Differential attraction and repulsion of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on molecularly smooth titanium films

Scientific Reports

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Ivanova, Elena P ^a   Truong, Vi Khanh ^a   Webb, Hayden K ^a   Baulin, Vladimir A ^b,c   Wang, James Y ^a   Mohammodi, Narges ^a   Wang, Feng ^a   Fluke, Christopher ^a   Crawford, Russell J ^a  

^a SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

BACTERIAL ADHESION; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 84859784656     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep00165     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ploux, L. et al. Opposite responses of cells and bacteria to micro/nanopatterned surfaces prepared by pulsed plasma polymerization and UV-irradiation. Langmuir 25, 8161-8169 (2009).
2. Truong, V. K. et al. Effect of ultrafine-grained titanium surfaces on adhesion of bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotech 83, 925-937 (2009).
3. Gentile, F. et al. Cells preferentially grow on rough substrates. Biomaterials 31, 7205-7212 (2010).
4. Puckett, S. D., Taylor, E., Raimondo, T. & Webster, T. J. The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. Biomaterials 31, 706-713 (2010).
5. Hochbaum, A. I. & Aizenberg, J. Bacteria pattern spontaneously on periodic nanostructure arrays. Nano Letters 10, 3717-3721 (2010).
6. Ivanova, E. P., Pham, D. K., Wright, J. P. & Nicolau, D. V. Detection of coccoid forms of Sulfitobacter mediterraneus using atomic force microscopy. FEMS Microbiology Letters 214, 177-181 (2002). (Pubitemid 35287035)
7. Rowan, B., Wheeler, M. A. & Crooks, R. M. Patterning bacteria within hyperbranched polymer film templates. Langmuir 18, 9914-9917 (2002).
8. Rozhok, S. et al. Attachment of motile bacterial cells to prealigned holed microarrays. Langmuir 22, 11251-11254 (2006). (Pubitemid 46129669)
9. Ivanova, E. P. et al. Staleya guttiformis attachment on poly(tertbutylmethacrylate) polymeric surfaces. Micron 39, 1197-1204 (2008).
10. Mitik-Dineva, N. et al. Impact of nano-topography on bacterial attachment. Biotechnology Journal 3, 536-544 (2008). (Pubitemid 351618739)
11. Webb, H. K., Crawford, R. J., Sawabe, T. & Ivanova, E. P. Poly(ethylene terephthalate) polymer surfaces as a substrate for bacterial attachment and biofilm formation. Microbes and Environments 24, 39-42 (2009).
12. Mitik-Dineva, N. et al. Differences in colonisation of five marine bacteria on two types of glass surfaces. Biofouling 25, 621-631 (2009).
13. Mitik-Dineva, N. et al. Bacterial attachment on optical fibre surfaces. Biofouling 26, 461-470 (2010).
14. Díaz C., Schilardi, P. L., Salvarezza, R. C. & Fernádez Lorenzo de Mele, M. Nano/Microscale Order Affects the Early Stages of Biofilm Formation on Metal Surfaces. Langmuir 23, 11206-11210 (2007).
15. Mitik-Dineva, N. et al. Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Attachment Patterns on Glass Surfaces with Nanoscale Roughness. Current Microbiology 58, 268-273 (2009).
16. Whitehead, K. A., Colligon, J. & Verran, J. Retention of microbial cells in substratum surface features of micrometer and sub-micrometer dimensions. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 41, 129-138 (2005). (Pubitemid 40298826)
17. An, Y. H. et al. Rapid quantification of Staphylococci adhered to titanium surfaces using image analyzed epifluorescence microscopy. Journal of Microbiological Methods 24, 29-40 (1995). (Pubitemid 26015111)
18. Boulange Petermann, L., Rault, J. & Bellon-Fontaine, M. N. Adhesion of Streptococcus thermophilus to stainless steel with different surface topography and roughness. Biofouling 11, 201-216 (1997). (Pubitemid 27461701)
19. Medilanski, E., Kaufmann, K., Wick, L. Y., Wanner, O. & Harms, H. Influence of the surface topography of stainless steel on bacterial adhesion. Biofouling 18, 193-203 (2002). (Pubitemid 34766793)
20. Li, B. & Logan, B. E. Bacterial adhesion to glass and metal-oxide surfaces. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 36, 81-90 (2004). (Pubitemid 38903270)
21. Whitehead, K. A., Rogers, D., Colligon, J., Wright, C. & Verran, J. Use of the atomic force microscope to determine the effect of substratumsurface topography on the ease of bacterial removal. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 51, 44-53 (2006). (Pubitemid 44094030)
22. Ivanova, E. P. et al. Impact of Nanoscale Roughness of Titanium thin films surfaces on Bacterial Retention. Langmuir 26, 1973-1982 (2010).
23. Truong, V. K. et al. The influence of nanoscale surface roughness on bacterial adhesion to ultrafine-grained titanium. Biomaterials 31, 3674-3683 (2010).
24. Wang, J. Y., Ghantasala, M. K. & McLean, R. J. Bias sputtering effect on ultra-thin SmCo5 films exhibiting large perpendicular coercivity. Thin Solid Films 517, 656-660 (2008).
25. Jeyachandran, Y. L. et al. Properties of titanium thin films deposited by dc magnetron sputtering. Materials Science and Engineering A 431, 277-284 (2006). (Pubitemid 44164214)
26. McCafferty, E. & Wightman, J. P. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy sputter profile study of the native air-formed oxide film on titanium. Applied Surface Science 143, 92-100 (1999).
27. Bertoi, I., Mohai, M., Sullivan, J. L. & Saied, S. O. Surface characterisation of plasma-nitrided titanium: an XPS study. Applied Surface Science 84, 357-371 (1995).
28. Cai, K., Muller, M., Bossert, J., Rechtenbach, A. & Jandt, K. Surface structure and composition of flat titanium thin films as a function of film thickness and evaporation rate. Appl Surf Sci 250, 252-267 (2005). (Pubitemid 41162306)
29. Qu, Z. W. & Kroes, G. J. Theoretical study of the electronic structure and stability of titanium dioxide clusters (TiO2)n with n 5 129. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 110, 8998-9007 (2006).
30. McIntyre, N. S., Thompson, K. R. & Weltner Jr, W. Spectroscopy of titanium oxide and titanium dioxide molecules in inert matrices at 4uK. Journal of Physical Chemistry 75, 3243-3249 (1971).
31. Gadelmawla, E. S., Koura, M. M., Maksoud, T. M. A., Elewa, I. M. & Soliman, H. H. Roughness parameters. J Mater Process Technol 123, 133-145 (2002). (Pubitemid 34249719)
32. Lamolle, S. F. et al. The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of titanium surface on nanostructural and chemical changes and the growth of MC3T3-E1 cells. Biomaterials 30, 736-742 (2009).
33. Karunasiri, R. P. U., Bruinsma, R. & Rudnick, J. Thin-film growth and the shadow instability. Phys Rev Lett 62, 788-791 (1989).
34. Wenzel, R. N. Surface roughness and contact angle. Journal of Physical & Colloid Chemistry 53, 1466-1467 (1949).
35. Bayoudh, S. et al. Quantification of the adhesion free energy between bacteria and hydrophobic and hydrophilic substrata. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 26, 300-305 (2006). (Pubitemid 43254797)
36. Bruinsma, G. M., Van Der Mei, H. C. & Busscher, H. J. Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. Biomaterials 22, 3217-3224 (2001). (Pubitemid 32923328)
37. Koch, A. L. Bacterial wall as target for attack: Past, present, and future research. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16, 673-687 (2003). (Pubitemid 37296555)
38. Harold, F. M. Bacterial morphogenesis: learning how cells make cells. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 10, 591-595 (2007). (Pubitemid 350180582)
39. Whatmore, A. M. & Reed, R. H. Determination of Turgor Pressure in Bacillus subtilis:APossible Role forK1 in Turgor Regulation. J. Gen. Microbiol. 136, 2521-2526 (1990).
40. Arnoldi, M. et al. Bacterial turgor pressure can be measured by atomic force microscopy. Phys. Rev. E 62, 1034-1044 (2000).
41. Netz, R. R. Complete Unbinding of Fluid Membranes in the Presence of Short-Ranged Forces. Phys. Rev. E 51, 2286-2294 (1995).
42. Prost, J., Manneville, J. B. & Bruinsma, R. Fluctuation-magnification of nonequilibrium membranes near a wall. Eur. Phys. J. B 1, 465-480 (1998). (Pubitemid 128439234)
43. Marrink, S. J. & Mark, A. E. Effect of undulations on surface tension in simulated bilayers. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 105, 6122-6127 (2001). (Pubitemid 35339078)
44. Pierres, A., Benoliel, A. M., Touchard, D. & Bongrand, P. How cells tiptoe on adhesive surfaces before sticking. Biophysical Journal 94, 4114-4122 (2008).
45. Pierres, A., Monnet-Corti, V., Benoliel, A. M. & Bongrand, P. Do membrane undulations help cells probe the world? Trends Cell Biol. 19, 428-433 (2009).
46. Cretel, E., Pierres, A., Benoliel, A. M. & Bongrand, P. How Cells Feel Their Environment: A Focus on Early Dynamic Events. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 1, 5-14 (2008).
47. Öner, D. & McCarthy, T. J. Ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Effects of topography length scales on wettability. Langmuir 16, 7777-7782 (2000).
48. Barnes, D., Fluke, C., Bourke, P. & Parry, O. An advanced, three-dimensional plotting library for astronomy. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia 23, 82-93 (2006). (Pubitemid 44126804)
49. Barnes, D. & Fluke, C. Incorporating interactive three-dimensional graphics in astronomy research papers. New Astronomy 13, 599-605 (2008).
50. GAUSSIAN09 (Washington, CT., 2009).
51. Heydorn, A. et al. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. Microbiology 146, 2395-2407 (2000).