On appositives and dynamic binding

Research on Language and Computation

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 87-102

  Nouwen, Rick ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Appositives; Dynamic binding; Multi dimensional semantics; Quantifiers

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248350040     PISSN: 15707075     EISSN: 15728706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11168-006-9019-6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Asher, N., & Wang, L. (2003). Ambiguity and anaphora with plurals in discourse. In proceedings of Semantics and linguistic theory 13 (SALT 13). Seattle, Washington: University of Washington.
2. van den Berg, M. ( 1996). 'Some aspects of the internal structure of discourse: 'The dynamics of nominal anaphora. Ph.D. thesis, ILLC, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
3. Elworthy, D. (1995). A theory of anaphoric information. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, 297-332.
4. Evans, G. (1977). Pronouns, quantifiers and relative clauses. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 7, 467-536.
5. del Gobbo, F. (2003a). Appositives and quantification. In E. Kaiser, & S. Arunachalam (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual Penn linguistics colloquium, (Vol. 9.1). Pennsylvania working papers in linguistics, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania.
6. del Gobbo, F. (2003b). Appositives at the interface. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Irvine.
7. Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, 3: Speech acts. New York: AP.
8. Groenendijk, J., & Stokhof, M. (1991). Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 39-100.
9. Jayez, J., & Rossari, C. (2005). Parentheticals as conventional implicatures. In F. Corblin, & H. de Swart (Eds.), Handbook of French semantics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
10. Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
11. Karttunen, L., & Peters, S. (1979). Conventional implicature. In C.-K. Oh & D. A. Dinneen (Eds.), Presupposition, syntax and semantics (Vol. 11). New York: Academic Press.
12. Krifka, M. (1996). Parametrized sum individuals for plural reference and partitive quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy, 19, 555-598.
13. McCawley, J. (1998). The syntaxtic phenomena of English. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
14. Nouwen, R. (2003). Plural pronominal anaphora in context. No. 84 in Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics Dissertations. Utrecht: LOT.
15. Nouwen, R. (2006). On dependent pronouns and dynamic semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic. (to appear).
16. Potts, C. (2005). The logic of conventional implicatures, Oxford studies in theoretical linguistics (Vol. 7). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Rooth, M. (1985). Association with focus. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetss, Amherst.
18. Vermeulen, K. (1993). Sequence semantics for dynamic predicate logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2, 217-254.
19. Visser, A. (2002). The donkey and the monoid. Dynamic semantics with control elements. Journal of Logic Language and Information, 11(1), 107-131.
20. Visser, A., & Vermeulen, C. (1996). Dynamic bracketing and discourse representation. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 37, 321-365.
21. Wang, L., McCready, E., & Asher N. (2006). Information dependency in quantificational subordination. In K. von Heusinger, & K. Turner (Eds.), Where semantics meets pragmatics (Crispi 16). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. Wang, L., Reese, B., & McCready E. (2005). The projection problem of nominal appositives. Snippets, 10, 13-14.