Number Matters: The Multimodality of Internet Use as an Indicator of the Digital Inequalities

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 303-318

  Wei, Lu ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Digital divide; Digital inequalities; Internet use; Multimodality; Political participation

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL DIVIDE; DIGITAL INEQUALITIES; INTERNET USE; MULTI-MODALITY; POLITICAL PARTICIPATIONS;

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

EID: 84859644713     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01578.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Attewell, P. (2001). The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74, 252-259.
2. Baron, N.S. (2000). Alphabet to Email: How written English evolved and where it's heading. New York: Routledge.
3. Baym, N. K. (2009). A call for grounding in the face of blurred boundaries. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 14(3), 720-723.
4. Baym, N.K., Zhang, Y.B., & Lin, M.C. (2004). Social interactions across media: Interpersonal communication on the Internet, telephone and face-to-face. New Media & Society, 6(3), 299-318.
5. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6. Bernsen, N.O. (1994). Foundations of multimodal representations: A taxonomy of representational modalities. Interacting with Computers, 6(4), 347-371.
7. Bonfadelli, H. (2002). The Internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. European Journal of Communication, 17, 65-84.
8. Boulianne, S. (2009). Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193-211.
9. Castells, M. (2002) The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Cody, M. J., Dunn, D., Hoppin, S., &Wendt, P. (1999). Silver surfers: Training and evaluating Internet use among older adult learners. Communication Education, 48, 269-286.
11. Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22, 147-162.
12. Danet, B. (2001). Cyberpl@y: Communicating online. Oxford: Berg.
13. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996).What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14. Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: Henry Holt.
15. DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355-400). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
16. Drew, D., & Weaver, D. (2006). Voter learning in the 2004 presidential election: Did the media matter? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 25-42.
17. Drori, G. S., & Jang, Y.S. (2003). The global digital divide: A sociological assessment of trends and causes. Social Science Computer Review, 21(2), 144-161.
18. Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and "heterogeneity" of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59, 205-224.
19. Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Connecting news media use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Political Communication, 17, 215-237.
20. Facer, K., & Furlong, R. (2001). Beyond the myth of the "Cyberkid": Young people at the margins of the information revolution. Journal of Youth Studies, 4(4), 451-469.
21. Fischer, C.S. (1992). America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22. Gripsrud, J. (2009). Digitizing the public sphere: Two key issues. Javnost-the Public, 16(1), 5-16.
23. Guillén, M. F., & Suárez, S. (2005). Explaining the global digital divide: Economic, political and sociological drivers of cross-national Internet use. Social Forces, 84(2), 681-708.
24. Gunkel, D. J. (2003). Second thoughts: Toward a critique of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 5, 499-522.
25. Habermas, J. (1962). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skill. First Monday, 7(4). Retrieved January 15, 2005 from
27. Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults' use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35, 602-621.
28. Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication and Society, 8(2), 125-147.
29. Herring, S. C. (2002). Computer-mediated communication on the Internet. In B. Cornin (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 36, pp. 109-168). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
30. Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Schlosser, A. E. (2000). The evolution of the digital divide: How gaps in Internet access may impact electronic commerce. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(3). Retrieved May 15, 2009 from
31. Howard, P. N., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the Internet: The impact of a diffusing technology. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 383-404.
32. Jaimes, A., & Sebe, N. (2007). Multimodal human computer interaction: A survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 108(1-2), 116-134.
33. Jenkins, H. (2007). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: MacArthur Foundation.
34. Jung, J.-Y., Qiu, J. L., & Kim, Y.-C. (2001). Internet connectedness and inequality: Beyond the "divide". Communication Research, 28, 507-535.
35. Kim, S.-H. (2008). Testing the knowledge gap hypothesis in South Korea: Traditional news media, the Internet, and political learning. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20, 193-210.
36. Krueger, B. S. (2002). Assessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States. American Political Research, 30(5), 476-598.
37. Latimer, C. (2009). Understanding the complexity of the digital divide in relation to the quality of House campaign websites in the United States. New Media & Society, 11(6), 1023-1040.
38. Ledbetter, A. M. (2008). Media use and relational closeness in long-term friendships: Interpreting patterns of multimodality. New Media & Society, 10(4), 547-564.
39. Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., Fox, S., Horrigan, J., & Spooner, T. (2000). Who's not online: 57% of those without Internet access say they do not plan to log on. Retrieved May 20, 2001 from
40. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9, 671-696.
41. Loges, W. E., & Jung, J. Y. (2001). Exploring the digital divide: Internet connectedness and age. Communication Research, 28, 536-62.
42. Lüders, M. (2008). Conceptualizing personal media. New Media & Society, 10(5), 683-702.
43. Madden, M. (2003). America's online pursuits. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
44. McLaren, J., & Zappalà, G. (2002). The "digital divide" among financially disadvantaged families in Australia. First Monday, 7(11). Retrieved March 5, 2009 from
45. McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16, 315-336.
46. Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
47. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1998). Falling through the net II: New data on the digital divide. Retrieved May 15, 2009 from
48. Newton, K. (1999). Mass media effects: Mobilization or media malaise? British Journal of Political Science, 29, 577-599.
49. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2003). Gender and the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 111-121.
51. Parks, M. (2009). What will we study when the Internet disappears? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 724-729.
52. Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46, 80-97.
53. Prior, M. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 577-592.
54. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
55. Quintelier, E., & Vissers, S. (2008). The effect of Internet use on political participation: An analysis of survey results for 16-year-olds in Belgium. Social Science Computer Review, 26(4), 411-427.
56. Sandvig, C. (2001). Unexpected outcomes in digital divide policy: What children really do in the public library. In B. M. Compaine & S. Greenstein (Eds.), Communications policy in transition: The Internet and beyond (pp. 265-293). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Scheufele, D. A. (2002). Examining differential gains from mass media and their implications for participatory behavior. Communication Research, 29(1), 46-65.
58. Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6, 341-362.
59. Shah D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32, 531-565.
60. Sotirovic, M., & McLeod, J. M. (2001). Values, communication behavior, and political participation. Political Communication, 18, 273-300.
61. Standage, T. (1998). The Victorian Internet: The remarkable story of the telegraph and the nineteenth century's on-line pioneers. New York: Walker.
62. Sylvester, D. E., & McGlynn, A. J. (2010). The digital divide, political participation, and place. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 64-74.
63. Trenz, H. (2009). Digital media and the return of the representative public sphere. Javnost-the Public, 16(1), 33-46.
64. Van Dijk, J. (2002). A framework for digital divide research. Electronic Journal of Communication, 12. Retrieved January 15, 2004 from
65. Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp, J. A. Daly & G. R. Miller (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Wasserman, I. M., & Richmond-Abbott, M. (2005). Gender and the Internet: Causes of variation in access, level, and scope of use. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 252-270.
68. Wei, L. (2009). Filter blogs vs. personal journals: Understanding the knowledge production gap on the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 532-558.
69. Wei, L. & Hindman, D. B. (2011). Does the digital divide matter more? Comparing the effects of new media and old media use on the education-based knowledge gap. Mass Communication and Society, 14(2), 216-235.
70. Wei, L., & Zhang, M. (2008). The impact of Internet knowledge on college students' intention to continue to use the Internet. Information Research, 13(3) paper 348. Retrieved December 9, 2008 from
71. Xie, B. (2008). Multimodal computer-mediated communication and social support among older Chinese Internet users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 728-750.
72. Yu, L. (2006). Understanding information inequality: Making sense of the literature of the information and digital divides. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 38(4), 229-252.