Porous composite prosthetic pylon for integration with skin and bone

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 723-738

  Pitkin, Mark ^a,b   Raykhtsaum, Grigory ^c   Pilling, John ^d   Galibin, Oleg V ^e   Protasov, Mikhail V ^e   Chihovskaya, Julie V ^e   Belyaeva, Irina G ^e   Blinova, Miralda I ^f   Yudintseva, Natalia M ^f   Potokin, Igor L ^f   Pinaev, George P ^f   Moxson, Vladimir ^g   Duz, Volodimir ^g  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Poly Orth International   (United States)

^c Leach and Garner Company   (United States)

^d Michigan Technological University   (United States)

^e PAVLOV FIRST SAINT PETERSBURG STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^f INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^g ADMA Products Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Amputation; Bone; Cell ingrowth; Mathematical modeling; Mechanical testing; Prosthesis; Pylon; Rehabilitation; Residuum; Skin; Titanium

Indexed keywords

AMPUTATION; CELL INGROWTH; MATHEMATICAL MODELING; PROSTHESIS; PYLON; REHABILITATION; RESIDUUM;

BONE; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; PATIENT REHABILITATION; PROSTHETICS; REINFORCEMENT; SKIN; STRUCTURE (COMPOSITION); TITANIUM;

MECHANICAL TESTING;

INTEGRATION HOST FACTOR; SKIN AND BONE INTEGRATED PYLON; TITANIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BONE; BONE CELL; CELL GROWTH; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTEGRATION; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN; WIRE FIXATION; AMPUTATION; ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DISABLED PERSON; DISEASE MODEL; FUNCTIONS OF THE SKIN AND ITS APPENDAGES; THEORETICAL MODEL; WISTAR RAT;

AMPUTATION; AMPUTEES; ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE AND BONES; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OSSEOINTEGRATION; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SKIN; SKIN PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA;

EID: 65849444233     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 07487711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2006.12.0160     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Levy SW. Skin problems of amputee. St. Louis (MO): Warren H. Green; 1983.
2. Eriksson E, Brånemark PI. Osseointegration from the perspective of the plastic surgeon. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93(3):626-637
3. Brånemark R, Brånemark PI, Rydevik B, Myers RR. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: A review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38(2):175-181 [PMID: 11392650] (Pubitemid 34118850)
4. Sooriakumaran S, Robinson KP, Ward DA. Pattern of infection of transfemoral osseointegration. In: Proceedings of the 11th World Congress, International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; 2004 Aug 1-6; Wanchai, Hong Kong. Hong Kong: ISPO; 2004. p. 252.
5. Murphy EF. History and philosophy of attachment of prostheses to the musculo-skeletal system and of passage through the skin with inert materials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1973;7(3):275-295
6. Shin Y, Akao M. Tissue reactions to various percutaneous materials with different surface properties and structures. Artif Organs. 1997;21(9):995-1001.
7. Deligianni DD, Katsala ND, Koutsoukos PG, Missirlis YF. Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. Biomaterials. 2001;22(1):87-96.
8. Haggstrom E, Brånemark M. The osseointegrated transfemoral prosthesis. In: Proceedings of the 11th World Congress, International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; 2004 Aug 1-6; Wanchai, Hong Kong. Hong Kong: ISPO; 2004.
9. Yu C, Sun Y, Bradfield J, Fiordalisi I, Harris GD. A novel percutaneous barrier device that permits safe subcutaneous access. ASAIO J. 1999;45(6):531-534
10. Yu C, Harris GD. The LPD-II: A modified locked percutaneous device that permits safe subcutaneous access. ASAIO J. 2001;47(1):25-29.
11. Yu C, Harris GD, Sun Y. An alternative design of locked percutaneous device for skeletal extension through skin. Artif Organs. 2003;27(3):267-271
12. Pendegrass CJ, Goodship AE, Blunn GW. Development of a soft tissue seal around bone-anchored transcutaneous amputation prostheses. Biomaterials. 2006;27(23):4183-4191
13. Pendegrass CJ, Goodship AE, Price JS, Blunn GW. Nature's answer to breaching the skin barrier: An innovative development for amputees. J Anat. 2006;209(1):59-67.
14. Pitkin M, Raykhtsaum G, inventors. Skin integrated device. United States patent US N.20070071788. 2005 (in process).
15. Pitkin M, Raykhtsaum G, Galibin OV, Protasov MV, Chihovskaya JV, Belyaeva IG. Skin and bone integrated prosthetic pylon: A pilot animal study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(4):573-580
16. Yamada H, Evans FG. Strength of biological materials. Baltimore (MD): Williams and Wilkins Company; 1970.
17. Handbook of steel construction. Willowdale (Ontario): Canadian Institute of Steel Construction; 1977.
18. Bateni H, Olney SJ. Kinematic and kinetic variations of below-knee amputee gait. J Prosthet Orthot. 2002;14(1):2-10.
19. Smidt GL. Gait in rehabilitation. New York (NY): Churchill Livingstone; 1990.
20. Perry J, Boyd LA, Rao SS, Mulroy SJ. Prosthetic weight acceptance mechanics in transtibial amputees wearing the Single Axis, Seattle Lite, and Flex Foot. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1997;5(4):283-289
21. Yudintseva N, Blinova M, Pinaev G, Potokin I, Pitkin M, Raykhtsaum G. Characterization and morphology of cells cultivated on titanium implants of different structures. In: 2nd World Congress on Regenerative Medicine. 2005 May 18-20; Leipzig, Germany. Milan (Italy): International Journal of Artificial Organs; 2005.
22. Swanson SR. Introduction to design and analysis with advanced composite materials. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1997.
23. Li L, Aubertin M. A general relationship between porosity and uniaxial strength of engineering materials. Can J Civ Eng. 2003;30(4):644-658
24. Waite JH, Lichtenegger HC, Stucky GD, Hansma P. Exploring molecular and mechanical gradients in structural bioscaffolds. Biochemistry. 2004;43(24):7653-7662
25. Murray GA, Semple JC. Transfer of tensile loads from a prosthesis to bone using porous titanium. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63-B(1):138-141
26. Bünger MH, Foss M, Erlacher K, Li H, Zou X, Langdahl BL, Bünger C, Birkedal H, Besenbacher F, Pedersen JS. Bone nanostructure near titanium and porous tantalum implants studied by scanning small angle X-ray scattering. Eur Cell Mater. 2006;12:81-91.
27. Kim S, Wong P, Coulombe PA. A keratin cytoskeletal protein regulates protein synthesis and epithelial cell growth. Nature. 2006;441(7091):362-365
28. Brånemark R, Ohrnell LO, Nilsson P, Thomsen P. Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration during healing: An experimental in vivo study in the rat. Biomaterials. 1997;18(14):969-978
29. Brånemark R, Ohrnell LO, Skalak R, Carlsson L, Brånemark PI. Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration: An experimental in vivo investigation in the beagle dog. J Orthop Res. 1998;16(1):61-69.
30. Badylak SF. The extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2002;13(5):377-383
31. Fisher JP, Aegean Conferences. Tissue engineering. New York (NY): Springer; 2006.
32. Valentin JE, Badylak JS, McCabe GP, Badylak SF. Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for orthopaedic applications. A comparative histologic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(12):2673-2686
33. Brennan EP, Reing J, Chew D, Myers-Irvin JM, Young EJ, Badylak SF. Antibacterial activity within degradation products of biological scaffolds composed of extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(10):2949-2955
34. Sarikaya A, Record R, Wu CC, Tullius B, Badylak S, Ladisch M. Antimicrobial activity associated with extracellular matrices. Tissue Eng. 2002;8(1):63-71.
35. Vehof JW, Spauwen PH, Jansen JA. Bone formation in calcium-phosphate- coated titanium mesh. Biomaterials. 2000;21(19):2003-2009
36. Ciolfi VJ, Pilliar R, McCulloch C, Wang SX, Grynpas MD, Kandel RA. Chondrocyte interactions with porous titanum alloy and calcium polyphosphate substrates. Biomaterials. 2003;24(26):4761-4770
37. Wang J, Layrolle P, Stigter M, De Groot K. Biomimetic and electrolytic calcium phosphate coatings on titanium alloy: Physicochemical characteristics and cell attachment. Biomaterials. 2004;25(4):583-592
38. Lueck RA, Galante J, Rostoker W, Ray RD. Development of an open pore metallic implant to permit attachment to bone. Surg Forum. 1969;20:456-457
39. Galante J, Rostoker W, Lueck RA, Ray RD. Sintered fiber metal composites as a basis for attachment of implants to bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53(1):101-114
40. Pilliar RM, Filiaggi MJ, Wells JD, Grynpas MD, Kandel RA. Porous calcium polyphosphate scaffolds for bone substitute applications - In vitro characterization. Biomaterials. 2001;22(9):963-972
41. Chang YL, Stanford CM, Wefel JS, Keller JC. Osteoblastic cell attachment to hydroxyapatite-coated implant surfaces in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14(2):239-247
42. Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Osteoinduction of porous bioactive titanium metal. Biomaterials. 2004;25(3):443-450
43. Serro AP, Fernandes AC, Saramago B, Lima J, Barbosa MA. Apatite deposition on titanium surfaces - The role of albumin adsorption. Biomaterials. 1997;18(14):963-968
44. Cho SA, Jung SK. A removal torque of the laser-treated titanium implants in rabbit tibia. Biomaterials. 2003;24(26):4859-4863
45. Franke Stenport V, Johansson CB. Enamel matrix derivative and titanium implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(4):359-363
46. Bloebaum RD, Willie BM, Mitchell BS, Hofmann AA. Relationship between bone ingrowth, mineral apposition rate, and osteoblast activity. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;81(2):505-514
47. Oosterbos CJ, Vogely HCh, Nijhof MW, Fleer A, Verbout AJ, Tonino AJ, Dhert WJ. Osseointegration of hydroxyapatite-coated and noncoated Ti6Al4V implants in the presence of local infection: A comparative histomorphometrical study in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;60(3):339-347
48. Gorelik JV, Cherepanova OA, Voronkina IV, Diakonov IA, Blinova MI, Pinaev GP. Laminin-2/4 from human placenta is a better adhesion agent for primary keratinocytes than laminin-1 from EHS sarcoma. Cell Biol Int. 2001;25(5): 395-402.
49. Clark RA. The molecular and cellular biology of wound repair. New York (NY): Plenum Press; 1996.
50. Müller U, Imwinkelried T, Horst M, Sievers M, Graf-Hausner U. Do human osteoblasts grow into open-porous titanium? Eur Cell Mater. 2006;11:8-15. [PMID: 16425146] (Pubitemid 43824726)