Comparative study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 277-283

  Nam, Joo Hyun ^a   Kim, Jong Hyeok ^a   Kim, Dae Yeon ^a   Kim, Mi Kyung ^a   Yoo, Hang Jo ^a   Kim, Yong Man ^a   Kim, Young Tak ^a   Mok, Jung Eun ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Laparoscopic surgery; Radical hysterectomy

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EARLY CANCER; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC VAGINAL RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPHADENECTOMY; METHODOLOGY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PARAAORTIC LYMPH NODE; PATHOLOGY; PELVIS LYMPH NODE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; RECURRENCE RISK; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SAMPLING; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;

EID: 0742289980     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Dargent D. A new future for Schauta operation through presurgical retroperitoneal pelviscopy. Eur. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 8:1987;292-296.
2. Malur S., Possover M., Schneider A. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer. Surg. Endosc. 15(3):2001;289-292.
3. Roy M., Plante M., Renaud M.C., Tetu B. Vaginal radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 62:1996;336-339.
4. Nezhat C., Nezhat F., Welander C. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of carcinoma of the cervix. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 166:1992;864-865.
5. Querleu D. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy. Gynecol. Oncol. 51(2):1993;248-254.
6. Sedlacek T.V., Campion M., Reich H., Sedlacek T. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a feasible study. Presented at the 26th annual meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists. February:1995.
7. Pomel C., Canis M., Mage G., Dauplat J., Le Bouedec G., Raiga J.et al. Laparoscopically extended hysterectomy for cervix cancer: technique, indications and results. Apropos of a series of 41 cases in Clermont. Chirurgie. 122(2):1997;133-136. discussion 136-7. French.
8. Hsieh Y.Y., Lin W.C., Chang C.C., Yeh L.S., Hsu T.Y., Tsai H.D. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with low paraaortic, subaortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Results of short-term follow-up. J. Reprod. Med. 43(6):1998;528-534.
9. Renaud M.C., Plante M., Roy M. Combined laparoscopic vaginal surgery in cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 79:2000;59-63.
10. Hawnaur J.M., Johnson R.J., Buckley C.H., Tindall V., Isherwood I. Staging, volume estimation and assessment of nodal status in carcinoma of the cervix: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with surgical findings. Clin. Radiol. 49:1994;443-452.
11. Mayr N.A., Magnotta V.A., Ehrhardt J.C., Wheeler J.A., Sorosky J.I., Wen B.C.et al. Usefulness of volumetry by magnetic resonance imaging in assessing response to radiation therapy in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 35:1996;915-924.
12. Hricak H., Quivey J.M., Campos Z., Gildengorin V., Hindmarsh T., Bis K.G.et al. Carcinoma of the cervix: predictive value of clinical and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging assessment of prognostic factors. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 27:1993;791-801.
13. Ebner F., Tamussino K., Kressel H.Y. Magnetic resonance imaging in cervical carcinoma: diagnosis, staging, and follow-up. Magn. Reson. Q. 10:1994;22-42.
14. Fischetti S.G., Politi G., Lomeo E., Garozzo G., Di Leo S., Nuciforo G. Carcinoma of the uterine cervical canal. Staging and biometric assessment with magnetic resonance. Radiol. Med. (Torino). 88:1994;445-452.
15. Piver M.S., Rutledge F., Smith J.P. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for woman with cervical cancer. Obstet. Gynecol. 44:1974;265-272.
16. Kinney W.K., Hodge D.O., Egorshin E.V., Ballard D.J., Podratz K.C. Identification of a low-risk subset of patients with stage IB invasive squamous cancer of the cervix possibly suited to less radical surgical treatment. Gynecol. Oncol. 57:1995;3-6.
17. Magrina J.F., Goodrich M.A., Weaver A.L., Podratz K.C. Modifed radical hysterectomy: morbidity and mortality. Gynecol. Oncol. 59:1995;277-282.
18. Magrina J.F., Goodrich M.A., Lidner T.K., Weaver A.L., Cornella J.L., Podratz K.C. Modified radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early squamous cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 72:1999;183-186.
19. Griffith J.P., Everitt N.J., Lancaster F., Boylston A., Richards S.J., Scott C.S.et al. Influence of laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy upon cell-mediated immunity. Br. J. Surg. 82(5):1995;677-680.
20. Decker D., Schondorf M., Bidlingmaier F., Hirner A., von Ruecker A.A. Surgical stress induces a shift in the type-1/type-2 T-helper cell balance, suggesting down-regulation of cell-mediated and up-regulation of antibody-mediated immunity commensurate to the trauma. Surgery. 119(3):1996;316-325.
21. Allendorf J.D., Bessler M., Whelan R.L. A murine model of laparoscopic-assisted intervention. Surg. Endosc. 11(6):1997;622-624.
22. Hartley J.E., Mehigan B.J., MacDonald A.W., Lee P.W., Monson J.R. Patterns of recurrence and survival after laparoscopic and conventional resections for colorectal carcinoma. Ann. Surg. 232(2):2000;181-186.