Bibliometric profile of journal of national folklore (2007-2009);Millî folklor dergisinin bibliyometrik profili (2007-2009)

Milli Folklor

Volumn , Issue 85, 2010, Pages 205-211

  Yalçin, Hayder ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Journal of national folklore; Literature obsolescence

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959638881     PISSN: 13003984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Al, U. ve Coştur, R. "Türk Psikoloji Dergisi'nin bibliyometrik profili". Türk Kütüphaneciliǧi, 21(2), 142-163.
2. Al, U., Şahiner, M. ve Tonta, Y. "Arts and humanities literature: Bibliometric characteristics of contributions by Turkish authors." Journal of the American Society for Information Science ve Technology, 57(8), 1011.
3. Borgman, C. ve Furner, J. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics: Sage Newbury Park, CA, 1990.
4. Budd, J. Characteristics of written scholarship in American Literature: A citation study. Library and Information Science Research, 8(2), 189-211.
5. Case, D. ve Higgins, G. "How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication." Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 635-645.
6. Cullars, J. "Characteristics of the monographic literature of British and American Literary Studies." College and Research Libraries, 46(6), 511-522.
7. Cullars, J. "Citation characteristics of monographs in the fine arts." The Library Quarterly, 62(3), 325-342.
8. Cullars, J. "Citation characteristics of English-language monographs in philosophy." Library and Information Science Research, 20(1), 41-68.
9. Diodato, V. ve Smith, F. "Obsolescence of music literature." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 44(2), 101-112.
10. Edwards, S. "Citation analysis as a collection development tool: A bibliometric study of polymer science theses and dissertations." Serials Review, 25(1), 11-20.
11. Garfield, E. "Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation." Science, 178(4060), 471-479.
12. Heinzkill, R. "Characteristics of references in selected scholarly English literary journals." The Library Quarterly, 50(3), 352-365.
13. Lancaster, F. If you want to evaluate your library. London: The Library Association, 1987.
14. Lawani, S. "Bibliometrics: its theoretical foundations, methods and applications." Libri, 31(4) 294-315.
15. Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y., ve Warner, J. "The role of monographs in scholarly communication: an empirical study of philosophy, sociology and economics." Journal of Documentation, 52, 389-404.
16. McCain, K. "Citation patterns in the history of technology." Library ve Information Science Research, 9(1), 41-59.
17. Moed, H. F. Citation analysis in research evaluation: Springer, 2005.
18. Perrrault, A. H. "Humanities collection management - an impressionistic/realistic/optimistic appraisal of the state of the art." Collection Management, 3(3/4), 1-23.
19. Price, D. "Networks of scientific papers." Science, 149, 510-515.
20. Pritchard, A. "Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics?" Journal of Documentation, 25, 348-349.
21. Smith, L. "Citation analysis." Library Trends, 30(1), 83-106.
22. Stern, M. "Characteristics of the literature of literary scholarship." College and Research Libraries, 44(4), 199-209.
23. Stone, S. "Progress in documentation." The Journal of Documentation, 38(4), 292-313.
24. Thompson, J. "The death of the scholarly monograph in the humanities? Citation patterns in literary scholarship." Libri, 52(3), 121-136.
25. White, E. "Bibliometrics: From Curiosity to Convention." Special Libraries, 76(1), 35-42.
26. White, H. ve McCain, K. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.