A multidominance approach to appositional constructions

Lingua

Volumn 122, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 554-581

  Heringa, Herman ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Apposition; Case marking; Coordination; Multidominance; Parenthesis; Predication

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859881156     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Acuña-Fariña J.C. The Puzzle of Apposition. On So-called Appositive Structures in English 1996, Universidade, Servicio de Publicacións e Intercambio Científico, Santiago de Compostela.
2. Alexiadou A. On the syntax of temporal adverbs and the nature of Spec, TP. Rivista di Linguistica 2000, 12(1):55-75.
3. Alexiadou A. Adjective syntax and noun raising: word order asymmetries in the DP as the result of adjective distribution. Studia Linguistica 2001, 55(3):217-248.
4. Alexiadou A. Tense marking in the nominal domain. Implications for grammar architecture. Linguistic Yearbook 8 2008, 33-60. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. J. van Craenenbroeck, J. Rooryck (Eds.).
5. Alexiadou A., Wilder C. Adjectival modification and multiple determiners. Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the DP 1998, 303-332. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. A. Alexiadou, C. Wilder (Eds.).
6. Bayer J., Bader M., Meng M. Morphological underspecification meets oblique case: syntactic and processing effects in German. Lingua 2001, 111(4-7):465-514.
7. Berckmans P. Demonstration, apposition and direct reference. Communication and Cognition 1994, 26:499-512.
8. Bergenholtz H. Kasuskongruenz der Apposition, Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen. Sprache und Literatur 1985, 107:21-44.
9. Beukema F., Hoekstra T. Met met PRO of met zonder PRO: een absolute constructie. De Nieuwe Taalgids 1983, 76:532-548.
10. Beukema F., Hoekstra T. Extractions from With-Constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 1984, 15(4):689-698.
11. Bittner M., Hale K. The structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 1996, 27(1):1-68.
12. Bobaljik J.D., Brown S. Interarboreal operations: head movement and the extension requirement. Linguistic Inquiry 1997, 28:345-356.
13. Bolinger D. Adjectives in English: attribution and predication. Lingua 1967, 18:1-34.
14. Burton-Roberts N. Nominal apposition. Foundations of language 1975, 13:391-419.
15. Cardoso, A., De Vries, M., 2010. Internal and external heads in appositive constructions. Ms, University of Lisbon & University of Groningen. http://www.let.rug.nl/dvries/pdf/2010-appositive-constructions-webversion.pdf.
16. Carnie A. Constituent Structure (Oxford Surveys in Syntax & Morphology) 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
17. Chomsky N. Syntactic Structures 1957, Mouton, Den Haag.
18. Chomsky N. The Minimalist Program 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Cinque G. Adverbs and Functional Heads 1999, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
20. Citko B. On the nature of merge: external merge, internal merge, and parallel merge. Linguistic Inquiry 2005, 36:475-496.
21. Citko B. Small clauses reconsidered: not so small and not all alike. Lingua 2008, 118(3):261-295.
22. Corazza E. On epithets qua attributive anaphors. Journal of Linguistics 2005, 41:1-32.
23. De Vries M. The syntax of appositive relativization. On specifying coordination, false free relatives and promotion. Linguistic Inquiry 2006, 37:229-270.
24. De Vries M. Invisible constituents? Parentheses as B-merged adverbial phrases. Parentheticals 2007, 203-234. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. N. Dehé, Y. Kavalova (Eds.).
25. De Vries M. The representation of language within language: a syntactico-pragmatic typology of direct speech. Studia Linguistica 2008, 62:39-77.
26. De Vries M. Specifying coordination: an investigation into the syntax of dislocation, extraposition and parenthesis. Language and Linguistics: Emerging Trends 2009, 37-98. Nova, New York. C.R. Dryer (Ed.).
27. De Vries M. On multidominance and linearization. Biolinguistics 2009, 3:344-403.
28. De Vries, M., in press. Unconventional mergers. In: Uribe-Etxebarria, M., Valmala, V. (Eds.), Ways of Structure Building. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
29. Del Gobbo F. On the syntax and semantics of appositive relative clauses. Parentheticals 2007, 173-201. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. N. Dehé, Y. Kavalova (Eds.).
30. Den Dikken M. Relators and Linkers. The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion and Copulas 2006, MIT Press, Cambridge.
31. Dever J. Complex demonstratives. Linguistics and Philosophy 2001, 24:271-330.
32. Doron E. The discourse function of appositives. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics and of the Workshop on Discourse 1994, 53-65. Hebrew University, Jerusalem. R. Buchalla, A. Mitwoch (Eds.).
33. Epstein S. Un-principled syntax and the derivation of syntactic relations. Working Minimalism 1999, 317-346. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Epstein, N. Hornstein (Eds.).
34. Espinal M. The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 1991, 67:726-762.
35. Evans G. Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 1980, 11(2):337-362.
36. Grano, Th., 2006. " Me and her" meets " he and I": case, person, and linear ordering in English coordinated pronouns. Honors Thesis, Honors Program Stanford University.
37. Guimarães, M., 2004. Derivation and representation of syntactic amalgams. PhD Dissertation, University of Maryland.
38. Haegeman, L., 1991. Parenthetical adverbials: the radical orphanage approach. In: Chiba, S., Ogawa, A., Fuiwara, Y., Yamada, N., Koma, O., Yagi, T. (Eds.), Aspects of Modern English Linguistics: Papers Presented to Masatome Ukaji on his 60th Birthday. Kaitakusha, Tokyo, pp. 232-254.
39. Haegeman L. Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 2006, 116:1651-1669.
40. Heringa H. Appositional constructions: coordination and predication. Proceedings of the Fifth Semantics in the Netherlands Day 2007, 67-82. RS Staten Kopie, Den Haag. M.E. Kluck, E.J. Smits (Eds.).
41. Heringa, H., in press. Appositional constructions. PhD Dissertation, University of Groningen.
42. Heringa H., De Vries M. Een semantische classificatie voor apposities. Nederlandse Taalkunde 2008, 13(1):60-87.
43. Heycock C., Kroch A. Pseudocleft connectedness: implications for the LF interface level. Linguistic Inquiry 1999, 30(3):365-397.
44. Heycock C., Zamparelli R. Friends and colleagues: coordination, plurality, and the structure of DP. Natural Language Semantics 2005, 13:201-270.
45. Hockett C.F. Attribution and apposition. American Speech 1955, 30:99-102.
46. Hoeksema J. The semantics of non-Boolean. Journal of Semantics 1988, 6(1):19-40.
47. Huddleston R., Pullum G.K. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
48. Johannessen J.B. Coordination 1998, Oxford University Press, New York.
49. Kayne R. The Antisymmetry of Syntax 1994, MIT Press, Boston.
50. Klein, M., 1977. Appositionele constructies in het Nederlands. PhD Dissertation, University of Nijmegen.
51. Koster, J., 2000. Extraposition as parallel construal. Ms, University of Groningen, Groningen. http://www.let.rug.nl/koster/papers/parallel.pdf.
52. Kraak A., Klooster W. Syntaxis 1968, Stam-Kemperman, Culemborg.
53. Lamontagne G., Travis L. The syntax of adjacency. Proceedings of WCCFL 1987, 6:173-186.
54. Landau I. Two routes of control: evidence from case transmission in Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2008, 26:877-924.
55. Larson R.K., Takahashi N. Order and interpretation in prenominal relative clauses. Proceedings of the Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics II. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 54 2007, 101-120. MITWPL, Cambridge, MA. M. Kelepir, B. öztürk (Eds.).
56. Larson R.K., Yamakido H. Ezafe and the deep position of nominal modifiers. Adjectives and Adverbs. Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse 2008, 43-70. Oxford University Press, Oxford. L. McNally, C. Kennedy (Eds.).
57. Lasersohn P. The semantics of appositive and pseudo-appositive NP's. Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 1986, 3:311-322.
58. Leirbukt O. über dativische Apposition bei akkusativischem Bezugswort im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte 1978, 55:1-17.
59. Maling J., Sprouse R.A. Structural case, specifier-head relations, and the case of predicate NPs. Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax 1995, 167-186. Kluwer, Dordrecht. H. Haider, S. Olsen, S. Vikner (Eds.).
60. Matushansky O. A case study of predication. Studies in Formal Slavic Linguistics. Contributions from Formal Description of Slavic Languages 6.5 2008, 213-239. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main. F. Marušič, R. Žaucer (Eds.).
61. Matushansky, O., 2009. Some cases of Russian. Ms, University of Utrecht, Utrecht. http://www.let.uu.nl/~Ora.Matushansky/personal/Downloads/FDSL_7.5.pdf.
62. Mikkelsen L. Copular Clauses. Specification, Predication and Equation 2005, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
63. Moro A. The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure 1997, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
64. Munn A. Coordinate structure and X-bar theory. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 1987, 4(1):121-140.
65. Munn, A., 1993. Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures. PhD Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
66. Neeleman A., Weerman F. Flexible Syntax. A Theory of Case and Arguments 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
67. Nouwen R. On appositives and dynamic binding. Research on Language and Computation 2007, 5(1):87-102.
68. Nunes J. Sideward movement. Linguistic Inquiry 2001, 32:303-344.
69. O'Connor, K.M., 2008. Aspects de la syntaxe et de l'interprétation de l'apposition à antécédent nominal. PhD Dissertation, Université Charles de Gaulle, Lille 3.
70. Parrott, J.K., 2007. Distributed morphological mechanisms of Labovian variation in morphosyntax. PhD Dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington.
71. Partee B. Copula inversion puzzles in English and Russian. Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Seattle Meeting 1998, 361-395. Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor. K. Dziwirek, H. Coats, C. Vakareliyska (Eds.).
72. Potts C. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures 2005, Oxford University Press, New York.
73. Potts C. Conventional implicatures, a distinguished class of meanings. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces 2007, 475-501. Oxford University Press, Oxford. G. Ramchand, C. Reiss (Eds.).
74. Progovac L. Structure for coordination, Part I and II. Glot International 1998, 3(7):3-6. 3 (8), 3-9.
75. Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svarvik J. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language 1985, Longman, London.
76. Roberts C. Anaphora in intensional contexts. The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory 1996, 215-246. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. S. Lappin (Ed.).
77. Ross, J.R., 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD Thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Published as Infinite Syntax, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1986.
78. Rothstein S. Predicates and their Subjects 2001, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
79. Sag I.A., Gazdar G., Wasow Th., Weisler S. Coordination and how to distinguish categories. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1985, 3:117-171.
80. Schindler W. Untersuchungen zur Grammatik appositionsverdächtiger Einheiten im Deutschen 1990, Niemeyer, Tübingen.
81. Schütze C.T. On the nature of default case. Syntax 2001, 4(3):205-238.
82. Sigur{eth}sson H.A. The Nom/Acc alternation in Germanic. Issues in Comparative Germanic Syntax 2006, 13-50. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. J. Hartmann, L. Molnarfi (Eds.).
83. Smith, C., 1964. Determiners and relative clauses in a generative grammar of English. Language 40, 37-52. Reprinted in: Reibel, S., Schane, S. (Eds.), Modern Studies in English. Prentice-Hall, New York, pp. 247-263.
84. Stassen, L., 2008. Zero copula for predicate nominals. In: Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M., Gil, D., Comrie, B. (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Max Planck Digital Library, Munich (Chapter 120). http://wals.info/feature/description/120.
85. Stowell T. Sequence of perfect. Recent Advances in the Syntax and Semantics of Tense, Mood and Aspect 2007, 123-146. Mouton De Gruyter, Berlin. L. de Saussure, J. Moeschler, G. Puskas (Eds.).
86. Ter Beek, J., 2008. Restructuring and infinitival complements in Dutch. PhD Dissertation, University of Groningen.
87. Van Riemsdijk H. The case of German adjectives. Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and Related Puzzles 1983, Reidel, Dordrecht. F. Heny, B. Richards (Eds.).
88. Van Riemsdijk H. Grafts follow from merge. Phases of Interpretation (Studies in Generative Grammar 91) 2006, 17-44. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. M. Frascarelli (Ed.).
89. Van Riemsdijk H. Grappling with graft. Structure Preserved, Studies in Syntax for Jan Koster 2010, 289-298. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. C.J.W. Zwart, M. De Vries (Eds.).
90. Vater, H., 2006. Kasus in Appositionen. Lyon Linguistique Allemande (LYLIA) 8. http://langues.univ-lyon2.fr/sites/langues/IMG/pdf/Vater_H_2006.pdf.
91. Vlach F. Temporal adverbials, tenses and the perfect. Linguistics and Philosophy 1993, 16:231-283.
92. Wang L., McCready E., Reese B. Nominal appositives in context. Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL 2004) 2004, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
93. Weerman F., Evers-Vermeul J. Pronouns and case. Lingua 2002, 111(4):301-338.
94. Williams E. Transformationless grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 1981, 12:645-654.
95. Winter W. Vom Genitiv im heutigen Deutschen. Zeitschrift für deutsche Sprache 1966, 22:21-35.
96. Zamparelli, R., 2000. Layers in the determiner phrase. Revised PhD Dissertation, University of Bergamo.
97. Zwart C.J.W. Ikke en de default-naamval: een reactie op Hoeksema. Tabu 2000, 30(3-4):175-182.
98. Zwart, C.J.W., 2007. On the tense of infinitives in Dutch. Ms, University of Groningen, Groningen. http://www.let.rug.nl/zwart/docs/lin2007.pdf.