Likelihood to abort an online transaction: Influences from cognitive evaluations, attitudes, and behavioral variables

Information and Management

Volumn 41, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 827-838

  Cho, Jinsook ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitudes toward e shopping; Likelihood to abort an online transaction; Past behavior; Risk and benefit evaluation

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; INTERNET; ONLINE SYSTEMS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SALES;

ATTITUDE TOWARDS E-SHOPPING; LIKELIHOOD TO ABORT AN ONLINE TRANSACTION; PAST BEHAVIOR; RISK AND BENEFIT EVALUATION;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 2342568417     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2003.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. I. Ajzen, M. Fishbein, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980.
2. Anderson J.C., Gerbing D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two step approach. Psychology Bulletin. 103(3):1988;411-423.
3. Armstrong J.S., Overton T.S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research. 26:1977;396-402.
4. Bagozzi R.P., Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 16:1998;74-94.
5. Benjamin R., Wigand R. Electronic market and virtual retail chains on the information superhighway. Sloan Management Review. 36(2):1995;62-73.
6. K. Bollen, Structural Equations with Latent Variables, Wiley, New York, 1989.
7. B. Cox, Online sales keep on growing, Internetnews.com, http://www.internetnews.com/stats/article.phd/1151001, 2002.
8. Direct Marketing Association, 1997-1998 Statistical Fact Book, Direct Marketing Association, New York, 1998.
9. Donthu N., Garcia A. The Internet shopper. Journal of Advertising Research. 39(3):1999;52-58.
10. Eastlick M. Profiling potential adopters of an interactive shopping medium. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management. 27:1996;209-223.
11. Ernst & Young LLP, Ernst & Young LLP-Industry-Consumer-Shopping, http://www.ey.com/industry/consumer/shopping/consumer.esp, 2001.
12. Gehrt K., Carter K. An exploratory assessment of catalog shopping orientation: the existence of convenience and recreational segment. Journal of Retailing. 6(1):1992;29-39.
13. Hwang M.I., Thorn R.G. The effect of user engagement on system success; a meta-analytical integratin of research finding. Information and Management. 35(4):1999;229-236.
14. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 6(1):1999;1-55.
15. J. Jaccard, C.K. Wan, Lisrel Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1996.
16. K. Jöreskog, D. Sörbom, LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide, Scientific Software International, Chicago, 1996.
17. Karahama E., Straub D.W. The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease of use. Information and Management. 35(4):1999;150-237.
18. Keeney R.L. The value of Internet commerce to the consumer. Management Science. 45(4):1999;533-542.
19. Klein L.R. Evaluating the potential of interactive media through a new lens: search versus experience goods. Journal of Business Research. 41(3):1998;95-203.
20. Korgaonkar P.K. Shopping orientations of catalog showroom patrons. Journal of Retailing. 57(1):1981;78-90.
21. Korgaonkar P.K., Wolin L. A multivariate analysis of web usage. Journal of Advertising Research. 39(2):1999;53-68.
22. Lance C.E. Residual centering, exploratory and confirmatory moderator analysis, and decomposition of effects in path models containing interactions. Applied Psychological Measurement. 12(2):1998;163-175.
23. Liao A., Cheung M.T. Internet-based e-shopping and consumer attitudes: an empirical study. Information and Management. 38:2001;299-306.
24. Liu C., Arnett K.P. Exploring the factors associated with web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Information and Management. 38(1):2000;23-33.
25. Lohse G., Bellman S., Johnson E. Consumer buying behavior on the Internet: findings from panel data. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 14(1):2000;15-29.
26. N. Maravilla, The case of the abandoned shopping carts, http://www.powerhomebiz.com/vol13/shoppingcarts.htm/, 2001.
27. Mehta R., Sivadas E. Direct marketing on the Internet: an empirical assessment of consumer attitudes. Journal of Direct Marketing. 8(3):1995;21-32.
28. Owen, Online Consumer Behavior, Filling the gaps in online retailing, http://www2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu/, 2001.
29. J. Peet, Shopping around the web, The Economist, February 2000, p. 26.
30. Quelch J.A., Takeuchi H. Nonstore marketing: fast track or slow. Harvard Business Review. 59(4):1981;59-63.
31. Reynolds F.D. An analysis of catalog buying behavior. Journal of Marketing. 38:1974;47-51.
32. Schlosser A.E., Shavitt S., Kanfer A. Survey of internet users' attitudes toward Internet advertising. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 13(3):1999;34-54.
33. Sheppard B.H., Hartwick J., Warshaw P.R. The theory of reasoned action: a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research. 15(3):1988;325-343.
34. US Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce News, Washington, DC, 2002.