A new blended learning concept for medical students in otolaryngology

Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 138, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 358-366

  Grasl, Matthaeus C ^a   Pokieser, Peter ^a   Gleiss, Andreas ^a   Brandstaetter, Juergen ^a   Sigmund, Thorsten ^a   Erovic, Boban M ^a,b   Fischer, Martin R ^c  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONCEPT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERVENTION STUDY; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST; NORMAL HUMAN; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STUDENT SATISFACTION; STUDY DESIGN; TEACHING; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; WEB BROWSER;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUSTRIA; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; OTOLARYNGOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84860173199     PISSN: 08864470     EISSN: 1538361X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2012.145     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ellaway R, Masters K. AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education part 1: learning, teaching and assessment. Med Teach. 2008;30(5):455-473. (Pubitemid 351983065)
2. Fischer MRG. e-Learning in the medical education, further and continuing education. Med Klin (Munich). 2003;98(10):594-597. (Pubitemid 37328315)
3. Rajapakse S, Fernando D, Rubasinghe N, Gurusinghe S. e-Learning in medical education: guide supplement 32.6 - practical application. Med Teach. 2009; 31(5):452-453.
4. Harden RM. E-learning-caged bird or soaring eagle? Med Teach. 2008;30(1):1-4.
5. Karsten G, Kopp V, Brüchner K, Fischer MR. A blended learning approach for the integrated and standardized teaching of clinical skills: the CliSO project. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2009;26(1):Doc10.
6. Bridges SM, Botelho MG, Tsang PCS. PBL.2.0: blended learning for an interactive, problem-based pedagogy. Med Educ. 2010;44(11):1131.
7. Cook DA, Garside S, Levinson AJ, Dupras DM, Montori VM. What do we mean by web-based learning? a systematic review of the variability of interventions. Med Educ. 2010;44(8):765-774.
8. Cook DA. The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it. Med Teach. 2009;31(2):158-162.
9. Pokieser P, Brandstätter J, Moritz T, Domanovits H, Sodeck G, Fischer MR. Unified Patient Project - field report on web-based case studies in the clinical education. Zeitschrift für E-Learning. 2009;1:49-59.
10. Burke J, Fayaz S, Graham K, Matthew R, Field M. Peer-assisted learning in the acquisition of clinical skills: a supplementary approach to musculoskeletal system training. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):577-582. (Pubitemid 350056034)
11. Durning SJ, ten Cate OT. Peer teaching in medical education. Med Teach. 2007; 29(6):523-524. (Pubitemid 350056026)
12. Ten Cate O, Durning S. Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):591-599. (Pubitemid 350056036)
13. Haddad J Jr, Shah J, Takoudes TG. A survey of US medical education in otolaryngology. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(11):1166-1169. (Pubitemid 37433151)
14. Mohyuddin N, Langerman A, LeHew Ch, Kaste L, Pytynia K. Knowledge of head and neck cancer among medical students at 2 Chicago universities. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(12):1294-1298.
15. Sandars J, Lafferty N. Twelve tips on usability testing to develop effective e-learning in medical education. Med Teach. 2010;32(12):956-960.
16. Prince NJ, Cass HD, Klaber RE. Accessing e-learning and e-resources. Med Educ. 2010;44(5):436-437.
17. Langedijk A, Käser L, Lüthi T. Use of the Internet and computer as well as elearning experiences of medical students at the University of Zürich: report of an inquiry in the winter-semester 2002/2003. http:/www.vam.uzh.ch/umfrage /medstud-umfrage-ws0203.pdf. Accessed May 12, 2004.
18. Harter C, Schellberg D, Möltner A, Kadmon M. Didactic lecture or interactive group discussion? a comparison of the learning success and the student evaluation in biochemistry. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2009;26(2):Doc23.
19. Song SH, Keller JM. Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation. Educ Res Dev. 2001;49(1):5-22.
20. Dochy F, Segers M, Buehl MM. The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: the case of research on prior knowledge. Rev Educ Res. 1999;69(2):145-186.
21. Tergan SO. Hypertext and hypermedia: conception, learning options, learning problems and perspectives. In: Issing LJ, Klimsa P, eds. Information and Teaching With Multimedia. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz PVU; 2002:99-112.
22. Lyon HC, Longnecker DS, Gonzalez J, et al. Correlation between student use of computer-based instruction and high exam scores in pathology. J Med Educ Technol. 1998;6(4):20-26.