Mechanical properties of totally permeable titanium composite pylon for direct skeletal attachment

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 100 B, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 993-999

  Pitkin, M ^a,b   Pilling, J ^c   Raykhtsaum, G ^b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Poly Orth International   (United States)

^c Michigan Technological University   (United States)

Author keywords

brittle fracture; direct skeletal attachment; implant design; implants; mechanical properties; sintering; stress cracking; titanium

Indexed keywords

CELL INGROWTH; DIRECT SKELETAL ATTACHMENT; DRILLED HOLES; IMPLANT DESIGN; LIMB PROSTHESIS; LOAD DISPLACEMENTS; LONG LASTING; POROUS TITANIUM; STRESS CRACKING; TITANIUM COMPOSITES;

BENDING STRENGTH; BIOMECHANICS; BONE; BRITTLE FRACTURE; DENTAL PROSTHESES; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; SINTERING;

TITANIUM;

TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE GROWTH; BONE MARROW CELL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; FRACTURE; IMPLANT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; POROSITY;

ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE AND BONES; BONE SUBSTITUTES; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY; PRESSURE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 84859591568     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.32663     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Galibin OV, Protasov MV, Chikhovskaya YV, Belyaeva IG, Pitkin MR,. Study of growth processes in bone and skin tissues in porous implants designed for fixation of external prosthesis after amputation of extremities. Cell Tissue Biol 2007; 1: 272-275.
2. Grynpas MD, Pilliar RM, Kandel RA, Renlund R, Filiaggi M, Dumitriu M,. Porous calcium polyphosphate scaffolds for bone substitute applications in vivo studies. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 2063-2070.
3. Vehof JW, van den Dolder J, de Ruijter JE, Spauwen PH, Jansen JA,. Bone formation in CaP-coated and noncoated titanium fiber mesh. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003; 64: 417-426.
4. Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Macnab I,. Porous surface layered prosthetic devices. Biomed Eng 1975; 10: 126-131.
5. Blinova MI, Yudintzeva NM, Nikolaenko NS, Potokin IL, Raykhtsaum G, Pitkin MR, Pinaev GP,. Cell cultivation on porous titanium implants with various structures. Cell Tissue Biol 2010; 4: 572-579.
6. Thomas KA, Cook SD,. Relationship between surface characteristics and the degree of bone-implant integration. J Biomed Mater Res 1992; 26: 831-833.
7. Merritt K, Shafer JW, Brown SA,. Implant site infection rates with porous and dense materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1979; 13: 101-108.
8. Di Carmine M, Toto P, Feliciani C, Scarano A, Tulli A, Strocchi R, Piattelli A,. Spreading of epithelial cells on machined and sandblasted titanium surfaces: An in vitro study. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 289-295.
9. Pendegrass CJ, Gordon D, Middleton CA, Sun SN, Blunn GW,. Sealing the skin barrier around transcutaneous implants: In vitro study of keratinocyte proliferation and adhesion in response to surface modifications of titanium alloy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 114-121.
10. Pitkin M,. On the way to total integration of prosthetic pylon with residuum. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009; 46: 345-360.
11. Pitkin M, Raykhtsaum G,. Skin integrated device, 2005: US Patent Application No. 11/233,233.
12. Dumas R, Cheze L, Frossard L,. Loading applied on prosthetic knee of transfemoral amputee: Comparison of inverse dynamics and direct measurements. Gait Posture 2009; 30: 560-562.
13. Albrektsson T, Johansson C,. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J 2001; 10 (Suppl 2): S96-S101.
14. Pitkin M, Raykhtsaum G, Pilling J, Shukeylo Y, Moxson V, Duz V, Lewandowski J, Connolly R, Kistenberg RS, Dalton JFt, Prilutsky B, Jacobson S,. Mathematical modeling and mechanical and histopathological testing of porous prosthetic pylon for direct skeletal attachment. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009; 46: 315-330.
15. Currey JD,. The design of mineralised hard tissues for their mechanical functions. J Exp Biol 1999; 202 (Part 23): 3285-3294.
16. Ruff CB,. Body size, body shape, and long bone strength in modern humans. J Hum Evol 2000; 38: 269-290.
17. Frossard L, Stevenson N, Smeathers J, Haggstrom E, Hagberg K, Sullivan J, Ewins D, Gow DL, Gray S, Branemark R,. Monitoring of the load regime applied on the osseointegrated fixation of a trans-femoral amputee: A tool for evidence-based practice. Prosthet Orthot Int 2008; 32: 68-78.
18. Pitkin M, Raykhtsaum G, Pilling J, Galibin O, Protasov M, Chihovskaya J, Belyaeva I, Blinova M, Yudintseva M, Potokin I, Pinaev G, Moxson V, Duz V,. Porous composite prosthetic pylon for integration with skin and bone. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007; 44: 723-738.
19. Clemow AJ, Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ, Koeneman J, Anderson J,. Interface mechanics of porous titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1981; 15: 73-82.
20. El Sayegh TY, Pilliar RM, McCulloch CA,. Attachment, spreading, and matrix formation by human gingival fibroblasts on porous-structured titanium alloy and calcium polyphosphate substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 61: 482-492.
21. Itala AI, Ylanen HO, Ekholm C, Karlsson KH, Aro HT,. Pore diameter of more than 100 micron is not requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 58: 679-683.
22. Cheung S, Gauthier M, Lefebvre LP, Dunbar M, Filiaggi M,. Fibroblastic interactions with high-porosity Ti-6Al-4V metal foam. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater 2007; 82: 440-449.
23. Pilkey WD,. Analysis and Design of Elastic Beams. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002.
24. Gere J, Timoshenko S,. Mechanics of Materials, 4th ed. PWS Publishing Co.; 1997.
25. Metals Handbook Vol. 2 Properties and Selection: Non-Ferrous Alloys and Specialty Materials, 10th Ed. ASM International; 1990.
26. Hamada H, Ohshima H, Ito A, Higuchi WI, Otsuka M,. Effect of geometrical structure on the biodegradation of a three-dimensionally perforated porous apatite/collagen composite bone cell scaffold. Biol Pharm Bull 2010; 33: 1228-1232.