Auditory long latency responses to tonal and speech stimuli

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 447-459

  Swink, Shannon ^a,b   Stuart, Andrew ^a  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Hearing; Late auditory cortical evoked potential; Speech stimuli

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; REACTION TIME; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; SEX FACTORS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859399080     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0364)     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Agung, K., Purdy, S. C., McMahon, C. M., & Newall, P. (2006). The use of cortical auditory evoked potentials to evaluate neural encoding of speech sounds in adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 17, 559-572.
2. Alain, C., Woods, D. L., & Covarrubias, D. (1997). Activation of duration-sensitive auditory cortical fields in humans. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 104, 531-539.
3. Alho, K., Sams, M., Paavilainen, P., & Näätänen, R. (1986). Small pitch separation and the selective-attention effect on the ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 189-197.
4. AmericanNational Standards Institute. (1996). Specification for audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1996). New York, NY: Author.
5. American National Standards Institute. (1999). Permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms (ANSI S3.1-1999). New York, NY: Author.
6. Antinoro, F., Skinner, P. H., & Jones, J. J. (1969). Relation between sound intensity and amplitude of the AER at different stimulus frequencies. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46, 1433-1436.
7. Assmann, P. F., & Katz, W. F. (2000). Time-varying spectral change in the vowels of children and adults. The Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1856-1866.
8. Beagley, H. A., & Sheldrake, J. B. (1978). Differences in brainstem response latency with age and sex. British Journal of Audiology, 12, 69-77.
9. Benson, R. R., Whalen, D. H., Richardson, M., Swainson, B., Clark, V. P., Lai, S., & Liberman, A. M. (2001). Parametrically dissociating speech and nonspeech perception in the brain using fMRI. Brain and Language, 78, 364-396.
10. Bergholtz, L. (1981). Normative data in clinical ABR. Scandinavian Audiology, 13, 185-190.
11. Borden, G. J. (1979). An interpretation of research on feedback interruption in speech. Brain and Language, 7, 307-319.
12. Brungart, D. S., Iyer, N., & Simpson, B. D. (2006). Monaural speech segregation using synthetic speech signals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2327-2333.
13. Budd, T.W., Barry, R. J., Gordon, E., Rennie, C., & Michie, P. T. (1998). Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: Habituation vs. refractoriness. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 31, 51-68.
14. Burnett, T. A., Freeland, M. B., Larson, C. R., & Hain, T. C. (1998). Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 3153-3161.
15. Carter, M., Rastatter, M. P., Walker, M. M., & O'Brien, K. (2009). The effects of frequency altered feedback on the reading processes of adults with reading disorders. Neuroscience Letters, 461, 69-73.
16. Čeponiene, R., Alku, P., Westerfield, M., Torki, M., & Townsend, J. (2005). ERPs differentiate syllable and nonphonetic sound processing in children and adults. Psychophysiology, 42, 391-406.
17. Čeponiene, R., Shestakova, A., Balan, P., Alku, P., Yiaguchi, K., & Näätänen, R. (2001). Children's auditory event-related potentials index sound complexity and "speechness." International Journal of Neuroscience, 109, 245-260.
18. Chan, Y.W., Woo, E. K.W., Hammond, S. R., Yiannikas, C., & McLeod, J. G. (1988). The interaction between sex and click polarity in brain-stem auditory potentials evoked from control subjects of Oriental and Caucasian origin. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 71, 77-80.
19. Chen, S. H., Liu, H., Xu, Y., & Larson, C. R. (2007). Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted voice feedback during English speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 1157-1163.
20. Cunningham, J., Nicol, T., Zecker, S., & Kraus, N. (2000). Speech-evoked neurophysiologic responses in children with learning problems: Development and behavioral correlates of perception. Ear and Hearing, 21, 554-568.
21. Davis, H., Mast, T., Yoshie, N., & Zerlin, S. (1966). The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: Recovery process. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 21, 105-113.
22. Davis, H., & Zerlin, S. (1966). Acoustic relations of the human vertex potential. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 39, 109-116.
23. Dean, M. S., & Martin, F. N. (2000). Insert earphone depth and the occlusion effect. American Journal of Audiology, 9, 131-134.
24. Dehan, C. P., & Jerger, J. (1990). Analysis of gender differences in the auditory brainstem response. Laryngoscope, 100, 18-24.
25. Diesch, E., Eulitz, C., Hampson, S., & Ross, B. (1996). The neurotopography of vowels as mirrored by evoked magnetic field measurements. Brain and Language, 53, 143-168.
26. Digeser, F. M., Wohlberedt, T., & Hoppe, U. (2009). Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Ear and Hearing, 30, 704-712.
27. Don, M., Ponton, C. W., Eggermont, J. J., & Masuda, A. (1993). Gender differences in cochlear response time: An explanation for gender amplitude differences in the unmasked auditory brain-stem response. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 2135-2148.
28. Eddins, A. C., & Peterson, J. R. (1999). Time-intensity trading in the late auditory evoked potential. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 516-525.
29. Elfner, L. F., Gustafson, D. J., & Williams, K. N. (1976). Signal onset and task variables in auditory evoked potentials. Biological Psychology, 4, 197-205.
30. Elman, J. L. (1981). Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, 45-50.
31. Eulitz, C., Diesch, E., Pantev, C., Hampson, S., & Elbert, T. (1995). Magnetic and electric brain activity evoked by the processing of tone and vowel stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 2748-2755.
32. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). "Mini-Mental State": A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
33. Fruhstorfer, H., Soveri, P., & Järvilehto, T. (1970). Short-term habituation of the auditory evoked response in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 28, 153-161.
34. Gölgeli, A., Süer, C., Özesmi, Ç., Dolu, N., Aşcioǧlu, M., & Sahin, O. (1999). The effect of sex differences on event-related potentials in young adults. International Journal of Neuroscience, 99, 69-77.
35. Guenther, F. H. (2006). Cortical interactions underlying the production of speech sounds. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 350-365.
36. Guenther, F. H., Ghosh, S. S., & Tourville, J. A. (2006). Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain and Language, 96, 280-301.
37. Gunji, A., Hoshiyama, M., & Kakigi, R. (2000). Identification of auditory evoked potentials of one's own voice. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 214-219.
38. Hall, J. W., III (2007). New handbook of auditory evoked responses. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
39. Hari, R., Kaila, K., Katila, T., Tuomisto, T., & Varpula, T. (1982). Interstimulus interval dependence of the auditory vertex response and its magnetic counterpart: Implications for their neural generation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 54, 561-556.
40. Hawks, J. W., & Miller, J. D. (1995). A formant bandwidth estimation procedure for vowel synthesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1343-1344.
41. Heinks-Maldonado, T. H., Mathalon, D. H., Gray, M., & Ford, J. M. (2005). Fine-tuning of auditory cortex during speech production. Psychophysiology, 42, 180-190.
42. Heinks-Maldonado, T. H., Mathalon, D. H., Houde, J. F., Gray, M., Faustman, W. O., & Ford, J. M. (2007). Relationship of imprecise corollary discharge in schizophrenia to auditory hallucinations. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, 286-296.
43. Hoffman, L. D., & Polich, J. (1999). P300, handedness, and corpus callosal size: Gender, modality, and task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 31, 163-174.
44. Houde, J. F., Nagarajan, S. S., Sekihara, K., & Merzenich, M. M. (2002). Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: An MEG study. The Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1125-1138.
45. Hyde, M. (1997). The N1 response and its applications. Audiology and Neurotology, 2, 281-307.
46. Jacobson, G. P., Ahmad, B. K., Moran, J., Newman, C. W., Wharton, J., & Tepley, N. (1992). Occurrence of auditory evoked field (AEF): N1M and P2M components in a sample of normal subjects. Ear and Hearing, 13, 387-395.
47. Jeannerod, M. (1998). The neural and behavioral organization of goal-directed movements. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
48. Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
49. Kudo, N., Nakagome, K., Kasai, K., Araki, T., Fukuda, M., Kato, N., & Iwanami, A. (2004). Effects of corollary discharge on event-related potentials during selective attention task in healthy men and women. Neuroscience Research, 48, 59-64.
50. Larson, C. R., Burnett, T. A., Kiran, S., & Hain, T. C. (2000). Effects of pitch-shift velocity on voice F0 responses. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 559-564.
51. Martin, B. A., Sigal, A., Kurtzberg, D., & Stapells, D. R. (1997). The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 1585-1599.
52. Martin, B. A., & Stapells, D. R. (2005). Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech. Ear and Hearing, 26, 195-213.
53. Martin, B. A., Tremblay, K. L., & Korczak, P. (2008). Speech evoked potentials: From the laboratory to the clinic. Ear and Hearing, 29, 285-313.
54. Milner, B. A. (1969). Evaluation of auditory function by computer techniques. International Journal of Audiology, 8, 361-370.
55. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978). Early selective attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42, 313-329.
56. Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24, 375-425.
57. Numminen, J., Salmelin, R., & Hari, R. (1999). Subject's own speech reduces reactivity of the human auditory cortex. Neuroscience Letters, 265, 119-122.
58. O'Brien, P. J., & Stuart, A. (2001). The effect of auditory stimulus duration on the P300 response. Journal of Speech- Language Pathology and Audiology, 25, 19-23.
59. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
60. Onishi, S., & Davis, H. (1968). Effects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked V potentials. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 582-591.
61. Ostroff, J. M., Martin, B. A., & Boothroyd, A. (1998). Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable. Ear and Hearing, 19, 290-297.
62. Papadopoulos, K., Katemidou, E., Koutsoklenis, A., & Mouratidou, E. (2010). Differences among sighted individuals and individuals with visual impairments in word intelligibility presented via synthetic and natural speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 278-288.
63. Picton, T.W., Alain, C., Otten, L. J., Ritter, W., & Achim, A. (2000). Mismatch negativity: Different water in the same river. Audiology and Neurotology, 5, 111-139.
64. Picton, T. W., & Hillyard, S. A. (1974). Human auditory evoked potentials. II: Effects of attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 36, 191-199.
65. Ponton, C. W., Eggermont, J. J., Kwong, B., & Don, M. (2000). Maturation of human central auditory system activity: Evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 220-236.
66. Rastatter, M. P., Barrow, I. M., & Stuart, A. (2007). The effects of frequency altered feedback on reading comprehension abilities of normal and reading disordered children. Neuroscience Letters, 416, 266-271.
67. Reynolds, M. E., Isaacs-Duvall, C., & Haddox, M. L. (2002). A comparison of learning curves in natural and synthesized speech comprehension. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 802-810.
68. Roring, R. W., Hines, F. G., & Charness, N. (2007). Age differences in identifying words in synthetic speech. Human Factors, 49, 25-31.
69. Roup, C. M., Wiley, T. L., Safady, S. H., & Stoppenbach, D. T. (1998). Tympanometric screening norms for adults. American Journal of Audiology, 7, 55-60.
70. Sabo, D. L., Durrant, J. D., Curtin, H., Boston, J. R., & Rood, S. (1992). Correlations of neuroanatomical measures to auditory brain stem response latencies. Ear and Hearing, 13, 213-222.
71. Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 695-703.
72. Sharma, A., & Dorman, M. F. (1999). Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voiceonset time. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1078-1083.
73. Sharma, A., & Dorman, M. F. (2000). Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2697-2703.
74. Sharma, A., Marsh, C. M., & Dorman, M. F. (2000). Relationship between N1 evoked potential morphology and the perception of voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 3030-3035.
75. Skinner, P. H., & Jones, H. C. (1968). Effects of signal duration and rise time on the auditory evoked potential. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 11, 301-306.
76. Sugg, M. J., & Polich, J. (1995). P300 from auditory stimuli: Intensity and frequency effects. Biological Psychology, 41, 255-269.
77. Thomson, J. M., Goswami, U., & Baldeweg, T. (2009). The ERP signature of sound rise time changes. Brain Research, 1254, 74-83.
78. Tiitinen, H., Sivonen, P., Alku, P., Virtanen, J., & Näätänen, R. (1999). Electromagnetic recordings reveal latency differences in speech and tone processing in humans. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 355-363.
79. Tremblay, K. L., Friesen, L., Martin, B. A., & Wright, R. (2003). Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds. Ear and Hearing, 24, 225-232.
80. Tremblay, K. L., Piskosz, M., & Souza, P. (2003). Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 1332-1343.
81. Uppenkamp, S., Johnsrude, I. S., Norris, D., Marslen- Wilson, W., & Patterson, R. D. (2006). Locating the initial stages of speech-sound processing in the human cortex. NeuroImage, 31, 1284-1296.
82. Vaughan, H. G., Jr., & Ritter, W. (1970). The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human scalp. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 28, 360-367.
83. Wagenaar, W. A. (1969). Note on the construction of digrambalanced Latin squares. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 384-386.
84. Woods, D. L., & Elmasian, R. (1986). The habituation of eventrelated potentials to speech sounds and tones. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 65, 447-459.
85. Whiting, K. A., Martin, B. A., & Stapells, D. R. (1998). The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. Ear and Hearing, 19, 218-231.