Correction to A stochastic detection and retrieval model for the study of metacognition [Psychological Review, (2011)] DOI:10.1037/a0025960;A stochastic detection and retrieval model for the study of metacognition

Psychological Review

Volumn 119, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 186-200

  Jang, Yoonhee ^a   Wallsten, Thomas S ^b   Huber, David E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Confidence judgment accuracy; Criterion variability; Judgments of learning; Metacognition; Signal detection theory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEARNING; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RECALL; RECOGNITION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; TIME;

COGNITION; CUES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LEARNING; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84859779054     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0026619     Document Type: Erratum

References (56)

1. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Caski (Eds.), Proceeding of the second international symposium on information theory (pp. 267-281). Budapest, Hungary: Akademiai Kiado.
2. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.4.548
3. Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., & Sanvito, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on easy of processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 610-632. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90016-8
4. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55-68. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.127.1.55
5. Benjamin, A. S., Diaz, M., & Wee, S. (2009). Signal detection with criterion noise: Applications to recognition memory. Psychological Review, 116, 84-115. doi:10.1037/a0014351
6. Bisanz, G. L., Vesonder, G. T., & Voss, J. F. (1978). Knowledge of one's own responding and the relation of such knowledge to learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 25, 116-128. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(78)90042-5
7. Busey, T. A., Tunnicliff, J., Loftus, G. R., & Loftus, E. F. (2000). Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 26-48. doi:10.3758/BF03210724
8. Clarke, F. R., Birdsall, T. G., & Tanner, W. P., Jr. (1959). Two types of ROC curves and definitions of parameters. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 31, 629-630. doi:10.1121/1.1907764
9. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur? Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 545-565. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1026
10. Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2007). The role of memory for past test in underconfidence with practice effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 238-244. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.238
11. Galvin, S. J., Podd, J. V., Drga, V., & Whitmore, J. (2003). Type 2 tasks in the theory of signal detectability: Discrimination between correct and incorrect decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 843-876. doi:10.3758/BF03196546
12. Gardiner, J. M., & Klee, H. (1976). Memory for remembered events: An assessment of output monitoring in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 227-233. doi:10.1016/0022-5371(76)90021-9
13. Gonzalez, R., & Nelson, T. O. (1996). Measuring ordinal association in situations that contain tied scores. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 159-165. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.159
14. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley.
15. Heathcote, A. (2003). Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1210-1230. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1210
16. Jang, Y., & Nelson, T. O. (2005). How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 308-326. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.308
17. Jang, Y., Wixted, J. T., & Huber, D. E. (2009). Testing signal-detection models of yes/no and two-alternative forced-choice recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 291-306. doi: 10.1037/a0015525
18. Jang, Y., Wixted, J. T., & Huber, D. E. (2011). The diagnosticity of individual data for model selection: Comparing signal-detection models of recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 751-757. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0096-7
19. Kimball, D. R., & Metcalfe, J. (2003). Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory. Memory & Cognition, 31, 918-929. doi:10.3758/BF03196445
20. King, J. F., Zechmeister, E. B., & Shaughnessy, J. J. (1980). Judgments of knowing: The influence of retrieval practice. The American Journal of Psychology, 93, 329-343. doi:10.2307/1422236
21. Klee, H., & Gardiner, J. M. (1976). Memory for remembered events: Contrasting recall and recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 471-478. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(76)90042-6
22. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's knowledge during study: A cueutilization framework to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349
23. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490-517. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490
24. Koriat, A., Levy-Sadot, R., Edry, E., & de Marcas, S. (2003). What do we know about what we cannot remember? Accessing the semantic attributes of words that cannot be recalled. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1095-1105. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1095
25. Koriat, A., Sheffer, L., & Ma'ayan, H. (2002). Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: Judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 147-162. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.131.2.147
26. Lovelace, E. A. (1984). Metamemory: Monitoring future recallability during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 756-766. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.756
27. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28. Masson, M. E. J., & Rotello, C. M. (2009). Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: Implica-tions for studies of metacognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 509-527. doi: 10.1037/a0014876
29. Merritt, P., Hirshman, E., Hsu, J., & Berrigan, M. (2005). Metamemory without the memory: Are people aware of midazolam-induced amnesia? Psychopharmacology, 177, 336-343. doi:10.1007/s00213-004-1958-8
30. Mueller, S. T., & Weidermann, C. T. (2008). Decision noise: An expla-nation for observed violations of signal detection theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 465-494. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.3.465
31. Navarro, D. J., Pitt, M. A., & Myung, J. I. (2004). Assessing the distinguishability of models and the informativeness of data. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 47-84. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.11.001
32. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.109
33. Nelson, T. O. (1986). ROC curves and measures of discrimination accuracy: A reply to Swets. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 128-132. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.128
34. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The "delayed-JOL effect." Psychological Science, 2, 267-270. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00147.x
35. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1992). How shall we explain the delayed-judgment-of-learning effect? Psychological Science, 3, 317-318. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00681.x
36. Nelson, T. O., McSpadden, M., Fromme, K., & Marlatt, G. T. (1986). Effects of alcohol intoxication on metamemory and on retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 247-254. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.3.247
37. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1-25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Nelson, T. O., Narens, L., & Dunlosky, J. (2004). A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Prejudgment recall and monitoring (PRAM). Psychological Methods, 9, 53-69. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.53
39. Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns [Monograph]. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(1, Pt. 2), 1-25. doi:10.1037/h0025327
40. Pollack, I. (1959). On indices of signal and response discriminability. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 31, 1031. doi:10.1121/1.1907802
41. Ratcliff, R., McKoon, G., & Tindall, M. (1994). Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 763-785. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.763
42. Robinson, J. A., & Kulp, R. A. (1970). Knowledge of prior recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 84-86. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80012-3
43. Rosner, B. S., & Kochanski, G. (2009). The law of categorical judgment (corrected) and the interpretation of changes in psychophysical performance. Psychological Review, 116, 116-128. doi:10.1037/a0014463
44. Rotello, C. M., Masson, M. E. J., & Verde, M. F. (2008). Type I error rates and power analyses for single-point sensitivity measures. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 389-401. doi:10.3758/PP.70.2.389
45. Schunn, C. D., Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Richards, D. R., & Stroffolino, P. J. (1997). To calculate or not to calculate: A source activation confusion model of problem familiarity's role in strategy selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 3-29. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.1.3
46. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
47. Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1986). Metamemory and memory: A study of the feeling-of-knowing phenomenon in amnesic patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 452-460. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.12.3.452
48. Sikström, S., & Jönsson, F. (2005). A model for stochastic drift in memory strength to account for judgments of learning. Psychological Review, 112, 932-950. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.932
49. Spellman, B. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). When predictions create reality: Judgments of learning may alter what they are intended to assess. Psychological Science, 3, 315-316. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00680.x
50. Swets, J. A. (1986a). Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: Implications for theory and measurement of performance. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 181-198. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.2.181
51. Swets, J. A. (1986b). Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: Their ROCs and implied models. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 100-117. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.100
52. Treisman, M., & Faulkner, A. (1985). Can decision criteria interchange locations? Some positive evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 187-208. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.11.2.187
53. Tulving, E. (1981). Similarity relations in recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 479-496. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90129-8
54. Van Zandt, T. (2000). ROC curves and confidence judgments in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 582-600. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.582
55. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & Iverson, G. J. (2004). Assessing model mimicry using the parametric bootstrap. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 48, 28-50. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2003.11.004
56. Wallsten, T. W., & González-Vallejo, C. (1994). Statement verification: A stochastic model of judgment and response. Psychological Review, 101, 490-504. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.490