The syntax of appositive relativization: On specifying coordination, false free relatives, and promotion

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 229-270

  De Vries, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Apposition; Appositive; Coordination; Free relative; Nonrestrictive; Relative clause; Syntax

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646578536     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/ling.2006.37.2.229     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Alexiadou, Artemis, Paul Law, André Meinunger, and Chris Wilder. 2000. Introduction. In The syntax of relative clauses, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Paul Law, André Meinunger, and Chris Wilder, 1-51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2. Bennis, Hans. 2001. Tegengestelde krachten in taal. Inaugural lecture, University of Amsterdam.
3. Bianchi, Valentina. 1999. Consequences of antisymmetry: Headed relative clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
4. Bianchi, Valentina. 2000. Some issues in the syntax of relative determiners. In The syntax of relative clauses, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Paul Law, André Meinunger, and Chris Wilder, 53-81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
5. Borsley, Robert D. 1992. More on the difference between English restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 28:139-148.
6. Borsley, Robert D. 1997. Relative clauses and the theory of phrase structure. Linguistic Inquiry 28:629-647.
7. Canac-Marquis, Réjean, and Mireille Tremblay. 1998. The wh-feature and the syntax of restrictive and non-restrictive relatives in French and English. In Theoretical analyses on Romance languages, ed. by José Lema and Esthela Treviño, 127-141, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Carlson, Greg. 1977. Amount relatives. Language 53:520-542.
9. Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8:425-504.
10. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1982. On the theory of relative clauses and markedness. The Linguistic Review 1: 247-294.
11. Culy, Christopher. 1990. The syntax and semantics of internally headed relative clauses. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
12. Dekkers, Joost. 1999. Derivations and evaluations: On the syntax of subjects and complementizers. Utrecht: LOT.
13. Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2003. Appositives at the interface. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
14. Delorme, Evelyne, and Ray C. Dougherty. 1972. Appositive NP constructions. Foundations of Language 8:2-29.
15. Demirdache, Hamida. 1991. Resumptive chains in restrictive relatives, appositives and dislocation structures. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
16. Doron, Edit. 1994. The discourse function of appositives. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics and of the Workshop on Discourse, ed. by Rhonna Buchall and Anita Mittwoch, 53-62, Jerusalem: Hebrew University.
17. Emonds, Joseph. 1979. Appositive relatives have no properties. Linguistic Inquiry 10:211-243.
18. Evans, Gareth. 1980. Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 11:337-362.
19. Fabb, Nigel. 1990. The difference between English restrictive and nonrestrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 26:57-78.
20. Givón, Talmy. 1984. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Goodall, Grant. 1987. Parallel structures in syntax: Coordination, causatives and restructuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Groos, Anneke, and Henk van Riemsdijk, 1981. Matching effects in free relatives: A parameter of core grammar. In Theory of markedness in generative grammar, ed. by Adriana Belletti, Luciana Brandi, and Luigi Rizzi, 171-216. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.
23. Grootveld, Marjan. 1994. Parsing coordination generatively. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University.
24. Grosu, Alexander. 2000. Type-resolution in relative constructions. In The syntax of relative clauses, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Paul Law, André Meinunger, and Chris Wilder, 83-119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Grosu, Alexander, and Fred Landman. 1998. Strange relatives of the third kind. Natural Language Semantics 6:125-170.
26. Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In Aspects of modern English linguistics: Papers presented to Masatome Ukaji on his 60th birthday, ed. by Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Yamada, Osama Koma, and Takao Yagi, 232-254. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
27. Hagman, Roy S. 1973. Nama Hottentot grammar. Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
28. Halitsky, David, 1974. Deep Structure appositive and complement NPs. Language 50:446-455.
29. Hartmann, Katharina. 2000. Right node raising and gapping: Interface conditions on prosodic deletion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
30. Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Eogical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
31. Jackendoff, Ray, 1977, X̄ syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
32. Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 1998. Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
34. Keenan, Edward. 1985. Relative clauses. In Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 2, Complex constructions, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 141-170, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Keenan, Edward, and Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8:63-99.
36. Klein, Maarten. 1976. Appositionele NP's in het Nederlands. De Nieuwe Taalgids 69:139-153.
37. Klein, Maarten. 1977. Appositionele constructies in het Nederlands. Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen.
38. Koster, Jan. 1995. Extraposition as coordination. Paper presented at MPI and Von Humboldt University, Berlin.
39. Koster, Jan. 2000. Extraposition as parallel construal. Ms., University of Groningen.
40. Kraak, Remmert, and Wim Klooster. 1968. Syntaxis. Culemborg: Stam-Kemperman.
41. Lasnik, Howard. 1989. Essays on anaphora. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
42. Lasnik, Howard, and Tim Stowell. 1991. Weakest crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 22:687-720.
43. Lehmann, Christian. 1984. Der Relativsatz. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
44. Link, Godehard. 1984. Hydras: On the logic of relative constructions with multiple heads. In Varieties of formal semantics: Proceedings of the fourth Amsterdam Colloquium, September 1982, ed. by Fred Landman and Frank Veldman, 245-257. Dordrecht: Foris.
45. Lipták, Anikó. 1998. On restrictive versus appositive relative clauses. Paper presented at the conference "Linguistics in the Netherlands," Utrecht.
46. McCawley, James D. 1982. Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 91-106.
47. Moltmann, Friederike. 1992. Coordination and comparatives. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
48. Perzanowski, Dennis. 1980. Appositive relatives do have properties. In Proceedings of NELS 10, 355-368. Ottawa, Ont.: University of Ottawa.
49. Platzack, Christer. 1997. A representational account of restrictive and non-restrictive relatives: The case of Swedish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 59:65-95.
50. 0 account of restrictive and non-restrictive relatives: The case of Swedish. In The syntax of relative clauses, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Paul Law, André Meinunger, and Chris Wilder, 265-308. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
51. Progovac, Ljiljana. 1998. Structure for coordination. Parts I and II. Glot International 3/7:3-6
52. and 3/8:3-9.
53. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
54. Rijk, Rudolph de. 1972. Relative clauses in Basque: A guided tour. In The Chicago which hunt: Papers from the Relative Clause Festival, ed. by Paul Peranteau, Judith Levi, and Gloria Phares, 115-135. Chicago: University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society.
55. Rooryck, Johan. 1997. A unified analysis of the French interrogative and complementizer quilque. Paper presented at the 26th annual Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, University of California, Irvine, 20-22 February.
56. Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Published as Infinite syntax! Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, 1986.
57. Safir, Ken. 1986. Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17:663-689.
58. Sells, Peter. 1985. Restrictive and non-restrictive modification. CSLI report 85-28. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Information.
59. Skrabalova, Hana. 2003. La syntaxe de la coordination [Conj DP Conj DP]: Comparaison entre le français, le tchèque et l'anglais. Paper presented at the Workshop on Coordination, Université Paris 7, 1 March.
60. Smith, Carlota S. 1964. Determiners and relative clauses in a generative grammar of English. Language 40: 37-52.
61. Smits, Rik. 1988. The relative and cleft constructions of the Germanic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris.
62. Smits, Rik. 1991. On the division of labour between the grammar and the parser: Some evidence from matching phenomena. In Issues in Germanic syntax, ed. by Werner Abraham, Wim Kosmeijer, and Eric Reuland, 119-134. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
63. Stockwell, Robert P., Paul Schachter, and Barbara H. Partee. 1973. The major syntactic structures of English. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
64. Sturm, Arie. 1986. Primaire syntactische structuren in het Nederlands. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
65. Sturm, Arie. 1995. SGF-coördinatie bij nader inzien: Verklaring van de eigenschappen en ongehoorde mogelijkheden. De Nieuwe Taalgids 88:333-353.
66. Stuurman, Frits. 1983. Appositives and X-bar theory. Linguistic Inquiry 14:736-744.
67. Thompson, Sandra A. 1971. The Deep Structure of relative clauses. In Studies in linguistic semantics, ed. by Charles Fillmore and Terence Langendoen, 78-94. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
68. Toribio, Almeida J. 1992. Proper government in Spanish subject relativization. Probus 4:291-304.
69. Veld, Joop. 1993. Postverbal constituents in Dutch and Turkish. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
70. Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1974. French relative clauses. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
71. Vries, Mark de. 2000. Appositive relative clauses. Linguistics in the Netherlands 17:221-231.
72. Vries, Mark de. 2002. The syntax of relativization. Utrecht: LOT.
73. Vries, Mark de. 2004a. Congruentie-effecten in uitbreidende en vrije relatieve zinnen. Nederlandse Taalkunde 9:29-47.
74. Vries, Mark de. 2004b. Head-internal relative clauses in Dutch? Linguistics in the Netherlands 21:193-204.
75. Vries, Mark de. 2004c. Parataxis as a different type of asymmetric Merge. In Proceedings of IPSI-2004, Pescara. Interfaces Conference, hosted by the International Conference on Advances in the Internet, Processing, Systems, and Interdisciplinary Research. Available at http://odur.let.rug.nl/~dvries/pdf/ 2004-asymmetry.pdf.
76. Vries, Mark de. 2005. Coordination and syntactic hierarchy. Studia Linguistica 59:83-185.
77. Vries, Mark de. To appear. Possessive relatives and (heavy) pied piping. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 9.
78. Wiltschko, Martina. 1998. On the syntax and semantics of (relative) pronouns and determiners. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2:143-181.