In silico archeogenomics unveils modern plant genome organisation, regulation and evolution

Current Opinion in Plant Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 122-130

  Salse, Jérôme ^a  

^a Diversity and Ecophysiology of Cereals   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHEOLOGY; GENETICS; GENOMICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PLANT GENOME; REVIEW;

ARCHAEOLOGY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMICS;

EID: 84859893292     PISSN: 13695266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.01.001     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Salse J., Abrouk M., Murat F., Quraishi U.M., Feuillet C. Improved criteria and comparative genomics tool provide new insights into grass paleogenomics. Brief Bioinform 2009, 10:619-630.
2. Abrouk M., Murat F., Pont C., Messing J., Jackson S., Faraut T., Tannier E., Plomion C., Cooke R., Feuillet C., Salse J. Palaeogenomics of plants: synteny-based modelling of extinct ancestors. Trends Plant Sci 2010, 15:479-487.
3. Gavranović H., Chauve C., Salse J., Tannier E. Mapping ancestral genomes with massive gene loss: a matrix sandwich problem. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:i257-i265.
4. Jaillon O., Aury J.M., Noel B., Policriti A., Clepet C., Casagrande A., Choisne N., Aubourg S., Vitulo N., Jubin C., et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 2007, 449:463-467.
5. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408:796-815.
6. Tuskan G.A., Difazio S., Jansson S., Bohlmann J., Grigoriev I., Hellsten U., Putnam N., Ralph S., Rombauts S., Salamov A., et al. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 2006, 313:1596-1604.
7. Schmutz J., Cannon S.B., Schlueter J., Ma J., Mitros T., Nelson W., Hyten D.L., Song Q., Thelen J.J., Cheng J., et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 2010, 463:178-183.
8. Ming R., Hou S., Feng Y., Yu Q., Dionne-Laporte A., Saw J.H., Senin P., Wang W., Ly B.V., Lewis K.L., et al. The draft genome of the transgenic tropical fruit tree papaya (Carica papaya Linnaeus). Nature 2008, 452:991-996.
9. Shulaev V., Sargent D.J., Crowhurst R.N., Mockler T.C., Folkerts O., Delcher A.L., Jaiswal P., Mockaitis K., Liston A., Mane S.P., et al. The genome of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Nat Genet 2010, 43:109-116.
10. Argout X., Salse J., Aury J.M., Guiltinan M.J., Droc G., Gouzy J., Allegre M., Chaparro C., Legavre T., Maximova S.N., et al. The genome of Theobroma cacao. Nat Genet 2011, 43:101-108.
11. Sato S., Nakamura Y., Kaneko T., Asamizu E., Kato T., Nakao M., Sasamoto S., Watanabe A., Ono A., Kawashima K., et al. Genome structure of the legume, Lotus japonicus. DNA Res 2008, 15:227-239.
12. Velasco R., Zharkikh A., Affourtit J., Dhingra A., Cestaro A., Kalyanaraman A., Fontana P., Bhatnagar S.K., Troggio M., Pruss D., et al. The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus×domestica Borkh.). Nat Genet 2010, 42:833-839.
13. Cabrera A., Kozik A., Howad W., Arus P., Iezzoni A.F., van der Knaap E. Development and bin mapping of a Rosaceae Conserved Ortholog Set (COS) of markers. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:562.
14. Bordat A., Savois V., Nicolas M., Salse J., Chauveau A., Bourgeois M., Potier J., Houtin H., Rond C., Murat F., et al. Translational genomics in legumes allowed placing in silico 5460 unigenes on the pea functional map and identified candidate genes in Pisum sativum L. Genes Genomes Genet 2011, 1:93-103.
15. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 2005, 436:793-800.
16. Paterson A.H., Bowers J.E., Bruggmann R., Dubchak I., Grimwood J., Gundlach H., Haberer G., Hellsten U., Mitros T., Poliakov A., et al. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 2009, 457:551-556.
17. Schnable P.S., Ware D., Fulton R.S., Stein J.C., Wei F., Pasternak S., Liang C., Zhang J., Fulton L., Graves T.A., et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 2009, 326:1112-1115.
18. Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Nature 2010, 463:763-768. International Brachypodium Initiative.
19. Salse J., Bolot S., Throude M., Jouffe V., Piegu B., Quraishi U.M., Calcagno T., Cooke R., Delseny M., Feuillet C. Identification and characterization of conserved duplications between rice and wheat provide new insight into grass genome evolution. Plant Cell 2008, 20:11-24.
20. Stein N., Prasad M., Scholz U., Thiel T., Zhang H., Wolf M., Kota R., Varshney R.K., Perovic D., Grosse I., Graner A. A 1,000-loci transcript map of the barley genome: new anchoring points for integrative grass genomics. Theor Appl Genet 2007, 114:823-839.
21. Salse J., Feuillet C. Paleogenomics in cereals: modelling of ancestors for modern species improvement. C R Biologies 2011, 334:205-211.
22. Salse J., Abrouk M., Bolot S., Guilhot N., Courcelle E., Faraut T., Waugh R., Close T.J., Messing J., Feuillet C. Reconstruction of monocotelydoneous proto-chromosomes reveals faster evolution in plants than in animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:14908-14913.
23. Murat F., Xu J.H., Tannier E., Abrouk M., Guilhot N., Pont C., Messing J., Salse J. Ancestral grass karyotype reconstruction unravels new mechanisms of genome shuffling as a source of plant evolution. Genome Res 2010, 20:1545-1557.
24. Fawcett J.A., Maere S., Van de Peer Y. Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:5737-5742.
25. Tang H., Bowers J.E., Wang X., Paterson A.H. Angiosperm genome comparisons reveal early polyploidy in the monocot lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107:472-477.
26. Jiao Y., Wickett N.J., Ayyampalayam S., Chanderbali A.S., Landherr L., Ralph P.E., Tomsho L.P., Hu Y., Liang H., Soltis P.S., et al. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 2011, 473:97-100.
27. Proost S., Pattyn P., Gerats T., Van de Peer Y. Journey through the past: 150 million years of plant genome evolution. Plant J 2011, 66:58-65.
28. Bolot S., Abrouk M., Masood-Quraishi U., Stein N., Messing J., Feuillet C., Salse J. The 'inner circle' of the cereal genomes. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2009, 12:119-125.
29. Gale M., Devos K.M. Comparative genetics in grasses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:1971-1974.
30. Quraishi U.M., Abrouk M., Bolot S., Pont C., Throude M., Guilhot N., Confolent C., Bortolini F., Praud S., Murigneux A., et al. Genomics in cereals: from genome-wide conserved orthologous set (COS) sequences to candidate genes for trait dissection. Funct Integr Genomics 2009, 9:473-484.
31. Quraishi U.M., Abrouk M., Murat F., Pont C., Foucrier S., Desmaizieres G., Confolent C., Rivière N., Charmet G., Paux E., et al. Cross-genome map based dissection of a nitrogen use efficiency ortho-metaQTL in bread wheat unravels concerted cereal genome evolution. Plant J 2011, 65:745-756.
32. Dassanayake M., Oh D.H., Haas J.S., Hernandez A., Hong H., Ali S., Yun D.J., Bressan R.A., Zhu J.K., Bohnert H.J., Cheeseman J.M. The genome of the extremophile crucifer Thellungiella parvula. Nat Genet 2011, 43:913-918.
33. Van de Peer Y., Fawcett J.A., Proost S., Sterck L., Vandepoele K. The flowering world: a tale of duplications. Trends Plant Sci 2009, 14:680-688.
34. Paterson A.H., Freeling M., Tang H., Wang X. Insights from the comparison of plant genome sequences. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2010, 61:349-372.
35. Van de Peer Y., Maere S., Meyer A. The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat Rev Genet 2009, 10:725-732.
36. Luo M.C., Deal K.R., Akhunov E.D., Akhunova A.R., Anderson O.D., Anderson J.A., Blake N., Clegg M.T., Coleman-Derr D., Conley E.J., et al. Genome comparisons reveal a dominant mechanism of chromosome number reduction in grasses and accelerated genome evolution in Triticeae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:15780-15785.
37. Parisod C., Holderegger R., Brochmann C. Evolutionary consequences of autopolyploidy. New Phytol 2010, 186:5-17.
38. Schubert I., Lysak M.A. Interpretation of karyotype evolution should consider chromosome structural constraints. Trends Genet 2011, 27:207-216.
39. Woodhouse M.R., Schnable J.C., Pedersen B.S., Lyons E., Lisch D., Subramaniam S., Freeling M. Following tetraploidy in maize, a short deletion mechanism removed genes preferentially from one of the two homologs. PLoS Biol 2010, 8:e1000409.
40. Schnable J.C., Springer N.M., Freeling M. Differentiation of the maize subgenomes by genome dominance and both ancient and ongoing gene loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:4069-4074.
41. Wang X., Tang H., Paterson A.H. Seventy million years of concerted evolution of a homoeologous chromosome pair, in parallel, in major Poaceae lineages. Plant Cell 2011, 23:27-37.
42. Jacquemin J., Chaparro C., Laudié M., Berger A., Gavory F., Goicoechea J.L., Wing R.A., Cooke R. Long-range and targeted ectopic recombination between the two homeologous chromosomes 11 and 12 in Oryza species. Mol Biol Evol 2011, 28:3139-3150.
43. Pont C., Murat F., Confolent C., Balzergue S., Salse J. RNA-seq in grain unveils fate of neo- and paleopolyploidization events in bread wheat (/Triticum aestivum/L.). Genome Biol 2011, 12:R119.
44. Throude M., Bolot S., Bosio M., Pont C., Sarda X., Quraishi U.M., Bourgis F., Lessard P., Rogowsky P., Ghesquiere A., et al. Structure and expression analysis of rice paleo-duplications. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:1248-1259.
45. Bekaert M., Edger P.P., Pires J.C., Conant G.C. Two-phase resolution of polyploidy in the Arabidopsis metabolic network gives rise to relative and absolute dosage constraints. Plant Cell 2011, 23:1719-1728.
46. Coate J.E., Doyle J.J. Divergent evolutionary fates of major photosynthetic gene networks following gene and whole genome duplications. Plant Signal Behav 2011, 6:594-597.
47. Thomas B.C., Pedersen B., Freeling M. Following tetraploidy in an Arabidopsis ancestor, genes were removed preferentially from one homeolog leaving clusters enriched in dose-sensitive genes. Genome Res 2006, 16:934-946.
48. Sankoff D., Zheng C., Zhu Q. The collapse of gene complement following whole genome duplication. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:313.
49. Paterson A.H., Chapman B.A., Kissinger J.C., Bowers J.E., Feltus F.A., Estill J.C. Many gene and domain families have convergent fates following independent whole-genome duplication events in Arabidopsis, Oryza, Saccharomyces and Tetraodon. Trends Genet 2006, 22:597-602.
50. Chang P.L., Dilkes B.P., McMahon M., Comai L., Nuzhdin S.V. Homoeolog-specific retention and use in allotetraploid Arabidopsis suecica depends on parent of origin and network partners. Genome Biol 2010, 11:R125.
51. Papp B., Pál C., Hurst L.D. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 2003, 424:194-197.
52. Henry Y., Bedhomme M., Blanc G. History, protohistory and prehistory of the Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome complement. Trends Plant Sci 2006, 11:267-273.
53. Birchler J.A., Veitia R.A. The gene balance hypothesis: implications for gene regulation, quantitative traits and evolution. New Phytol 2010, 186:54-62.