Does personal intelligence exist? Evidence from a new ability-based measure

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 124-140

  Mayer, John D ^a   Panter, A T ^b   Caruso, David R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^b University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EMOTION; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST;

EMOTIONS; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TESTS;

EID: 84859714556     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2011.646108     Document Type: Article

References (117)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1963). Computer simulations of "hot cognition." In S. S. Tompkins&S.Messick (Eds.), Computer simulations of personality (pp. 277-302). New York, NY: Wiley.
2. Ames, D. R., Rose, P., & Anderson, C. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 440-450. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.002
3. Appelbaum, S. A. (1973). Psychological-mindedness: Word, concept and essence. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 54(1), 35-46.
4. Armstrong, K. (2006). The great transformation. New York, NY: Knopf.
5. Austin, E. J., & Saklofske, D. H. (2005). Far too many intelligences? On the communalities and differences between social, practical, and emotional intelligences. In R. D. Roberts (Ed.), Emotional intelligence: An international handbook (pp. 107-128). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber.
6. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The "Reading the mind in the eyes" Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241-251. doi:10.1111/1469- 7610.00715
7. Baumeister, R. F.,&Tice, D. M. (1996). Rethinking and reclaiming the interdisciplinary role of personality psychology: The science of human nature should be the center of the social sciences and humanities. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 363-373. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1996.0025
8. Boomsma, A. (2000). Reporting analyses of covariance structures. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 461-483.
9. Boomsma, A., Hoyle, R., & Panter, A. T. (in press). The structural equation modeling research report. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
10. Bornholt, L. J. (2005). Aspects of self-knowledge about activities: An integrated model of self-concepts. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 156-164. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.21.3.156
11. Bornstein, M. H., & Haynes, O. M. (1998). Vocabulary competence in early childhood: Measurement, latent construct, and predictive validity. Child Development, 69(3), 654-671. doi:10.2307/1132196
12. Brackett, M. A.,&Mayer, J.D. (2003).Convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of competing measures of emotional intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1147-1158. doi:10.1177/ 0146167203254596
13. Brackett, M. A., & Mayer, J. D. (2007). The life space: A framework and method to describe the individual's external traits. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 26(1-2), 3-41. doi:10.2190/8380-1676-H338-N217
14. Breaugh, J. A. (2009). The use of biodata for employee selection: Past research and future directions. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 219-231. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.02.003
15. Buhrmester, D., Furman, W., Wittenberg, M. T., & Reis, H. T. (1988). Five domains of interpersonal competence in peer relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 991-1008. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.6. 991
16. Buss, D. M. (2008). Human nature and individual differences: Evolution of human personality. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality psychology: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 29-60). New York, NY: Guilford.
17. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
18. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
19. Clausen, J. S. (1991). Adolescent competence and the shaping of the life course. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 805-842. doi:10.1086/229609
20. Conte, H. R., Plutchik, R., Jung, B. B., & Picard, S. (1990). Psychological mindedness as a predictor of psychotherapy outcome: A preliminary report. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 31, 426-431. doi:10.1016/0010-440X(90) 90027-P
21. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
22. Csikszentimihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
23. Cunningham, C. A. (2005). A certain and reasoned art: The rise and fall of character education in America. In F. C. Power (Ed.), Character psychology and character education (pp. 166-200). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
24. Dhammapada. (1994). Dhammapada: The sayings of Buddha (T.Cleary Trans.). New York, NY: Bantam. (Original work published c. 550 BCE)
25. Diodorus. (1960). Diodurus of Sicily. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1935)
26. Dunning, D. (2005). Self-insight:Roadblocks and detours on the path to knowing thyself. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
27. Emmons, R. A., & King, L. A. (1988). Conflict among personal strivings: Immediate and long-term implications for psychological and physical well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1040-1048. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1040
28. Fiedler, K., Freytag, P., & Meiser, T. (2009). Pseudocontingencies: An integrative account of an intriguing cognitive illusion. Psychological Review, 116(1), 187-206. doi:10.1037/a0014480
29. Ford, M. E., & Tisak, M. S. (1983). A further search for social intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 196-206. doi:10.1037/0022- 0663.75.2.196
30. Freeman, H. D., & Gosling, S. D. (2010). Personality in nonhuman primates: A review and evaluation of past research. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 653-671. doi:10.1002/ajp.20833
31. Fulmer, C. A., Gelfand, M. J., Kruglanski, A. W., Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., Pierro, A., & Higgins, E. T. (2010). On "feeling right" in cultural contexts: Howperson-culture match affects self-esteem and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 21, 1563-1569. doi:10.1177/0956797610384742
32. Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652-670. doi:10.1037/0033- 295X.102.4.652
33. Funder, D. C. (2001). Accuracy in personality judgment: Research and theory concerning an obvious question. In R. Hogan (Ed.), Personality psychology in the workplace (pp. 121-140). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10434-005
34. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
35. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26-34. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26
36. Goldberg, L. R., & Rosolack, T. K. (1994). The Big Five factor structure as an integrative framework: An empirical comparison with Eysenck's P-E-N model. In R. P. Martin (Ed.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 7-35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Goldstein, T. R., Wu, K., & Winner, E. (2009). Actors are skilled in theory of mind but not empathy. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 29, 115-133. doi:10.2190/IC.29.2.c
38. Gonzalez, C. M., Zosuls, K. M., & Ruble, D. N. (2010). Traits as dimensions or categories? Developmental change in the understanding of trait terms. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1078-1088. doi:10.1037/a0020207
39. Goodwin, L. D.,&Leech, N. L. (2003). The meaning of validity in the new standards for educational and psychological testing: Implications for measurement courses. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 36, 181-192.
40. Gosling, S. D., Ko, S. J., Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M. E. (2002). A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 379-398. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.82.3.379
41. Haigler, E. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Experimental manipulation of NEO PI-R items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77(2), 339-358. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7702 14
42. Haselton, M. G., & Funder, D. C. (2006). The evolution of accuracy and bias in social judgment. In D. T. Kenrick (Ed.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 15-37). Madison, CT: Psychosocial Press.
43. Hedlund, J., & Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Too many intelligences? Integrating social, emotional, and practical intelligence. In J. D. A. Parker (Ed.), The handbook of emotional intelligence: Theory, development, assessment, and application at home, school, and in the workplace (pp. 136-167). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
44. Heyman, G. D., & Gelman, S. A. (2000). Preschool children's use of trait labels to make inductive inferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77(1), 1-19. doi:10.1006/jecp.1999.2555
45. Holleran, S. E., Mehl, M. R., & Levitt, S. (2009). Eavesdropping on social life: The accuracy of stranger ratings of daily behavior from thin slices of natural conversations. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 660-672. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.03.017
46. Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle&R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Structural equationmodeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
48. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five inventory: Technical report. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
49. Kenrick, D. T., & Dantchik, A. (1983). Interactionism, idiographics, and the social psychology invasion of personality. Journal of Personality, 51, 286-307. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.ep7379520
50. Kenrick, D. T., & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43(1), 23-34. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.43.1.23
51. Kihlstrom, J. F., & Cantor, N. (2000). Social intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 359-379). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
52. Klein, S. B., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & Chance, S. (2002). Decisions and the evolution of memory: Multiple systems, multiple functions. Psychological Review, 109, 306-329. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.2.306
53. Kluckhohn, C., & Murray, H. A. (1953). Personality formation: The determinants. In C. Kluckhohn, H. A. Murray, & D.M. Schneider (Eds.), Personality in nature, society, and culture (pp. 53-67). New York, NY: Knopf.
54. Letzring, T. D. (2008). The good judge of personality:Characteristics, behaviors, and observer accuracy. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 914-932. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.12.003
55. Lieberman, M. D., Jarcho, J. M., & Satpute, A. B. (2004). Evidence-based and intuition-based self-knowledge: An fMRI Study. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 87, 421-435.
56. Little, A. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2007). Using composite images to assess accuracy in personality attribution to faces. British Journal of Psychology, 98(1), 111-126. doi:10.1348/000712606×109648
57. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing themerits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902 1
58. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 420-430. doi:10.1177/1745691610375557
59. Mayer, J. D. (2004). A classification system for the data of personality psychology and adjoining fields. Review of General Psychology, 8, 208-219. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.3.208
60. Mayer, J. D. (2005).Atale of two visions: Can a newviewof personality help integrate psychology? American Psychologist, 60, 294-307. doi:10.1037/0003- 066X.60.4.294
61. Mayer, J. D. (2008). Personal intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 27, 209-232. doi:10.2190/IC.27.3.b
62. Mayer, J. D. (2009). Personal intelligence expressed: A theoretical analysis. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 46-58. doi:10.1037/a0014229
63. Mayer, J. D., Carlsmith, K.M., & Chabot, H. F. (1998). Describing the person's external environment: Conceptualizing and measuring the life space. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 253-296. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1998. 2220
64. Mayer, J. D., & Caruso, D. R. (1999). Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 27, 267.
65. Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Panter, A. T. (2011a). The Personal Intelligence Life Space Inventory (PILSI 1.0). Unpublished manuscript.
66. Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Panter, A. T. (2011b). The Test of Personal Intelligence: Item booklet and scoring systems for versions 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2. Unpublished manuscript.
67. Mayer, J. D., DiPaolo, M., & Salovey, P. (1990). Perceiving affective content in ambiguous visual stimuli: A component of emotional intelligence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 772-781.
68. Mayer, J. D., Lin, S. C., & Korogodsky, M. (2011). Exploring the universality of personality judgments: Evidence from the Great Transformation (1000 BCE-200 BCE). Review of General Psychology, 15, 65-76.
69. Mayer, J. D., & Mitchell, D. C. (1998). Intelligence as a subsystem of personality: From Spearman's g to contemporary models of hot processing. In W. Tomic & J. Kingma (Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice (pp. 43-75). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
70. Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., & Barsade, S. G. (2008). Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 507-536. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093646
71. Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In D. J. Sluyter (Ed.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications (pp. 3-34). New York, NY: Basic Books.
72. Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2002a). Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Item Booklet. Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
73. Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2002b). Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) user's manual. Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
74. Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2004). Emotional Intelligence: Theory, findings, and implications. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 197-215.
75. Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2008). Emotional intelligence: New ability or eclectic traits? American Psychologist, 63, 503-517. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.6.503
76. McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204-217. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204
77. McCallum, M., & Piper, W. E. (1990). The Psychological Mindedness Assessment Procedure. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 412-418. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.2.4.412
78. McDonald, R. P., & Ahlawat, K. S. (1974). Difficulty factors in binary data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27(1), 82-99.
79. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
80. Moran, S. (2009). Purpose: Giftedness in intrapersonal intelligence. High Ability Studies, 20, 143-159. doi:10.1080/13598130903358501
81. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
82. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2007). Mplus user's guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
83. Nagel, T., Dennett, D. C., Nelson, T. O., Leonesio, R. J., Landwehr, R. S., Narens, L., . . . Knox, V. J. (1992). Privileged access and consciousness. In T. O. Nelson (Ed.), Metacognition: Core readings (pp. 27-99). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
84. Naumann, L. P., Vazire, S., Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2009). Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1661-1671. doi:10.1177/0146167209346309
85. Neisser, U. (1988). Five kinds of self-knowledge. Philosophical Psychology, 1(1), 35-59. doi:10.1080/09515088808572924
86. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 400-424. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x
87. Paulhus, D. L., Lysy, D. C., & Yik, M. S. M. (1998). Self-report measures of intelligence: Are they useful as proxy IQ tests? Journal of Personality, 66, 525-554. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00023
88. Pillemer, D. B. (1998). Momentous events, vivid memories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
89. Pillemer, D. B. (2003). Directive functions of autobiographical memory: The guiding power of the specific episode. Memory, 11, 193-202. doi:10.1080/741938208
90. Pirke avot. 1993 In l. Kravitz & k.m. Olitzky (eds.) Pirke avot: A modern commentary on Jewish ethics. New York, NY: UACH Press. (Original work published c. 200 BCE-200 CE)
91. Pucci, J., & Viard, R. P. (1995). IQ Test. Needham, MA: Virtual Entertainment.
92. Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313-345. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x
93. Robins, R. W., & John, O. P. (1997). The quest for self-insight: Theory and research on accuracy and bias in self-perception. In S. R. Briggs (Ed.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 649-679). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50026-3
94. Rosenthal, S. A., Hooley, J. M., & Steshenko, Y. (2007). Distinguishing grandiosity from self-esteem: Development of the Narcissistic Grandiosity Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
95. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 185-211.
96. Shill, M. A., & Lumley, M. A. (2002). The Psychological Mindedness Scale: Factor structure, convergent validity and gender in a non-psychiatric sample. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 75, 131-150. doi:10.1348/147608302169607
97. Smith, G. T. (2005). On construct validity: Issues of method and measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17, 396-408. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.17. 4.396
98. Smith,G.T., Fischer, S.,&Fister, S.M. (2003). Incremental validity principles in test construction. Psychological Assessment, 15, 467-477. doi:10.1037/1040- 3590.15.4.467
99. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537. doi:10.1037/h0037039
100. Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2009). Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 84-90. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.10.002
101. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
102. Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Successful intelligence: Finding a balance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 436-442. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99) 01391-1
103. Stokes, G. S. (1999). Introduction to special issue: The next one hundred years of biodata. Human Resource Management Review, 9, 111-116. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00014-5
104. Uttl, B., & Van Alstine, C. L. (2003). Rising verbal intelligence scores: Implications for research and clinical practice. Psychology and Aging, 18, 616-621. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.3.616
105. Vazire, S., & Mehl, M. R. (2008). Knowing me, knowing you: The accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other-ratings of daily behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1202-1216. doi:10.1037/a0013314
106. Vicino, F. L.,&Bass, B. M. (1978). Lifespace variables andmanagerial success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(1), 81-88. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63. 1.81
107. Vogt, D. S., & Colvin, C. R. (2005). Assessment of accurate selfknowledge. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 239-251. doi:10.1207/ s15327752jpa8403 03
108. Wagner, R. K. (2000). Practical intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 380-395). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
109. Wagner, R. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 436-458. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.2.436
110. Wechsler, D. (1997). WAIS III: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
111. Weinberger, D. A., Schwartz, G. E., & Davidson, R. J. (1979). Low-anxious, high-anxious, and repressive coping styles: Psychometric patterns and behavioral and physiological responses to stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 369-380. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.88.4.369
112. Wilson, T. D. (2009). Know thyself. Perspectives on Psychological Science (Wiley-Blackwell), 4, 384-389. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01143.x
113. Wilson, T. D., & Dunn, E. W. (2004). Self-knowledge: Its limits, value and potential for improvement. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 493-518. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141954
114. Yerkes, R. M. (1921). Psychological examining in the United States Army. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
115. Zebrowitz, L. A. (2006). Finally, faces find favor. SocialCognition, 24, 657-701. doi:10.1521/soc0.2006.24.5.657
116. Zeidner, M., Roberts, R. D., & Matthews, G. (2008). The science of emotional intelligence: Current consensus and controversies. European Psychologist, 13(1), 64-78. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.1.64
117. Zeigler-Hill, V., & Highfill, L. (2010). Applying the interpersonal circumplex to the behavioral styles of dogs and cats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 124, 104-112. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2010.02.012