Driving performance in a power wheelchair simulator

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 226-233

  Archambault, Philippe S ^a,b   Tremblay, Stéphanie ^a   Cachecho, Sarah ^a   Routhier, François ^c   Boissy, Patrick ^d,e  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b JEWISH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c INSTITUT DE RÉADAPTATION EN DÉFICIENCE PHYSIQUE DE QUÉBEC   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF GERIATRICS OF SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Driving skills; Driving strategies; Presence; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIDEORECORDING; WHEELCHAIR;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING; WHEELCHAIRS;

EID: 84859531468     PISSN: 17483107     EISSN: 17483115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2011.625072     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Statistics Canada. A profile of disability in Canada. Ottawa, CA: Statistics Canada; 2001 (catalogue No. 89-577-X1E).
2. Shields M. Use of wheelchairs and other mobility support devices. Health Rep 2004; 15: 37-41.
3. Nakamura F, Watada M, Kim YJ. Suggestion of one-hand type powerassisted wheelchair and driving control for persons with hemiplegia. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007; 36: 4786-4789.
4. Brandt A, Iwarsson S, Ståhle A. Older people's use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation. J Rehabil Med 2004; 36: 70-77. (Pubitemid 38401293)
5. Buning ME, Angelo JA, Schmeler MR. Occupational performance and the transition to powered mobility: A pilot study. Am J Occup Ther 2001; 55: 339-344. (Pubitemid 33661644)
6. Davies A, De Souza LH, Frank AO. Changes in the quality of life in severely disabled people following provision of powered indoor/outdoor chairs. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 286-290. (Pubitemid 36285053)
7. Evans S, Neophytou C, de Souza L, Frank AO. Young people's experiences using electric powered indoor-outdoor wheelchairs (EPIOCs): Potential for enhancing users' development? Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1281-1294. (Pubitemid 47189921)
8. Reid D, Laliberte-Rudman D, Hebert D. Impact of wheeled seated mobility devices on adult users' and their caregivers' occupational performance: A critical literature review. Can J Occup Ther 2002; 69: 261-280. (Pubitemid 36014598)
9. Gaal RP, Rebholtz N, Hotchkiss RD, Pfaelzer PF. Wheelchair rider injuries: Causes and consequences for wheelchair design and selection. J Rehabil Res Dev 1997; 34: 58-71. (Pubitemid 27066451)
10. Kirby RL, Ackroyd-Stolarz SA. Wheelchair safety-adverse reports to the United States Food and Drug Administration. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74: 308-312.
11. Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Boily J, Steele B, Odell L, Crawford EM, Desharnais G. Perceptions of power mobility use and safety within residential facilities. Can J Occup Ther 2005; 72: 142-152. (Pubitemid 40896201)
12. Mountain AD, Smith C, Kirby RL. Are wheelchair-skills assessment and training relevant for long-standing wheelchair users? Two case reports. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2010; 5: 230-233.
13. Holliday PJ, Mihailidis A, Rolfson R, Fernie G. Understanding and measuring powered wheelchair mobility and manoeuvrability. Part I. Reach in confined spaces. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 939-949. (Pubitemid 41052439)
14. Beaumont-White S, Ham RO. Powered wheelchairs: Are we enabling or disabling? Prosthet Orthot Int 1997; 21: 62-73. (Pubitemid 27204759)
15. Harrison A, Derwent G, Enticknap A, Rose FD, Attree EA. The role of virtual reality technology in the assessment and training of inexperienced powered wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 599-606.
16. Chase J, Bailey DM. Evaluating the potential for powered mobility. Am J Occup Ther 1990; 44: 1125-1129.
17. Brienza DM, Angelo J. A force feedback joystick and control algorithm for wheelchair obstacle avoidance. Disabil Rehabil 1996; 18: 123-129. (Pubitemid 26116006)
18. Marchuk ND, Ding D, Gaukrodger S. Development of a virtual platform for assessment and training of power wheelchair driving. Proc 30th RESNA Int Conf. Phoenix, USA; 2007.
19. Corfman TA, Cooper RA, Fitzgerald SG, Cooper R. Tips and falls during electric-powered wheelchair driving: Effects of seatbelt use, legrests, and driving speed. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 1797-1802. (Pubitemid 37509791)
20. Ummat S, Kirby RL. Non-fatal wheelchair-related accidents reported to the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 73: 163-167. (Pubitemid 24192980)
21. Salatin B, Rice I, Teodorski E, Ding D, Cooper RA. A survey of outdoor electric powered wheelchair driving. Proc 33th RESNA Int Conf. Las Vegas, USA; 2010.
22. Cooper RA, Dvorznak MJ, O'Connor TJ, Boninger ML, Jones DK. Braking electric-powered wheelchairs: Effect of braking method, seatbelt, and legrests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 1244-1249. (Pubitemid 28467494)
23. Corfman TA, Cooper RA, Dvorznak MJ, Fitzgerald SG, Boninger ML. The ability of physical and occupational therapists to recognize electric powered wheelchair driving accidents. Proc 26th RESNA Int Conf. Atlanta, Georgia; 2003.
24. Archambault PS, Routhier F, Hamel M, Boissy P. Analysis of movement to develop a virtual reality powered-wheelchair simulator. Proc Int Conf Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR) 2008: 133-138.
25. Archambault PS, Chong JNF, Sorrento G, Routhier F, Boissy P. Comparison of powered wheelchair driving performance in a real and in a simulated environment. Proc Int Conf Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR) 2011 27-29 June 2011. p 1-7.
26. Erren-Wolters CV, van Dijk H, de Kort AC, Ijzerman MJ, Jannink MJ. Virtual reality for mobility devices: training applications and clinicalresults: A review. Int J Rehabil Res 2007; 30: 91-96. (Pubitemid 46699382)
27. Chan E, Pradhan AK, Pollatsek A, Knodler MA, Fisher DL. Are driving simulators effective tools for evaluating novice drivers' hazard anticipation, speed management, and attention maintenance skills. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 2010; 13: 343-353.
28. Bieliauskas LA. Neuropsychological assessment of geriatric driving competence. Brain Inj 2005; 19: 221-226. (Pubitemid 40253810)
29. Trick LM, Toxopeus R, Wilson D. The effects of visibility conditions, traffic density, and navigational challenge on speed compensation and driving performance in older adults. Accid Anal Prev 2010; 42: 1661-1671.
30. Akinwuntan AE, De Weerdt W, Feys H, Pauwels J, Baten G, Arno P, Kiekens C. Effect of simulator training on driving after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Neurology 2005; 65: 843-850. (Pubitemid 41362127)
31. Heeter C. Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence 1992; 1: 262-271.
32. Bystrom K, Barfield W, Hendrix C. A conceptual model of the sense of presence in virtual environment. Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1999; 8: 241-244.
33. Van Schaik P, Blake J, Pernet F, Spears I, Fencott C. Virtual augmented exercise gaming for older adults. The impact of the Internet, multimediaand virtual reality on behavior and society. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008; 11: 103-106 .
34. Tichon JG. Using presence to improve a virtual training environment. Cyberpsychol Behav: The impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society. 2007; 10: 781-787 . (Pubitemid 350275690)
35. Boissy P, Hamel M, Archambault P, Routhier F. Ecological measurement of powered wheelchair mobility and driving performance using event-driven identification and classification methods. Proc 31st RESNA Int Conf. Washington, DC; 2008 .
36. Regenbrecht H, Schubert T. Real and illusory interaction enhance presence in virtual environments. Presence-Teleop Virt 2002; 11: 425-434 .
37. Schubert T. The sense of presence in virtual environments: A threecomponent scale measuring spatial presence, involvement, and realness. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie 2003; 15: 69-71.
38. Creem-Regehr SH, Willemsen P, Gooch AA, Thompson WB. The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: Implications for real and virtual indoor environments. Perception 2005; 34: 191-204. (Pubitemid 40482629)
39. Ellis SR, Menges BM. Localization of virtual objects in the near visual field. Hum Factors 1998; 40: 415-431. (Pubitemid 28551220)
40. Loomis JM, Knapp JM. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In: Hettinger LJ, Haas MW, Editors. Virtual and adaptive environments. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum; 2003. pp 21-46.
41. Plumert JM, Kearney JK, Cremer JF, Recker K. Distance perception in real and virtual environments. ACM Trans Appl Percept 2005; 2: 216-233.
42. Knapp JM, Loomis JM. Limited field of view of head-mounted displays is not the cause of distance underestimation in virtual environments. Presence-Teleop Virt 2004; 13: 572-577 . (Pubitemid 39580071)
43. Sorrento G, Routhier F, Boissy P, Dessureault D, Archambault PS. Measurement of powered wheelchair driving skills in adults using a data logger. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011; 8: 31.
44. Shechtman O, Classen S, Awadzi K, Mann W. Comparison of driving errors between on-the-road and simulated driving assessment: A validation study. Traffic Inj Prev 2009; 10: 379-385.
45. Strayer DL, Drews FA. Simulator training improves driver efficiency: Transfer from the simulator to the real world. In: McGehee DV, Lee JD, and Rizzo M, Editors. Driving Assessment 2003: International Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, andVehicle Design. IA, USA: Public Policy Center; University of Iowa 2002. pp 190-193.