Accelerating Discovery for Complex Neurological and Behavioral Disorders Through Systems Genetics and Integrative Genomics in the Laboratory Mouse

Neurotherapeutics

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 338-348

  Bubier, Jason A ^a   Chesler, Elissa J ^a  

^a JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Data integration; genomics; Recombinant inbred mice; Systems genetics

Indexed keywords

BUNGAROTOXIN RECEPTOR; DOPAMINE 2 RECEPTOR; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR 2B; PURINERGIC P2X4 RECEPTOR; SEROTONIN TRANSPORTER; SODIUM CHANNEL NAV1.6; SODIUM CHANNEL NAV1.7; VANILLOID RECEPTOR 1;

ANXIETY; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BIOINFORMATICS; CLASSIFICATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL MOUSE; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC CORRELATION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; HAPLOTYPE; HOPELESSNESS; MOUSE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NOCICEPTION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REFERENCE DATABASE; REVIEW; STARTLE REFLEX; STRESS;

ANIMALS; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; MICE; MODELS, ANIMAL; MODELS, GENETIC; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION;

EID: 84859702330     PISSN: 19337213     EISSN: 18787479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13311-012-0111-3     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Trull TJ, Jahng S, Tomko RL, Wood PK, Sher KJ. Revised NESARC personality disorder diagnoses: gender, prevalence, and comorbidity with substance dependence disorders. J Pers Disord 2010; 24: 412-426.
2. Stinson FS, Grant BF, Dawson DA, et al. Comorbidity between DSM-IV alcohol and specific drug use disorders in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Drug Alcohol Depend 2005; 80: 105-116.
3. Ruan WJ, Goldstein RB, Chou SP, et al. The alcohol use disorder and associated disabilities interview schedule-IV (AUDADIS-IV): reliability of new psychiatric diagnostic modules and risk factors in a general population sample. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008; 92: 27-36.
4. Novak SP, Herman-Stahl M, Flannery B, Zimmerman M. Physical pain, common psychiatric and substance use disorders, and the non-medical use of prescription analgesics in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 100: 63-70.
5. Menary KR, Kushner MG, Maurer E, Thuras P. The prevalence and clinical implications of self-medication among individuals with anxiety disorders. J Anxiety Disord 2011; 25: 335-339.
6. Martins SS, Keyes KM, Storr CL, Zhu H, Chilcoat HD. Pathways between nonmedical opioid use/dependence and psychiatric disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 103: 16-24.
7. Howard MO, Perron BE, Vaughn MG, Bender KA, Garland E. Inhalant use, inhalant-use disorders, and antisocial behavior: findings from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2010; 71: 201-209. d.
8. Goodwin RD, Zvolensky MJ, Keyes KM. Nicotine dependence and mental disorders among adults in the USA: evaluating the role of the mode of administration. Psychol Med 2008; 38: 1277-1286.
9. Dawson DA, Grant BF, Ruan WJ. The association between stress and drinking: modifying effects of gender and vulnerability. Alcohol Alcohol 2005; 40: 453-460.
10. Bolton JM, Robinson J, Sareen J. Self-medication of mood disorders with alcohol and drugs in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J Affect Disord 2009; 115: 367-375.
11. Conway KP, Compton W, Stinson FS, Grant BF. Lifetime comorbidity of DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders and specific drug use disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J Clin Psychiatry 2006; 67: 247-257.
12. Aylor DL, Valdar W, Foulds-Mathes W, et al. Genetic analysis of complex traits in the emerging Collaborative Cross. Genome Res 2011; 21: 1213-1222.
13. Chesler EJ, Miller DR, Branstetter LR, et al. The Collaborative Cross at Oak Ridge National Laboratory: developing a powerful resource for systems genetics. Mamm Genome 2008; 19: 382-389.
14. Philip VM, Sokoloff G, Ackert-Bicknell CL, et al. Genetic analysis in the Collaborative Cross breeding population. 2011; 21: 1223-1238.
15. Baker EJ, Jay JJ, Bubier JA, Langston MA, Chesler EJ. GeneWeaver: a web-based system for integrative functional genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40: D1067-D1076.
16. Baker EJ, Jay JJ, Philip VM, et al. Ontological discovery environment: a system for integrating gene-phenotype associations. Genomics 2009; 94: 377-387.
17. Milner LC, Buck KJ. Identifying quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and genes (QTGs) for alcohol-related phenotypes in mice. Int Rev Neurobiol 2010; 91: 173-204.
18. Eppig JT, Blake JA, Bult CJ, Kadin JA, Richardson JE. The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): comprehensive resource for genetics and genomics of the laboratory mouse. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40: D881-D886.
19. Gora-Maslak G, McClearn GE, Crabbe JC, et al. Use of recombinant inbred strains to identify quantitative trait loci in psychopharmacology. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1991; 104: 413-424.
20. Chesler EJ, Lu L, Wang J, Williams RW, Manly KF. WebQTL: rapid exploratory analysis of gene expression and genetic networks for brain and behavior. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 485-486.
21. Peirce JL, Lu L, Gu J, Silver LM, Williams RW. A new set of BXD recombinant inbred lines from advanced intercross populations in mice. BMC Genet 2004; 5: 7.
22. Philip VM, Duvvuru S, Gomero B, et al. High-throughput behavioral phenotyping in the expanded panel of BXD recombinant inbred strains. Genes Brain Behav 2010; 9: 129-159.
23. Chesler EJ, Wang J, Lu L, et al. Genetic correlates of gene expression in recombinant inbred strains: a relational model system to explore neurobehavioral phenotypes. Neuroinformatics 2003; 1: 343-357.
24. Manly KF, Cudmore RH Jr., Meer JM. Map Manager QTX, cross-platform software for genetic mapping. Mamm Genome 2001; 12: 930-932.
25. Ayer L, Rettew D, Althoff RR, et al. Adolescent personality profiles, neighborhood income, and young adult alcohol use: a longitudinal study. Addict Behav 2011; 36: 1301-1304.
26. Hovatta I, Zapala MA, Broide RS, et al. DNA variation and brain region-specific expression profiles exhibit different relationships between inbred mouse strains: implications for eQTL mapping studies. Genome Biol 2007; 8: R25.
27. Lum PY, Chen Y, Zhu J, et al. Elucidating the murine brain transcriptional network in a segregating mouse population to identify core functional modules for obesity and diabetes. J Neurochem 2006;(97 suppl 1): 50-62.
28. Park CC, Gale GD, de Jong S, et al. Gene networks associated with conditional fear in mice identified using a systems genetics approach. BMC Syst Biol 2011; 5: 43.
29. Hill AE, Lander ES, Nadeau JH. Chromosome substitution strains: a new way to study genetically complex traits. Methods Mol Med 2006; 128: 153-172.
30. Bryant CD, Chang HP, Zhang J, et al. A major QTL on chromosome 11 influences psychostimulant and opioid sensitivity in mice. Genes Brain Behav 2009; 8: 795-805.
31. Matthews DB, Chesler EJ, Cook MN, et al. Genetic mapping of vocalization to a series of increasing acute footshocks using B6. A consomic and B6. D2 congenic mouse strains. Behav Genet 2008; 38: 417-423.
32. Darvasi A, Soller M. Advanced intercross lines, an experimental population for fine genetic mapping. Genetics 1995; 141: 1199-1207.
33. Shifman S, Darvasi A. Mouse inbred strain sequence information and yin-yang crosses for quantitative trait locus fine mapping. Genetics 2005; 169: 849-854.
34. Eisener-Dorman AF, Grabowski-Boase L, Steffy BM, Wiltshire T, Tarantino LM. Quantitative trait locus and haplotype mapping in closely related inbred strains identifies a locus for open field behavior. Mamm Genome 2010; 21: 231-246.
35. Roberts A, Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Wang W, McMillan L, Threadgill DW. The polymorphism architecture of mouse genetic resources elucidated using genome-wide resequencing data: implications for QTL discovery and systems genetics. Mamm Genome 2007; 18: 473-481.
36. Johannesson M, Lopez-Aumatell R, Stridh P, et al. A resource for the simultaneous high-resolution mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci in rats: the NIH heterogeneous stock. Genome Res 2009; 19: 150-158.
37. McClearn GE, Wilson JR, Petersen DR, Allen DL. Selective breeding in mice for severity of the ethanol withdrawal syndrome. Subst Alcohol Actions Misuse 1982; 3: 135-143.
38. Churchill GA, Airey DC, Allayee H, et al. The Collaborative Cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits. Nat Genet 2004; 36: 1133-1137.
39. Iancu OD, Darakjian P, Walter NA, et al. Genetic diversity and striatal gene networks: focus on the heterogeneous stock-collaborative cross (HS-CC) mouse. BMC Genomics 2010; 11: 585.
40. Svenson KL, Gatti DM, Valdar W, et al. The Mouse Diversity Outbred Population. Genetics 2012; 190: 437-447.
41. Mozhui K, Hamre KM, Holmes A, Lu L, Williams RW. Genetic and structural analysis of the basolateral amygdala complex in BXD recombinant inbred mice. Behav Genet 2007; 37: 223-243.
42. Ishimori N, Li R, Walsh KA, et al. Quantitative trait loci that determine BMD in C57BL/6J and 129S1/SvImJ inbred mice. J Bone Miner Res 2006; 21: 105-112.
43. Chesler EJ, Lu L, Shou S, et al. Complex trait analysis of gene expression uncovers polygenic and pleiotropic networks that modulate nervous system function. Nat Genet 2005; 37: 233-242.
44. Ceusters W, Smith B. A unified framework for biomedical terminologies and ontologies. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 160(pt 2): 1050-1054.
45. The Gene Ontology: Enhancements for 2011. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40: D559-D564.
46. Schriml LM, Arze C, Nadendla S, et al. Disease Ontology: A backbone for disease semantic integration. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40: D940-D946.
47. Smith CL, Eppig JT. The mammalian phenotype ontology: enabling robust annotation and comparative analysis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 2009; 1: 390-399.
48. Zhang W, Zhang Y, Zheng H, et al. SynDB: a Synapse protein DataBase based on synapse ontology. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35(database issue): D737-D741.
49. Guo AY, Webb BT, Miles MF, et al. ERGR: An ethanol-related gene resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37(database issue): D840-D845.
50. Li CY, Mao X, Wei L. Genes and (common) pathways underlying drug addiction. PLoS Comput Biol 2008; 4: e2.
51. Lacroix-Fralish ML, Ledoux JB, Mogil JS. The Pain Genes Database: An interactive web browser of pain-related transgenic knockout studies. Pain 2007; 131: e1-e4.
52. Gardner D, Akil H, Ascoli GA, et al. The neuroscience information framework: a data and knowledge environment for neuroscience. Neuroinformatics 2008; 6: 149-160.
53. Wang J, Williams RW, Manly KF. WebQTL: web-based complex trait analysis. Neuroinformatics 2003; 1: 299-308.
54. Davis AP, King BL, Mockus S, et al. The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database: update 2011. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 39(database issue): D1067-D1072.
55. Lein ES, Hawrylycz MJ, Ao N, et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature 2007; 445: 168-176.
56. Neely GG, Hess A, Costigan M, et al. A genome-wide Drosophila screen for heat nociception identifies alpha2delta3 as an evolutionarily conserved pain gene. Cell 2010; 143: 628-638.
57. LaCroix-Fralish ML, Austin JS, Zheng FY, Levitin DJ, Mogil JS. Patterns of pain: meta-analysis of microarray studies of pain. Pain 2011; 152: 1888-1898.
58. Patel SD, Le-Niculescu H, Koller DL, et al. Coming to grips with complex disorders: genetic risk prediction in bipolar disorder using panels of genes identified through convergent functional genomics. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2010; 153B: 850-877.
59. McGary KL, Park TJ, Woods JO, et al. Systematic discovery of nonobvious human disease models through orthologous phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107: 6544-6549.
60. Meehan TF, Carr CJ, Jay JJ, et al. Autism candidate genes via mouse phenomics. J Biomed Inform 2011; 44: S5-S11.
61. Nissenbaum J, Devor M, Seltzer Z, et al. Susceptibility to chronic pain following nerve injury is genetically affected by CACNG2. Genome Res 2010; 20: 1180-1190.