Comparison of the Agilent, ROMA/NimbleGen and Illumina platforms for classification of copy number alterations in human breast tumors

BMC Genomics

Volumn 9, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Baumbusch, Lars O ^a,b   Aarøe, Jorgen ^a,b   Johansen, Fredrik Ekeberg ^a   Hicks, J ^c   Sun, Hailing ^d   Bruhn, Laurakay ^d   Gunderson, K ^e   Naume, Bjorn ^a   Kristensen, Vessela N ^a,b   Liestøl, Knut ^b   Borresen Dale A L ^a,b   Lingjærde, Ole C ^b  

^a OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c Howard Hughes Medical Institute Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cold Spring Harbor   (United States)

^d AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

^e ILLUMINA INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE DELETION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE NUMBER; GENE PROBE; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNET; ALGORITHM; BREAST TUMOR; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GENE DOSAGE; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; GENOME; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE PROBE; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATABASES, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; MALE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE PROBES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 52249106010     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-379     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Albertson DG Collins C McCormick F Gray JW Chromosome aberrations in solid tumors Nat Genet 2003, 34:369-376. 10.1038/ng1215 12923544
2. van Beers EH Nederlof PM Array-CGH and breast cancer Breast Cancer Res 2006, 8:210. 1557735 16817944
3. Pinkel D Segraves R Sudar D Clark S Poole I Kowbel D et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays Nat Genet 1998, 20:207-211. 10.1038/ 2524 9771718
4. Pollack JR Perou CM Alizadeh AA Eisen MB Pergamenschikov A Williams CF et al. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays Nat Genet 1999, 23:41-46. 10.1038/14385 10471496
5. Snijders AM Nowak N Segraves R Blackwood S Brown N Conroy J et al. Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number Nat Genet 2001, 29:263-264. 10.1038/ng754 11687795
6. Solinas-Toldo S Lampel S Stilgenbauer S Nickolenko J Benner A Dohner H et al. Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: Biochips to screen for genomic imbalances Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1997, 20:399-407. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199712)20:4<399::AID-GCC12>3.0.CO;2-I 9408757
7. Barnes M Freudenberg J Thompson S Aronow B Pavlidis P Experimental comparison and cross-validation of the Affymetrix and Illumina gene expression analysis platforms Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:5914-5923. 1258170 16237126 10.1093/nar/gki890
8. Shi L Reid LH Jones WD Shippy R Warrington JA Baker SC et al. The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements Nat Biotechnol 2006, 24:1151-1161. 10.1038/nbt1239 16964229
9. Shippy R Sendera TJ Lockner R Palaniappan C Kaysser-Kranich T Watts G et al. Performance evaluation of commercial short-oligonucleotide microarrays and the impact of noise in making cross-platform correlations BMC Genomics 2004, 5:61. 517929 15345031 10.1186/ 1471-2164-5-61
10. Tan PK Downey TJ Spitznagel EL Jr Xu P Fu D Dimitrov DS et al. Evaluation of gene expression measurements from commercial microarray platforms Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:5676-5684. 206463 14500831 10.1093/ nar/gkg763
11. Naume B Zhao X Synnestvedt M Borgen E Russnes EG Lingjærde OC et al. Presence of bone marrow micrometastasis is associated with different recurrence risk within molecular subtypes of breast cancer Molecular Oncology 2007, 1:160-171. 10.1016/j.molonc.2007.03.004
12. Sørlie T Wang Y Xiao C Johnsen H Naume B Samaha RR et al. Distinct molecular mechanisms underlying clinically relevant subtypes of breast cancer: Gene expression analyses across three different platforms BMC Genomics 2006, 7:127. 1489944 16729877 10.1186/1471-2164-7-127
13. Lingjærde OC Baumbusch LO Liestøl K Glad IK Børresen-Dale AL CGH-Explorer: A program for analysis of array-CGH data Bioinformatics 2005, 21:821-822. 10.1093/bioinformatics/ bti113 15531610
14. Bergamaschi A Kim YH Wang P Sørlie T Hernandez-Boussard T Lønning PE et al. Distinct patterns of DNA copy number alteration are associated with different clinicopathological features and gene-expression subtypes of breast cancer Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2006, 45:1033-1040. 10.1002/gcc.20366 16897746
15. Naylor TL Greshock J Wang Y Colligon T Yu QC Clemmer V et al. High resolution genomic analysis of sporadic breast cancer using array-based comparative genomic hybridization Breast Cancer Res 2005, 7:R1186-R1198. 1410746 16457699 10.1186/bcr1356
16. Richard F Pacyna-Gengelbach M uns K Fleige B Winzer KJ Szymas J et al.Patterns of chromosomal imbalances in invasive breast cancer Int J Cancer 2000, 89:305-310. 10.1002/ 1097-0215(20000520)89:3<305::AID-IJC15>3.0.CO;2-8 10861509
17. Greshock J Feng B Nogueira C Ivanova E Perna I Nathanson K et al. A comparison of DNA copy number profiling platforms Cancer Res 2007, 67:10173-10180. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2102 17968032
18. Sørlie T Perou CM Tibshirani R Aas T Geisler S Johnsen H et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:10869-10874. 58566 11553815 10.1073/pnas.191367098
19. Lengauer C Kinzler KW Vogelstein B Genetic instabilities in human cancers Nature 1998, 396:643-649. 10.1038/25292 9872311
20. Lucito R Healy J Alexander J Reiner A Esposito D Chi M et al. Representational oligonucleotide microarray analysis: A high-resolution method to detect genome copy number variation Genome Res 2003, 13:2291-2305. 403708 12975311 10.1101/gr.1349003
21. Peiffer DA Le JM Steemers FJ Chang W Jenniges T Garcia F et al. High-resolution genomic profiling of chromosomal aberrations using Infinium whole-genome genotyping Genome Res 2006, 16:1136-1148. 1557768 16899659 10.1101/gr.5402306
22. Coe BP Ylstra B Carvalho B Meijer GA Macaulay C Lam WL Resolving the resolution of array CGH Genomics 2007, 89:647-653. 10.1016/ j.ygeno.2006.12.012 17276656
23. Hehir-Kwa JY Egmont-Petersen M Janssen IM Smeets D van Kessel AG Veltman JA Genome-wide copy number profiling on high-density bacterial artificial chromosomes, single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and oligonucleotide microarrays: A platform comparison based on statistical power analysis DNA Res 2007, 14:1-11. 10.1093/dnares/dsm002 17363414
24. Gunderson KL Kruglyak S Graige MS Garcia F Kermani BG Zhao C et al. Decoding randomly ordered DNA arrays Genome Res 2004, 14:870-877. 479114 15078854 10.1101/gr.2255804
25. Gunderson KL Steemers FJ Lee G Mendoza LG Chee MS A genome-wide scalable SNP genotyping assay using microarray technology Nat Genet 2005, 37:549-554. 10.1038/ng1547 15838508
26. Lai WR Johnson MD Kucherlapati R Park PJ Comparative analysis of algorithms for identifying amplifications and deletions in array CGH data Bioinformatics 2005, 21:3763-3770. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti611 16081473
27. Lipson D Aumann Y Ben-Dor A Linial N Yakhini Z Efficient calculation of interval scores for DNA copy number data analysis J Comput Biol 2006, 13:215-228. 10.1089/cmb.2006.13.215 16597236
28. Wiedswang G Borgen E Kåresen R Kvalheim G Nesland JM Qvist H et al. Detection of isolated tumor cells in bone marrow is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer J Clin Oncol 2003, 21:3469-3478. 10.1200/JCO.2003.02.009 12972522
29. Barrett MT Scheffer A Ben Dor A Sampas N Lipson D Kincaid R et al. Comparative genomic hybridization using oligonucleotide microarrays and total genomic DNA Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:17765-17770. 535426 15591353 10.1073/pnas.0407979101
30. Hicks J Krasnitz A Lakshmi B Navin NE Riggs M Leibu E et al. Novel patterns of genome rearrangement and their association with survival in breast cancer Genome Res 2006, 16:1465-1479. 1665631 17142309 10.1101/ gr.5460106
31. Winkler G Liebscher V Smoothers for discontinous signals J Nonpar Stat 2002, 14:203-222. 10.1080/10485250211388