Treating policy brokers seriously: Evidence from the climate policy

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 319-346

  Ingold, Karin ^a   Varone, Frédéric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859341219     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: 14779803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mur035     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Arce, Daniel. 2001. Leadership and the aggregation of international collective action. Oxford Economic Papers 53:114-37.
2. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.
3. Beach, Derek. 2004. The unseen hand in treaty reform negotiations: The role and influence of the Council Secretariat. Journal of European Public Policy 11:408-39.
4. Charles Brecher, Caitlyn Brazill, Beth C. Weitzman, and Diana Silver. 2010. Understanding the Political Context of New Policy Issues: the Use of the Advocacy Coalition Model in the Case of Expanded After-School Programs. Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory 20(2):235-255.
5. Christopoulos, Dimitris. 2008. Political entrepreneurs: Network structure and power. www.psa.ac.uk/journals/pdf/5/2008/Christopoulos.pdf (accessed July 11, 2011).
6. Elliott, Christopher. 2000. Forest certification. A policy perspective Thesis Series. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
7. 2. Berne, Switzerland: Archives fédérales suisses.
8. Fischer, Alex. 2003. Die Auswirkungen der Internationalisierung/ Europäisierung auf den Schweizer Entscheidungsprozess. Lausanne, Switzerland: IDEHAP.
9. Freeman, Linton C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: I. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1:215-39.
10. Gerlak, Andrea, and Tanya Heikkila. 2011. Building a theory of learning in collaboratives: Evidence from the everglades restoration program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory doi: 10.1093/jopart/muq089 First published online: February 9, 2011.
11. Goldfinch, Shaun, and Paul Hart. 2003. Leadership and institutional reform: Engineering macroeconomic policy change in Australia. Governance 16:235-70. (Pubitemid 36776950)
12. Holcombe, Randall. 2002. Political entrepreneurship and the democratic allocation of economic resources. The Review of Austrian Economics 15:143-59.
13. Ingold, Karin. 2008. Les mécanismes de décision: Le cas de la politique climatique Suisse. Zürich, Switzerland: Politikanalyen, Rüegger.
14. -. 2010. Apprendre pour le futur: Une analyse de la politique climatique suisse. Swiss Political Science Review 16:43-76.
15. Ingold, Karin. 2011. Network structures within policy processes: Coalitions, power and brokerage in Swiss climate policy. Policy Studies Journal 39(3):435-59.
16. James, Thomas E., and Paul D. Jorgersen. 2009. Policy knowledge, policy formulation, and change. Revisting a foundational question. The Policy Studies Journal 37:141-62.
17. Jegen, Maja. 2003. Energiepolitische Vernetzung in der Schweiz Thèse no. 516, Univ. de Genève
18. Jenkins-Smith, Hank, and Gilbert St. Clair. 1993. The politics of offshore energy: Empirically testing the advocacy coalition framework. In Policy change and learning, eds. Paul A. Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith, 149-76. Boulder, CO: Westview.
19. Jobert, Bruno, and Pierre Muller. 1987. L'Etat en action. Politiques publiques et corporatismes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
20. Kingdon, John. 1995. Agenda, alternatives and public policies, 2nd ed. New York: Harper Collins.
21. Knoke, David, Franz U. Pappi, Jeffry Broadbent, and Yutaka Tsujinaka. 1996. Comparing policy networks-labour politics in the US, Germany and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
22. Kiser, Larry, and Elinor Ostrom. The three worlds of action: A meta-theoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. In Strategies of political inquiry ed. Elinor Ostrom, 179-222. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23. Kriesi, Hanspeter, and Maya Jegen. 2000. Decision-making in the Swiss energy policy elite. Journal of Public Policy 20:21-53. (Pubitemid 30432614)
24. -. 2001. The Swiss energy policy elite: The actor constellation of a policy domain in transition. European Journal of Political Research 39:251-87.
25. Kübler, Daniel. 2001. Understanding policy change with the advocacy coalition framework: An application to Swiss drug policy. Journal of European Public Policy 8:623-41.
26. Kuhnert, Stephan. 2001. An evolutionary theory of collective action: Schumpeterian entrepreneurship for the common good. Constitutional Political Economy 12:13-29. (Pubitemid 33808082)
27. Lehmann, Luzia, and Stefan Rieder. Wissenschaftliches Wissen in Politischer Auseinandersetzung, Bericht 34. Bern: SATW.
28. Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
29. Lü thi, Ruth. 2007. The parliament. In: Handbooks of Swiss politics, eds. Ulrich Klö ti, Peter Knoepfel, Hanspeter Kriesi, Wolf Linder, Yannis Papadopoulos, and Pascal Sciarini, 121-44. NZZ.
30. Meijerink, Sander. 2005. Understanding policy stability and change. The interplay of advocacy coalitions and epistemic communities, windows of opportunity, and Dutch coastal flooding policy 1945-2003. Journal of European Public Policy 12:1060-77. (Pubitemid 41539375)
31. Mintrom, Michael, and Phillipa Norman. 2009. Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal 37:649-67.
32. Mintrom, Michael, and Sandra Vergari. 1996. Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change. Policy Studies Journal 24:420-34.
33. Nagel, Peter. 2006. Policy games and venue-shopping: Working the stakeholder interface to broker policy change in rehabilitation services. Australian Journal of Public Administration 65:3-16. (Pubitemid 44878887)
34. Neidhart, Leonhard. 1970. Plebiszit und pluralitäre Demokratie. Eine Analyze der Funktion des schweizerischen Gesetzesreferendums. Bern, Switzerland: Francke.
35. Nohrstedt, Daniel. 2009a. External shocks and policy change: Three Mile Island and Swedish nuclear energy policy. Journal of European Public Policy 12:1041-59. (Pubitemid 41539374)
36. -. 2009b. Do advocacy coalitions matter? Crisis and change in Swedish nuclear energy policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11.
37. Nohrstedt, Daniel, and Christopher M. Weible. 2010. The logic of policy change after crisis: Proximity and subsystem interaction. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1 (2): 1-32.
38. Ostrom, Elinor. 2005. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
39. -. 2007. Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In: Theories of the policy process, 2nd ed., ed. Paul A. Sabatier. Boulder, CO: Westview.
40. Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2001. How does direct democracy matter? The impact of referendum votes upon politics and policy-making. West European Politics 24:35-58. (Pubitemid 32546228)
41. Sabatier, Paul A. 1988. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences 21:129-68.
42. -. 1993. Advocacy-Koalitionen, Policy-Wandel und Policy-Lernen: Eine Alternative zur Phasenheuristik. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderaus 24:116-48.
43. Sabatier, Paul A., and Christopher M. Weible. 2007. The advocacy coalition framework. Innovations and clarifications. In Theories of the policy process, 2nd ed., ed. Paul A. Sabatier. Boulder, CO: Westview.
44. Sabatier, Paul A., and Hank Jenkins-Smith. 1993. Policy change and learning. An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.
45. Sabatier, Paul, Susan Hunter, and Susan McLaughlin. 1987. The devil shift: Perceptions and misperceptions of opponents. Political Research Quarterly 40:449-76.
46. Schärlig, Andreas. 1985. Décider sur plusieurs critères-Panorama de l'aide à la décision multicritère. Lausanne, Switzerland: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.
47. Schneider, Mark, and Paul Teske. 1992. Towards a theory of the political entrepreneur: Evidence from local government. American Political Science Review 86:734-47.
48. Schlager, Edella. 1995. Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Sciences 28:243-70.
49. Schumpeter, Joseph. 1961. A theory of economic development. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
50. Sciarini, Pascal. 1994. Le système politique suisse face à la Communauté européenne et au GATT: Le castest de la politique agricole PhD diss. no. 394, Université de Genève.
51. Stokman, Frans. 2004. What binds us when with whom? Extended key notes at the Sunbelt XXIV, Slovenia.
52. Tallberg, Jonas. 2004. The power of the presidency: Brokerage, efficiency and distribution in EU negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies 42:990-1022.
53. Thalmann, Philippe, and Andrea Baranzini. 2006. Gradual introduction of coercive instruments in climate policy. Cahier de recherche 06/6/1. Geneva, Switzerland: Haute école de gestion de Genève.
54. Tsebelis, George. 1995. Decision making in political system. Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, mutlicameralism, and mutlipartyism. British Journal of Political Science 25:289-325.
55. -. 2002. Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
56. Varone, Frédéric, and Bernard Aebischer. 2001. Energy efficiency: The challenges of policy design. Energy Policy 29:615-9.
57. Varone, Frédéric, Christine Rothmayr, and Eric Montpetit. 2006. Regulating biomedicine in Europe and North America. A qualitative- comparative analysis. European Journal of Political Research 45:317-43. (Pubitemid 43536600)
58. Vatter, Adrian. 2009. Lijphart expanded: Three dimensions of democracy in advanced OECD countries? European Political Science Review 1:125-54.
59. Walgrave, Stefaan, and Frédéric Varone. 2008. Punctuated equilibrium and agenda-setting: Bringing parties back in policy change after the Dutroux crisis in Belgium. Governance 23:365-95.
60. Wasserman, Stanley, and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social network analysis: Method and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
61. Weible, Christopher. 2007. An advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis: Understanding the political context of California Marine Protected Area Policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17:95-117.
62. Weible, Christopher M., Paul A. Sabatier, and Kelly McQueen. 2009. Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal 37:121-40.
63. Zachariadis, Nikolaos. 2007. The multiple streams framework: Structure, limitations, prospects. In: Theories of the policy process, 2nd ed, ed. Paul A. Sabatier. Boulder, CO: Westview.