A Bayesian approach to targeted experiment design

Bioinformatics

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1136-1142

  Vanlier, J ^a,b   Tiemann, C A ^a,b   Hilbers, P A J ^a,b   van Riel, N A W ^a,b  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

JANUS KINASE; STAT PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; JANUS KINASES; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; RESEARCH DESIGN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STAT TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84859739489     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts092     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Brännmark, C. et al. (2010) Mass and information feedbacks through receptor endocytosis govern insulin signaling as revealed using a parameter-free modeling framework. J. Biol. Chem., 285, 20171.
2. Brown, K.S. and Sethna, J.P. (2003) Statistical mechanical approaches to models with many poorly known parameters. Phys. Rev. E, 68, 021904.
3. Calderhead, B. and Girolami, M. (2011) Statistical analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems using differential geometric sampling methods. J. R. Soc. Interface Focus, 1, 821-835.
4. Casey, F. et al. (2007) Optimal experimental design in an epidermal growth factor receptor signalling and down-regulation model. Syst. Biol. IET, 1, 190-202.
5. Cedersund, G. and Roll, J. (2009) Systems biology: model based evaluation and comparison of potential explanations for given biological data. FEBS J., 276, 903-922.
6. Cowles, M. and Carlin, B. (1996) Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: a comparative review. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 91, 883-904.
7. Del Moral, P. et al. (2006) Sequential monte carlo samplers. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, 68, 411-436.
8. Faller, D. et al. (2003) Simulation methods for optimal experimental design in systems biology. Simulation, 79, 717.
9. Geyer, C. (1992) Practical markov chain monte carlo. Stat. Sci., 7, 473-483.
10. Girolami, M. and Calderhead, B. (2011) Riemann manifold Langevin and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, 73, 123-214.
11. Gomez-Cabrero, D. et al. (2011) Workflow for generating competing hypothesis from models with parameter uncertainty. J. R. Soc. Interface Focus, 1, 438.
12. Gutenkunst, R.N. et al. (2007) Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models. PLoS Comput. Biol., 3, e189.
13. Hasenauer, J. et al. (2010) Parameter identification, experimental design and model falsification for biological network models using semidefinite programming. Syst. Biol. IET, 4, 119-130.
14. Hoops, S. et al. (2006) Copasia complex pathway simulator. Bioinformatics, 22, 3067.
15. Klinke, D. (2009)An empirical Bayesian approach for model-based inference of cellular signaling networks. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 371.
16. Kreutz, C. and Timmer, J. (2009) Systems biology: experimental design. FEBS J., 276, 923-942.
17. Kreutz, C. et al. (2007) An error model for protein quantification. Bioinformatics, 23, 2747.
18. Kreutz, C. et al. (2011) Likelihood based observability analysis and confidence intervals for predictions of dynamic models. Arxiv preprint arXiv:1107.0013.
19. Liepe, J. et al. (2010) ABC-SysBio approximate Bayesian computation in Python with GPU support. Bioinformatics, 26, 1797.
20. Maiwald, T. and Timmer, J. (2008) Dynamical modeling and multi-experiment fitting with potterswheel. Bioinformatics, 24, 2037-2043.
21. Neal, R. (1996) Sampling from multimodal distributions using tempered transitions. Stat. Comput., 6, 353-366.
22. Raue, A. et al. (2009) Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood. Bioinformatics, 25, 1923.
23. Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. et al. (2006) A hybrid approach for efficient and robust parameter estimation in biochemical pathways. Biosystems, 83, 248-265.
24. Skanda, D. and Lebiedz, D. (2010) An optimal experimental design approach to model discrimination in dynamic biochemical systems. Bioinformatics, 26, 939.
25. Swameye, I. et al. (2003) Identification of nucleocytoplasmic cycling as a remote sensor in cellular signaling by databased modeling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 100, 1028.
26. Tiemann, C. et al. (2011) Parameter adaptations during phenotype transitions in progressive diseases. BMC Syst. Biol., 5, 174.
27. Toni, T. et al. (2009) Approximate bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems. J. Roy. Soc. Interface, 6, 187-202.