 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 481, 485 (1813).
76. Williams v. North Carolina (Williams II), 325 U.S. 226, 229-30 (1945).
77. U.S. GOV'T ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE, GAO-04-353R, DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT: UPDATE TO PRIOR REPORT 1 (2004), available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/ d04353r.pdf.
78. Adar v. Smith, 597 F.3d 697, 708 (5th Cir. 2010).
79. Finstuen v. Crutcher, 496 F.3d 1139, 1154 (10th Cir. 2007).
80. Adar v. Smith, 597 F.3d 697 (5th Cir. 2010).
81. Johnson v. Transp. Agency, 480 U.S. 616 (1987) (Title VII challenge by male to application of such a plan).
82. RESTATEMENT (FIRST) OF CONFLICT OF LAWS § 119 cmt. d (1934)).
83. RESTATEMENT (FIRST) OF CONFLICT OF LAWS § 119 cmt. a (1934)).
84. JAY PROSSER, SECOND SKINS: THE BODY NARRATIVES OF TRANSSEXUALITY (1998).
85. Ronald Garet, Self- Transformability, 65 S. CAL. L. REV. 121 (1991).
86. Norman W. Spaulding, Constitution as Countermonument: Federalism, Reconstruction, and the Problem of Collective Memory, 203 COLUM. L. REV. 1992 (2003).