A scale distortion theory of anchoring

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 141, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 124-133

  Frederick, Shane W ^a   Mochon, Daniel ^b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Anchoring; Context effects; Mental representation; Response scales; Scaling effects

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PERCEPTION;

EID: 84859368649     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024006     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2003). "Coherent arbitrariness": Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 73-105. doi:10.1162/00335530360535153
2. Bevan, W., & Turner, E. D. (1964). Assimilation and contrast in the estimation of number. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 458-462. doi:10.1037/h0041141
3. Biernat, M., Manis, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Simultaneous assim-ilation and contrast effects in judgments of self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 254-269. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.254
4. Biernat, M., Manis, M., & Nelson, T. E. (1991). Stereotypes and standards of judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 485-499. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.485
5. Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Schwartz, J. A., & Bergus, G. R. (2007). The influence of irrelevant anchors on the judgments and choices of doctors and patients. Medical Decision Making, 27, 203-211. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06298595
6. Brown, D. R. (1953). Stimulus-similarity and the anchoring of subjective scales. American Journal of Psychology, 66, 199-214. doi:10.2307/ 1418726
7. Campbell, D. T., Lewis, N. A., & Hunt, W. A. (1958). Context effects with judgmental language that is absolute, extensive, and extra-experimentally anchored. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 220-228. doi:10.1037/h0045310
8. Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1994). The limits of anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 223-242. doi:10.1002/bdm .3960070402
9. Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 115-153. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2841
10. Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 120-138): New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11. Critcher, C. R., & Gilovich, T. (2008). Incidental environmental anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 241-251. doi:10.1002/ bdm.586
12. Di Lollo, V. (1964). Contrast effects in the judgment of lifted weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 383-387. doi:10.1037/ h0042094
13. Englich, B., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). Sentencing under uncertainty: Anchoring effects in the courtroom. Journal of Applied Social Psychol-ogy, 31, 1535-1551. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02687.x
14. Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological Science, 12, 391-396. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00372
15. Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Are adjustments insufficient? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 447-460. doi:10.1177/ 0146167203261889
16. Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2005). When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: Differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 199-212. doi:10.1002/bdm.495
17. Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006). The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic. Why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychological Science, 17, 311-318. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01704.x
18. Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory: An experimental and system-atic approach to behavior. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
19. Hunt, W. A. (1941). Anchoring effects in judgment. American Journal of Psychology, 54, 395-403. doi:10.2307/1417684
20. Jacowitz, K. E., & Kahneman, D. (1995). Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1161-1166. doi:10.1177/01461672952111004
21. Kahneman, D., & Knetsch, J. L. (1993). Anchoring or shallow inference: The effect of format. Unpublished manuscript.
22. Kahneman, D., Ritov, I., & Schkade, D. A. (1999). Economic preferences or attitude expressions? An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 203-235. doi:10.1023/A: 1007835629236
23. Kahneman, D., Schkade, D. A., & Sunstein, C. R. (1998). Shared outrage and erratic awards: The psychology of punitive damages. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 16, 49-86. doi:10.1023/A:1007710408413
24. Krantz, D. L., & Campbell, D. T. (1961). Separating perceptual and linguistic effects of context shifts upon absolute judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 35-42. doi:10.1037/h0040386
25. Lynch, J. G., Chakravarti, D., & Mitra, A. (1991). Contrast effects in consumer judgments: Changes in mental representation or in the anchor-ing of rating scales. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 284-297. doi:10.1086/209260
26. Mochon, D., & Frederick, S. (2011). Anchoring in sequential judgments (Working paper). New Haven, CT: Yale University.
27. Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mech-anisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472-489. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.472
28. Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (1999). Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 136-164. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1998.1364
29. Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2000a). The "relative self": Informational and judgmental consequences of comparative self-evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 23-38. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.23
30. Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2000b). The use of category and exemplar knowledge in the solution of anchoring tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1038-1052. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1038
31. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and conse-quences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-469. doi:10.2307/3150499
32. Oppenheimer, D. M., LeBoeuf, R. A., & Brewer, N. T. (2008). Anchors aweigh: A demonstration of cross-modality anchoring and magnitude priming. Cognition, 106, 13-26. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.008
33. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49, 41-50. doi:10.2307/1251430
34. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 12-40.
35. Parducci, A. (1965). Category judgment: A range-frequency model. Psychological Review, 72, 407-418. doi:10.1037/h0022602
36. Ross, J., & Di Lollo, V. (1968). Category scales and contrast effects with lifted weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 547-550. doi: 10.1037/h0026622
37. Ross, J., & Di Lollo, V. (1971). Judgment and response in magnitude estimation. Psychological Review, 78, 515-527. doi:10.1037/h0031784
38. Sherif, M., Taub, D., & Hovland, C. I. (1958). Assimilation and contrast effects of anchoring stimuli on judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 150-155. doi:10.1037/h0048784
39. Sherman, S. J., Ahlm, K., Berman, L., & Lynn, S. (1978). Contrast effects and their relationship to subsequent behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 340-350. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(78)90030-6
40. Stevens, S. S. (1958). Adaptation-level vs. the relativity of judgment. American Journal of Psychology, 71, 633-646. doi:10.2307/1420322
41. Strack, F., & Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 437-446. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.437
42. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974, September 27). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
43. Upshaw, H. S. (1978). Social influence on attitudes and on anchoring of congeneric attitude scales. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 327-339. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(78)90029-X
44. Upshaw, H. S. (1984). Output processes in judgment. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 237-256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Wilson, T. D., Houston, C. E., Etling, K. M., & Brekke, N. (1996). A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 387-402. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.4.387
46. Wong, K. F. E., & Kwong, J. Y. Y. (2000). Is 7300 m equal to 7.3 km? Same semantics but different anchoring effects. Organizational Behav-ior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 314-333. doi:10.1006/ obhd.2000.2900
47. Woodruff, R. B., Cadotte, E. R., & Jenkins, R. L. (1983). Modeling consumer satisfactions processes using experience-based norms. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 296-304. doi:10.2307/3151833