In Pursuit of Reciprocity: Researchers, Teachers, and School Reformers Engaged in Collaborative Analysis of Video Records

Theory into Practice

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 91-98

  Curry, Marnie W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859652075     PISSN: 00405841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00405841.2012.662858     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Birch, M. and Miller, T. 2002. "Encouraging participation: Ethics and responsibility.". In Ethics in qualitative research Edited by: Mauthner, M., Birch, M., Jessop, J. and Miller, T. 91-106. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Curry, M. W. 2003. Critical friends: A case study of teachers' professional community in a reforming high school, Ph.D. dissertation United States-California: University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved May 25, 2011 from Dissertations & Theses @ University of California (Publication No. AAT 3105191)
3. Edwards, R. and Mauthner, M. 2002. "Ethics and feminist research: Theory and practice.". In Ethics in qualitative research Edited by: Mauthner, M., Birch, M., Jessop, J. and Miller, T. 14-31. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
4. Grumet, M. R. 1987. The politics of personal knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 17: 319-329.
5. Gore, J. M. and Gitlin, A. D. 2004. [Re]Visioning the academic-teacher divide: Power and knowledge in the educational community. Teachers and Teaching, 10(1): 35-58.
6. Hall, E. T. 1963. A system for the notation of proxemic behaviour. American Anthropologist, 65: 1003-1026.
7. Hall, R. 2000. "Video recording as theory.". In Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education Edited by: Kelly, A. E. and Lesh, R. A. 647-664. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Harrison, J., MacGibbon, L. and Morton, M. 2001. Regimes of trustworthiness in qualitative research: The rigors of reciprocity. Qualitative Inquiry, 7: 323-345.
9. King, S., Louth, C. and Wasley, P. Roses, retrievers and research: Collaborative inquiry to foster better schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April12-161993, Atlanta, GA.
10. Lather, P. 1986. Research as praxis. Harvard Education Review, 56: 257-277.
11. Lincoln, L. S. 1995. Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1: 275-289.
12. Little, J. W. 2002. Locating learning in teachers' communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18: 917-946.
13. Little, J. W., Gearhart, M., Curry, M. and Kafka, J. 2003. "Looking at student work" for teacher learning and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(3): 184-192.
14. Mauthner, M., Birch, M., Jessop, J. and Miller, T. 2002. Ethics in qualitative research Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Reinharz, S. 1979. On becoming a social scientist San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16. Reinharz, S. 1993. Neglected voices and excessive demands in feminist research. Qualitative Sociology, 16: 69-76.
17. Trainor, A. and Bouchard, K. A. Exploring and developing reciprocity in research design. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education., (in press)
18. Trainor, A. A. and Bouchard, K. A. Exploring and developing reciprocity in research design. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, (in press)
19. van Es, E A. 2008. Mathematics teachers' "learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24: 244-276.
20. Zigo, D. 2001. Rethinking reciprocity: Collaboration in labor as a path toward equalizing power in classroom research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(3): 351-365.