A genome-wide survey of copy number variation regions in various chicken breeds by array comparative genomic hybridization method

Animal Genetics

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 282-289

  Wang, Y ^a   Gu, X ^a   Feng, C ^a   Song, C ^a   Hu, X ^a   Li, N ^a  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

array comparative genomic hybridization; copy number variation; domestic chicken breeds.

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; CHICKEN; CHINA; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DNA MICROARRAY; GENETICS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; CHINA; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 84859753442     PISSN: 02689146     EISSN: 13652052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02308.x     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Bae J.S., Cheong H.S., Kim L.H., NamGung S., Park T.J., Chun J.Y., Kim J.Y., Pasaje C.F., Lee J.S., &, Shin H.D., (2010) Identification of copy number variations and common deletion polymorphisms in cattle. BMC Genomics 11, 232.
2. Baumbusch L.O., Aaroe J., Johansen F.E., et al,. (2008) Comparison of the Agilent, ROMA/NimbleGen and Illumina platforms for classification of copy number alterations in human breast tumors. BMC Genomics 9, 379.
3. Conrad D.F., Pinto D., Redon R., et al,. (2010) Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome. Nature 464, 704-12.
4. Dawson P.A., Pirlo K.J., Steane S.E., Kunzelmann K., Chien Y.J., &, Markovich D., (2006) Molecular cloning and characterization of the mouse Na+ sulfate cotransporter gene (Slc13a4): structure and expression. Genes and Genetic Systems 81, 265-72.
5. de Cid R., Riveira-Munoz E., Zeeuwen P.L., et al,. (2009) Deletion of the late cornified envelope LCE3B and LCE3C genes as a susceptibility factor for psoriasis. Nature Genetics 41, 211-5.
6. de Smith A.J., Tsalenko A., Sampas N., et al,. (2007) Array CGH analysis of copy number variation identifies 1284 new genes variant in healthy white males: implications for association studies of complex diseases. Human Molecular Genetics 16, 2783-94.
7. Du Z., Zhou X., Ling Y., Zhang Z., &, Su Z., (2010) agrigo: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Research 38, W64-70.
8. Elferink M.G., Vallee A.A., Jungerius A.P., Crooijmans R.P., &, Groenen M.A., (2008) Partial duplication of the PRLR and SPEF2 genes at the late feathering locus in chicken. BMC Genomics 9, 391.
9. Fadista J., Thomsen B., Holm L.E., &, Bendixen C., (2010) Copy number variation in the bovine genome. BMC Genomics 11, 284.
10. Fontanesi L., Beretti F., Martelli P.L., Colombo M., Dall'olio S., Occidente M., Portolano B., Casadio R., Matassino D., &, Russo V., (2011) A first comparative map of copy number variations in the sheep genome. Genomics 97, 158-65.
11. Fu D., Brophy J.A., Chan C.T., Atmore K.A., Begley U., Paules R.S., Dedon P.C., Begley T.J., &, Samson L.D., (2010) Human AlkB homolog ABH8: is a tRNA methyltransferase required for wobble uridine modification and DNA damage survival. Molecular and Cellular Biology 30, 2449-59.
12. Girard J.P., Baekkevold E.S., Feliu J., Brandtzaeg P., &, Amalric F., (1999) Molecular cloning and functional analysis of SUT-1, a sulfate transporter from human high endothelial venules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96, 12772-7.
13. Greshock J., Feng B., Nogueira C., Ivanova E., Perna I., Nathanson K., Protopopov A., Weber B.L., &, Chin L., (2007) A comparison of DNA copy number profiling platforms. Cancer Research 67, 10173-80.
14. Griffin D.K., Robertson L.B., Tempest H.G., et al,. (2008) Whole genome comparative studies between chicken and turkey and their implications for avian genome evolution. BMC Genomics 9, 168.
15. Hastings P.J., Lupski J.R., Rosenberg S.M., &, Ira G., (2009) Mechanisms of change in gene copy number. Nature Reviews. Genetics 10, 551-64.
16. Hou Y., Liu G.E., Bickhart D.M., et al,. (2011) Genomic characteristics of cattle copy number variations. BMC Genomics 12, 127.
17. Iafrate A.J., Feuk L., Rivera M.N., Listewnik M.L., Donahoe P.K., Qi Y., Scherer S.W., &, Lee C., (2004) Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nature Genetics 36, 949-51.
18. Kim P.M., Lam H.Y., Urban A.E., Korbel J.O., Affourtit J., Grubert F., Chen X., Weissman S., Snyder M., &, Gerstein M.B., (2008) Analysis of copy number variants and segmental duplications in the human genome: evidence for a change in the process of formation in recent evolutionary history. Genome Research 18, 1865-74.
19. Lipson D., Aumann Y., Ben-Dor A., Linial N., &, Yakhini Z., (2006) Efficient calculation of interval scores for DNA copy number data analysis. Journal of Computational Biology 13, 215-28.
20. Liu G.E., Hou Y., Zhu B., et al,. (2010) Analysis of copy number variations among diverse cattle breeds. Genome Research 20, 693-703.
21. Lupski J.R., &, Stankiewicz P., (2005) Genomic disorders: molecular mechanisms for rearrangements and conveyed phenotypes. PLoS Genetics 1, e49.
22. Markovich D., &, Murer H., (2004) The SLC13 gene family of sodium sulphate/carboxylate cotransporters. Pflugers Archiv. European Journal of Physiology 447, 594-602.
23. McCarroll S.A., Huett A., Kuballa P., et al,. (2008) Deletion polymorphism upstream of IRGM associated with altered IRGM expression and Crohn's disease. Nature Genetics 40, 1107-12.
24. Pinto D., Darvishi K., Shi X., et al,. (2011) Comprehensive assessment of array-based platforms and calling algorithms for detection of copy number variants. Nature Biotechnology 29, 512-20.
25. Ramayo-Caldas Y., Castello A., Pena R.N., Alves E., Mercade A., Souza C.A., Fernandez A.I., Perez-Enciso M., &, Folch J.M., (2010) Copy number variation in the porcine genome inferred from a 60 k SNP BeadChip. BMC Genomics 11, 593.
26. Redon R., Ishikawa S., Fitch K.R., et al,. (2006) Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 444, 444-54.
27. Rubin C.J., Zody M.C., Eriksson J., et al,. (2010) Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature 464, 587-91.
28. Sebat J., Lakshmi B., Troge J., et al,. (2004) Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome. Science 305, 525-8.
29. Skinner B.M., Robertson L.B., Tempest H.G., Langley E.J., Ioannou D., Fowler K.E., Crooijmans R.P., Hall A.D., Griffin D.K., &, Volker M., (2009) Comparative genomics in chicken and Peking duck using FISH mapping and microarray analysis. BMC Genomics 10, 357.
30. Volker M., Backstrom N., Skinner B.M., Langley E.J., Bunzey S.K., Ellegren H., &, Griffin D.K., (2010) Copy number variation, chromosome rearrangement, and their association with recombination during avian evolution. Genome Research 20, 503-11.
31. Wang X., Nahashon S., Feaster T.K., Bohannon-Stewart A., &, Adefope N., (2010) An initial map of chromosomal segmental copy number variations in the chicken. BMC Genomics 11, 351.
32. Wright D., Boije H., Meadows J.R., et al,. (2009) Copy number variation in intron 1 of SOX5 causes the pea-comb phenotype in chickens. PLoS Genet 5, e1000512.
33. Yang T.L., Chen X.D., Guo Y., Lei S.F., et al,. (2008) Genome-wide copy-number-variation study identified a susceptibility gene, UGT2B17, for osteoporosis. American Journal of Human Genetics 83, 663-74.