Alone or together - Examples from history research

Proceedings of ISSI 2011 - 13th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 595-604

  Must, Ülle ^a  

^a Archimedes Foundation   (Estonia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CITATION ANALYSIS;

HISTORY;

EID: 84859433472     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (66)

1. Archambault, E., Vignola-Gagne, E., Cote, G., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y. (2006). Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics, 68(3), 329-342.
2. Archambault, É.; Gagné, É. V. (2004). The Use of Bibliometrics in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Prepared for the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Retrieved October 10, 2010 from: http://www.sciencemetrix. com/pdf/SM-2004-008-SSHRC-Bibliometrics-Social-Science.pdf
3. Bordons, M., Gomez, I., Fernandez, M.T., Zulueta, M.A., & Mendez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37(2), 279-295.
4. Buchanan, G., Cunningham, S.J., Blandford, A., Rimmer, J., Warwick, C. (2005). Information Seeking by Humanities Scholars. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries
5. Cullars J.M. (1998). Citation characteristics of English-language monographs in philosophy. Library and Information Science Research, 20(1), 41-68.
6. Duff, W., Craig, B., Cherry, J. (2004). Historians' Use of Archival Sources: Promises and Pitfalls of the Digital Age. The Public Historian, 26 (2), 7-22.
7. European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH). Retrieved October 10, 2010 from: http://www.esf.org/research-areas/humanities/erih-european-reference-index-for-thehumanities. html
8. Finkenstaedt, T. (1990). Measuring research performance in the humanities. Scientometrics, 19(5-6), 409-417.
9. Galbraith, R.F., Roberts, R.G., Laslett, G.M. (1999). Optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz from jinmium rock shelter, northern Australia. Archaeometry, 41, 339-364.
10. Garfield, E. (1979). Most-Cited Authors in the Arts and Humanities 1977-1978. Current Content, 32, 5-10.
11. Garfield, E. (1980). Is Information Retrieval in the arts and humanities inherently different from that in science? The Effect that ISI's Citation Index for the Arts and Humanities is expected to have on future Scholarship. Library Quarterly, 50 (1), 40-57.
12. Garfield, E. (1982). Arts and Humanities Journals Differ from Natural and Social Sciences Journals -But Their Similarities Are Surprising. Current Content, 47, 5-11.
13. Giménez-Toledo, E., Román-Román, A. (2009). Assessment of humanities and social sciences monographs through their publishers: a review and a study towards a model of evaluation. Research Evaluation, 18(3), 201-213.
14. Giménez-Toledo, E., Román-Román, A., Maria Dolores A-P. (2007). From experimentation to coordination in the evaluation of Spanish scientific journals in the humanities and social sciences. Research Evaluation, 16 (2), 137-148.
15. Glänzel, W. (2000). Science in Scandinavia: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 48(2), 121-150.
16. Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69-115.
17. Green, R. (2000). Locating sources in humanities scholarship: the efficacy of following bibliographic references. http://openurl.ebscohost.com/linksvc/linking.aspx?custid=s7650103&sid=google&auinit= R&aulast=Green&atitle=Locating+sources+in+humanities+scholarship:+the+efficacy+of+ following+bibliographic+references&title=Library+Quarterly&volume=70&issue=2&date =2000&spage=201&issn=0024-2519 The Library Quarterly, 70(2), 201-229.
18. Hagtvedt Vik, H. (2010). Success in history comes from taking an international view. Research Europe, 30 September.
19. Hellqvist, B. (2010). Referencing in the Humanities and its Implications for Citation Analysis Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2),310-318.
20. Helm, T.E. (2000). What Are You Assessing? College Teaching, 48 (3), 90-94.
21. Hicks, D. (1999). The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences. Scientometrics, 44(2), 193-215.
22. Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. In: Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Kluwer Academic Publisher, 473-493.
23. Hider, P.M. (1996). Three bibliometric analyses of anthropology literature. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 15(1), 1-17.
24. History free of politics. (2010). Research Europe, 25 March.
25. H'rubel, J.P.V.M., Goedeken, E.A. (2001). Using the Arts and Humanities Citation Index to identify a community of interdisciplinary historians: An exploratory bibliometric study. Serials Librarian, 41(1), 85-98.
26. Humanities Indicators. Retrieved October 10, 2010 from: http://www.humanitiesindicators.org/humanitiesData.aspx
27. Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B., Noyons, E. (2001). Mapping national research profiles in social science disciplines. Journal of Documentation, 57(6), 715-740.
28. Jokisipilä, M. (2007). Historiantutkijat mukaan menneisyydenhallintaan. Helsingin Sanomat, 03 November.
29. Jones, C., Champman, M., Woods, P.C. (1972). The characteristics of the literature used by historians. Journal of Librarianship 4(3), 137-156.
30. Katz, J.S., Martin, B.R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26 (1), 1-18.
31. Kousha, K., Thelwall, M. (2009). Google Book Search: Citation Analysis for Social Science and the Humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1537-1549.
32. Kuang-hua Chen. (2004). The construction of the Taiwan Humanities Citation Index. Online Information Review, 28(6), 410-419.
33. Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Archambault, E. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519-533.
34. Levitt, J.M., Thelwall, M. (2010). Does the higher citation of collaborative research differ from region to region? A case study of Economics. Scientometrics, 85 (1), 171-183.
35. Lewison, G. (2001). Evaluation of books as research outputs in history of medicine. Research Evaluation, 10(2), 89-95.
36. Linmans, A. J. M.(2010). Why with bibliometrics the Humanities does not need to be the weakest link Indicators for research evaluation based on citations, library holdings, and productivity measures. Scientometrics, 83, 337-354.
37. Moed, H. F, Luwei, M, Nederhof, A. J. (2002). Towards research performance in the humanities. Library Trends, 50 (3), 498-520.
38. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.
39. Mortimer, I. (2008). What Isn't History? The Nature and Enjoyment of History in the Twenty-First Century. History, 93(312), 454-474.
40. Mu-hsuan Huang, Yu-wei Chang. (2008). Characteristics of Research Output in Social Sciences and Humanities: From a Research Evaluation Perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1819-1828.
41. Must, Ü. (1999). Estonian historical science in the 1990s. Research Evaluation, 8(2), 77-82.
42. Must, Ü. (2006). Fieldwork in History: use of bibliometrics. Proceedings of International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Seventh COLLNET Meeting. SRDI-INISTCNRS-Loria: Nancy, 452-458. Retrieved 15.03.2011 from http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00006349/
43. Nederhof, A.J., Noyons, E.C.M. (1992). International Comparison of Departments' Research Performance in the Humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43(3), 249-256.
44. Nederhof, A.J., Zwaan R. A. (1991). Quality Judgements of Journals as Indicators of Research Performance in the Humanities and the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42(5), 332-340.
45. Nederhof, A.J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review. Scientometrics 66(1), 81-100.
46. Nederhof, A.J., Zwaan R.A., De Bruin R.E., Dekker P.J. (1989). Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and behavioural sciences: a comparative study. Scientometrics 15(5-6), 423-435.
47. Persson, O. (2010). Are highly cited papers more international? Scientometrics, 83, 397-401.
48. Persson, O., Glänzel, W., Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421-432. Russian Index for Science Citation (RISC). Retrieved October 10, 2010 from: http://eLIBRARY.RU
49. Sahiner M, Tonta Y. (2006). Arts and humanities literature: Bibliometric characteristics of contributions by Turkish authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1011-1022.
50. Serbian Citation Index. Retrieved October 10, 2010 from: http://scindeks.nb.rs/static/about.aspx?lang=en
51. Šipka P. (2005). The Serbian Citation Index: Context and content, in: Proceedings of ISSI 2005, Stockholm, Sweden, July 24-28, ISSI and Karolinska Univ. Press, Stockholm, 710-711.
52. Solow, R. M., Franklin, P., Jones C. C., D'Arms, J., Oakley, F. (2002). Making the Humanities Count: The Importance of Data, American Academy of Arts & Sciences, Cambridge.
53. Stone, S. (1982). Humanities scholars: information needs and uses. Journal of Documentation,38(4), 292-313.
54. Su, X.N., Han, X.M., Han, X.N. (2001). Developing the Chinese Social Science Citation Index. Online Information Review, 25(6), 365-369.
55. The Countries of the UK. Retrieved March 16, 2011 from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/uk-countries.asp
56. (2011). Top 20 Journals in History. THES, 13 January. Retrieved 15.03.2011 from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=414798
57. Torres-Salinas, D., Moed, H.F. (2009). Library Catalog Analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study of published book titles in Economics. Journal of Informetrics, 3(1), 9-26.
58. van Leeuwen, T. N, Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J.W., Visser, M.S., van Raan, A.F.J. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51(1), 335-346.
59. Vesper, I. (2010). History researchers need to embrace collaboration. Research Europe, 25 March.
60. Webster, B.M. (1998). Polish sociology citation index as an example of usage of national citation indexes in scientometric analysis of social sciences. Journal of Information Science, 24(1), 19-32.
61. White, H.D., Boell, S.B., Hairong Yu, Davis, M., Wilson, C.S., Cole, F.T.H. (2009). Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6), 1083-1096.
62. Whitley, R. (1984). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
63. Winclawska, B.M. (1996). Polish sociology citation index (principles for creation and the first results). Scientometrics, 35(3), 387-391.
64. Wu Xiaoqun. (2009). Do We Really Need a "Global View of History"? Chinese Studies in History, 42(3), 45-50.
65. Yalcin H. (2010). Bibliometric Profile of Journal of National Folklore (2007-2009). Milli Folklor, 85, 205-211.
66. Zwaan, R.A., Nederhof, A.J. (1990). Some aspects of scholarly communication in linguistics: An empirical study. Language, 66, 523-527.