Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: Long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study

Annals of Oncology

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 903-911

  Nam, J H ^a   Park, J Y ^a   Kim, D Y ^a   Kim, J H ^a   Kim, Y M ^a   Kim, Y T ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Early stage cervical cancer; Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy; Open radical hysterectomy; Surgical outcomes; Survival outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER RISK; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; RISK FACTOR; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT RESPONSE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 84859493705     PISSN: 09237534     EISSN: 15698041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr360     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int J Cancer 2001; 94: 153-156.
2. Kim YT. Current status of cervical cancer and HPV infection in Korea. J Gynecol Oncol 2009; 20: 1-7.
3. Han CH, Cho HJ, Lee SJ et al. The increasing frequency of cervical cancer in Korean women under 35. Cancer Res Treat 2008; 40: 1-5.
4. Waggoner SE. Cervical cancer. Lancet 2003; 361: 2217-2225.
5. Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 1997; 350: 535-540.
6. Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH et al. Outcomes after radical hysterectomy according to tumor size divided by 2-cm interval in patients with early cervical cancer. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 59-67.
7. Delgado G, Bundy B, Zaino R et al. Prospective surgical-pathological study of disease-free interval in patients with stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 1990; 38: 352-357.
8. Sedlis A, Bundy BN, Rotman MZ et al. A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol 1999; 73: 177-183.
9. Sevin BU, Lu Y, Bloch DA et al. Surgically defined prognostic parameters in patients with early cervical carcinoma. A multivariate survival tree analysis. Cancer 1996; 78: 1438-1446.
10. Zreik TG, Chambers JT, Chambers SK. Parametrial involvement, regardless of nodal status: a poor prognostic factor for cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 741-746.
11. Peters WA III, Liu PY, Barrett RJ II et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 1606-1613.
12. Nezhat CR, Nezhat FR, Burrell MO et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic node dissection. J Gynecol Surg 1993; 9: 105-120.
13. Spirtos NM, Schlaerth JB, Spirtos TW et al. Laparoscopic bilateral pelvic and paraaortic lymph node sampling: an evolving technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 105-111.
14. Lee CL, Huang KG, Jain S et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and conventional surgery in the treatment of early cervical cancer. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2002; 9: 481-487.
15. Abu-Rustum NR, Gemignani ML, Moore K et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91: 402-409.
16. Nam JH, Kim JH, Kim DY et al. Comparative study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 92: 277-283.
17. Zakashansky K, Chuang L, Gretz H et al. A case-controlled study of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in a fellowship training program. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007; 17: 1075-1082.
18. Li G, Yan X, Shang H et al. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 105: 176-180.
19. Frumovitz M, dos Reis R, Sun CC et al. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 96-102.
20. Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16: 1316-1323.
21. Monk BJ, Tewari K, Gamboa-Vujicic G et al. Does perioperative blood transfusion affect survival in patients with cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy? Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 343-348.
22. Lentz SS, Shelton BJ, Toy NJ. Effects of perioperative blood transfusion on prognosis in early-stage cervical cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1998; 5: 216-219.
23. Spirtos NM, Westby CM, Averette HE, Soper JT. Blood transfusion and the risk of recurrence in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study. Am J Clin Oncol 2002; 25: 398-403.
24. Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Ballon SC. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 340-348.