The use of biodata for employee selection: Past research and future directions

Human Resource Management Review

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 219-231

  Breaugh, James A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodata; Biographical information; Employee selection; Personal history data

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649560457     PISSN: 10534822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Allworth E., and Hesketh B. Job requirements biodata as a predictor of performance in customer service roles. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 8 (2000) 137-147
2. Barrick M.R., and Zimmerman R.D. Reducing voluntary, avoidable turnover through selection. Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (2005) 159-166
3. Bartram D. Computer-based testing and the internet. In: Evers A., Anderson N., and Voskuijl O. (Eds). Handbook of personnel selection (2005), Blackwell, Malden, MA 399-418
4. Bliesener T. Methodological moderators in validating biographical data in personnel selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 69 (1996) 107-120
5. Breaugh J.A., and Dossett D.L. Rethinking the use of personal history information: The value of theory-based biodata for predicting turnover. Journal of Business and Psychology 4 (1989) 371-385
6. Brown S.H. Long-term validity of a personal history item scoring procedure. Journal of Applied Psychology 63 (1978) 673-676
7. Brown S.H. Validity generalization and situational moderation in the life insurance industry. Journal of Applied Psychology 66 (1981) 664-670
8. Carlson K.D., Scullen S.E., Schmidt F.L., Rothstein H., and Erwin F. Generalizable biographical data validity can be achieved without multi-organizational development and keying. Personnel Psychology 52 (1999) 731-755
9. Dalessio A.T., Crosby M., and McManus M.A. Stability of biodata keys and dimensions across English-speaking countries: A test of the cross-situational hypothesis. Journal of Business and Psychology 10 (1996) 289-296
10. Dean M.A. An assessment of biodata predictive ability across multiple performance criteria. Applied H.R.M. 9 (2004) 1-12
11. Dean M.A., and Russell C.J. An examination of biodata theory-based constructs in a field context. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 13 (2005) 139-149
12. England G.W. Development and use of weighted application blanks (1971), University of Minnesota, Industrial Relations Center, Minneapolis (Bulletin No. 55)
13. Evers A., Anderson N., and Voskuijl O. Handbook of personnel selection (2005), Blackwell, Malden, MA
14. Furnham A. HR professionals' beliefs about, and knowledge of, assessment techniques and psychometric tests. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 16 (2008) 300-305
15. Gatewood R.D., Feild H.S., and Barrick M. Human resource selection (2008), Thompson South-Western, Mason, Ohio
16. Goldsmith D.B. The use of the personal history blank as a salesmanship test. Journal of Applied Psychology 6 (1922) 149-155
17. Graham K.E., McDaniel M.A., Douglas E.F., and Snell A.F. Biodata validity decay and score inflation with faking: Do item attributes explain variance across items?. Journal of Business and Psychology 16 (2002) 573-592
18. Harold C.M., McFarland L.A., and Weekley J.A. The validity of verifiable and non-verifiable biodata items: An examination across applicants and incumbents. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 14 (2006) 336-346
19. Hogan J.B. Empirical keying of background data measures. In: Stokes G.A., Mumford M.D., and Owens W.A. (Eds). Biodata handbook (1994), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA 69-107
20. Hough L.M., Oswald F.L., and Ployhart R.E. Determinants, detection and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues, evidence, and lessons learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 9 (2001) 152-194
21. Hough L., and Paullin C. Construct-oriented scale construction. In: Stokes G.A., Mumford M.D., and Owens W.A. (Eds). Biodata handbook (1994), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA 109-145
22. Laurent H. Cross-cultural cross-validation of empirically validated tests. Journal of Applied Psychology 54 (1970) 417-423
23. Lautenschlager G.J. Accuracy and faking of background data. In: Stokes G.A., Mumford M.D., and Owens W.A. (Eds). Biodata handbook (1994), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA 391-419
24. Lefkowitz J., Gebbia M.I., Balsam T., and Dunn L. Dimensions of biodata items and their relationship to item validity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 72 (1999) 331-350
25. Mael F.A. A conceptual rationale for the domain and attributes of biodata items. Personnel Psychology 44 (1991) 763-792
26. McDaniel M.A., Hartman N.S., Whetzel D.L., and Grubb W.L. Situational judgment tests, response instructions, and validity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 60 (2007) 63-91
27. McFarland L.A., and Ryan A.M. Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (2000) 812-821
28. Mount M.K., Witt L.A., and Barrick M.R. Incremental validity of empirically keyed biodata scales over GMA and the five factor personality constructs. Personnel Psychology 53 (2000) 299-323
29. Mumford M.D. Construct validity and background data: Issues, abuses, and future directions. Human Resource Management Review 9 (1999) 117-145
30. Mumford M.D., and Owens W.A. Methodological review: Principles, procedures, and findings in the application of background data measures. Applied Psychological Measurement 11 (1987) 1-31
31. Mumford M.D., Reiter-Palmon R., and Snell A.F. Background data and development: Structural issues in the application of life history measures. In: Stokes G.A., Mumford M.D., and Owens W.A. (Eds). Biodata handbook (1994), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA 555-581
32. Mumford M.D., Stokes G.S., and Owens W.A. Patterns of life history: The ecology of human individuality (1990), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
33. Mumford M.D., Whetzel D.L., Murphy S.T., and Eubanks D.L. Background data. In: Whetzel D.L., and Wheaton G.R. (Eds). Applied measurement: Industrial psychology in human resource management (2007), Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, New York 201-233
34. Nickels B.J. The nature of biodata. In: Stokes G.A., Mumford M.D., and Owens W.A. (Eds). Biodata handbook (1994), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA 1-16
35. O'Connel M.S., Hattrup K., Doverspike D., and Cober A. The validity of "mini" simulations for Mexican salespeople. Journal of Business and Psychology 16 (2002) 593-599
36. Oviedo-Garcia M.A. Internal validation of a biodata extraversion scale. Social behavior and personality 35 (2007) 675-692
37. Ployhart R.E., Schneider B., and Schmitt N. Staffing organizations: Contemporary practice and theory. (3rd edition.) (2006), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
38. Ployhart R.E., Weekley J.A., Holtz B.C., and Kemp C. Web-based and paper-and-pencil testing of applicants in a proctored setting: Are personality, biodata, and situational judgment tests comparable?. Personnel Psychology 56 (2003) 733-752
39. Quiñones M.G., Ford J.K., and Teachout M.S. The relationship between work experience and job performance: A conceptual and meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology 48 (1995) 887-910
40. Roth P.L., BeVier C.A., Switzer F.S., and Schippmann J.S. Meta-analyzing the relationship between grades and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 81 (1996) 548-556
41. Rothstein H.R., Schmidt F.L., Erwin F.W., Owens W.A., and Sparks C.P. Biographical data in employment selection: Can validities be made generalizable?. Journal of Applied Psychology 75 (1990) 175-184
42. Ryan A.M., and Huth M. Not much more than platitudes? A critical look at the utility of applicant reactions research. Human Resource Management Review 18 (2008) 119-132
43. Salgado J.F., Viswesvaran C., and Ones D.S. Predictors used for personnel selection: An overview of constructs, methods, and techniques. In: Anderson N., Ones D.S., Sinangil H., and Viswesvaran C. (Eds). Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology Vol. 1 (2001), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 165-199
44. Schmidt F.L. The problem of group differences in ability test scores in employment selection. Journal of Vocational Behavior 33 (1988) 272-292
45. Schmidt F.L., and Hunter J.E. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin 124 (1998) 262-274
46. Schmitt N., Jennings D., and Toney R. Can we develop measures of hypothetical constructs?. Human Resource Management Review 9 (1999) 169-183
47. Schmitt N., and Kunce C. The effects of required elaboration of answers to biodata questions. Personnel Psychology 55 (2002) 569-587
48. Schmitt N., Oswald F.L., Kim B.K., Gillespie M.A., Ramsay L.J., and Yoo T. Impact of elaboration on socially desirable responding and the validity of biodata measures. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2005) 979-988
49. Schoenfeldt L.F. From dust bowl empiricism to rational constructs in biographical data. Human Resource Management Review 9 (1999) 147-167
50. Shaffer G.S., Saunders V., and Owens W.A. Additional evidence for the accuracy of biographical data: Long-term retest and observer effects. Personnel Psychology 39 (1986) 791-809
51. Sharf J.C. The impact of legal and equal employment opportunity issues on personal history inquiries. In: Stokes G.A., Mumford M.D., and Owens W.A. (Eds). Biodata handbook (1994), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA 351-390
52. Sisco H., and Reilly R.R. Development and validation of a Biodata Inventory as an alternative method to measurement of the five factor model of personality. The Social Science Journal 44 (2007) 383-389
53. Steinhaus S.D., and Waters B.K. Biodata and the application of a psychometric perspective. Military Psychology 3 (1991) 1-23
54. Stokes G.S. Introduction to special issue: The next one hundred years of biodata. Human Resource Management Review 9 (1999) 111-116
55. Stokes G.S., Hogan J.B., and Snell A.F. Comparability of incumbent and applicant samples for the development of biodata keys: The influence of social desirability. Personnel Psychology 46 (1993) 739-762
56. Stokes G.S., and Searcy C.A. Specification of scales in biodata form development: Rational vs. empirical and global vs. specific. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 7 (1999) 72-85
57. Van Iddekinge C.H., Eidson C.E., Kudisch J.D., and Goldblatt A.M. A biodata inventory administered via interactive voice technology (IVR) technology: Predictive validity, utility, and subgroup differences. Journal of Business and Psychology 18 (2003) 145-156
58. Vinchur A.J., Shippmann J.S., Switzer F.S., and Roth P.L. A meta-analytic review of predictors of job performance for salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (1998) 586-597