Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 1078-1083

  Sharma, Anu ^a   Dorman, Michael F ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VOICE;

ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VOICE;

EID: 0032800227     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.428048     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aaltonen, O., Niemi, P., Nyrke, T., and Tuhkanen, M. (1987). "Event-related brain potentials and the perception of a phonetic continuum," Biol. Psychol. 24, 197-207.
2. Adams, C., Molfese, D., and Betz, J. (1987). "Electrophysiological correlates of categorical speech perception for voicing contrasts in dogs," Dev. Neuropsychol, 3, 175-189.
3. Csepe, V. (1995). "On the origin and development of the Mismatch Negativity," Ear Hear. 16, 91-104.
4. Eggermont, J. (1995). "Representation of a voice-onset time continuum in primary auditory cortex of the cat." J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 911-920.
5. Gutherie, D., and Buchwald, J. (1991). "Significance of testing difference potentials," Psychophysiology 28, 240-244.
6. Harnad, S. (1987). Categorical Perception (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
7. Kaukaranta, E., Hari, R., and Lounasmaa, O. (1987). "Responses of the human auditory cortex to vowel onset after fricative consonants," Exp. Brain Res. 69, 19-23.
8. Kewley-Port, D., Watson, C., and Foyle, D. (1988). "Auditory temporal acuity in relation to category boundaries: Speech and nonspeech stimuli," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69, 1133-1145.
9. Kraus, N., McGee, T., Sharma, A., and Carrell, T. (1995). "Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination," Ear Hear. 16, 19-37.
10. Kraus, N., McGee, T., Sharma, A., Carrell, T., and Nicol, T. (1992). "Mismatch negativity event-related potential elicited by speech stimuli," Ear Hear. 13, 158-164.
11. Kuhl, P., and Miller, J. (1975). "Speech perception by the chinchilla: Voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants," Science 190, 69-72.
12. Kuhl, P., and Miller, J. (1978). "Speech perception by the chinchilla: Identification functions for synthetic VOT stimuli," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 905-917.
13. Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Kinney, J. A., and Lane, H. (1961). "The discrimination of relative onset-time of components of certain speech and non-speech patterns," J. Exp. Psychol. 61, 379.
14. Maiste, A., Wiens, A., Hunt, M., and Picton, T. (1995). "Event-related potentials and the categorical perception of speech sounds," Ear Hear. 16, 68-90.
15. McGee, T., Kraus, N., and Nicol, T. (1997). "Is there really a mismatch negativity? An assessment of methods for determining response validity in individual subjects," Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 104, 359-368.
16. McGee, T., Kraus, N., Nicol, T., and Carrell, T. (1996). "Acoustic elements of speech-like stimuli are reflected in surface recorded responses over the guinea pig temporal lobe," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 3606-3614.
17. Mofese, D., and Molfese, V. (1979). "VOT distinctions in infants: Learned or innate?," in Studies in Neurolinguistics, edited by H. A. Whitaker and H. Whitaker (Academic, New York).
18. Morse, P., Molfese, D., Burger-Judisch, L., and Hans, L. (1987). "Categorical perception for voicing contrasts in normal and lead-treated Rhesus monkeys: Electrophysiological correlates," Brain. Lang. 30, 63-80.
19. Nätäänen, R. (1992). Attention and Brain Function (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).
20. Nätäänen, R., and Picton, T. (1987). "The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and analysis of the component structure." Psychophysiology 24, 375-425.
21. Pisoni, D. (1977). "Identification and discrimination of the relative onset of two tone components: Implications for voicing perception in stops," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 1352-1361.
22. Sams, M., Aulanko, R., Aaltonen, O., and Nätäänen, R. (1990). "Event-related potentials to infrequent changes in synthesized phonetic stimuli," J. Cognitive Neuroscience 2, 344-357.
23. Sharma, A., Kraus, N., McGee, T., Carrell, T., and Nicol, T. (1993). "Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential," Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 88, 64-71.
24. Sinex, D. (1993). "Simulation of neural responses that underlie speech discrimination," in Neural Systems: Analysis and Modeling, edited by F. Eeckman (Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA), pp. 307-313.
25. Sinex, D., and McDonald, L. (1989). "Synchronized discharge rate representation of voice-onset time in the chinchilla auditory nerve," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 1995-2004.
26. Sinex, D., and Narayan, S. (1994). "Auditory-nerve fiber representation of temporal cues to voicing in word-medial stop consonants," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 897-903.
27. Sinex, D., McDonald, L., and Mott, J. B. (1991). "Neural correlates of nonmonotonic temporal acuity for voice-onset time," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90, 2441-2449.
28. Soli, S. (1983). "The role of spectral differences in the discrimination of voice-onset time differences," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73, 2150-2165.
29. Steinschneider, M., Schroeder, C. E., Arezzo, J. C., and Vaughan, Jr., H. G. (1994). "Speech-evoked activity in primary auditory cortex: Effects of voice onset time," Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 92, 30-43.
30. Steinschneider, M., Schroeder, C., Arezzo, J., and Vaughan, Jr., H. (1995). "Physiological correlates of the voice onset time boundary in the primary auditory cortex (A1) of the awake monkey: Temporal response pattern," Brain. Lang. 48, 326-340.
31. Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1982). "On the dissociation of the auditory and phonetic perception," in The Representation of Speech in the Peripheral Auditory System, edited by R. Carlson and B. Granstrom (Elsevier, Amsterdam), pp. 9-26.
32. Studdert-Kennedy, M., Liberman, A., Harris, K. S., and Cooper, F. (1970). "Motor theory of speech perception: A reply to Lane's critical review," Psychol. Rev. 77, 234-249.