Regulating biomedicine in Europe and North America: A qualitative comparative analysis

European Journal of Political Research

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 317-343

  Varone, Frédéric ^a   Rothmayr, Christine ^b   Montpetit, Eric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645679561     PISSN: 03044130     EISSN: 14756765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00300.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bachrach, P. & Baratz, M.S. (1963). Decisions and non-decisions: An analytical framework. American Political Science Review 57: 632-642.
2. Bleiklie, I., Goggin, M. & Rothmayr, C. (eds) (2004). Comparative biomedical policy: Governing assisted reproductive technologies. London: Routledge.
3. Blank, R.H. &. Hines, S.M. Jr (2001). Biology and political science. London/New York: Routledge.
4. Bobrow, D.B. & Dryzek, J.S. (1987). Policy analysis by design. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
5. Castles, F.G. (2000). Federalism, fiscal decentralization and economic performance. In U. Wachendorfer-Schmidt (ed.), Federalism and political performance. London: Routledge.
6. DeMeur, G. & Rihoux, B. (2002). L'analyse quali-quantitative comparée. Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia Bruylant.
7. Hammond, T.H. & Butler, C.K. (2003). Some complex answers to the simple question 'Do institutions matter?' Policy choice and policy change in presidential and parliamentary systems. Journal of Theoretical Politics 15: 145-200.
8. Harrison, K. (1996). Passing the buck: Federalism and Canadian environmental policy. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
9. Hassenteufel, P. (1997). Les médecins face à l'Etat: Une comparaison européenne. Paris: Presses de science po.
10. Heidenheimer, A.J., Heclo, H. & Teich Adams, C. (1990). Comparative public policy: The politics of social choice in America, Europe and Japan, 3rd edn. New York: St Martin's Press.
11. Keman, H. (2000). Federalism and policy performance: A conceptual and empirical inquiry. In U. Wachendorfer-Schmidt (ed.), Federalism and political performance. London: Routledge.
12. Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13. Linder, S. & Peter, G.B. (1984). From social theory to policy design. Journal of Public Policy 4: 237-259.
14. Marsh, D. & Rhodes, R.A.W. (1992). Policy communities and issues network: Beyond typology. In Policy networks in British government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
15. May, P.J. (1991). Reconsidering policy design: Policies and publics. Journal of Public Policy 11: 187-206.
16. Nielsen, H., Jelsoe, E. & Öhman, S. (2002) The structure of public perceptions. In M.W. Bauer & G. Gaskell (eds), Biotechnology: The making of a global controversy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics 45: 595-628.
18. Ragin, C.C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
19. Rochefort, D.A. & Cobb, W.C. (1994). The politics of problem definition. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
20. Rothmayr, C. & Varone, F. (2002). 'Biopolitics' and the missing political scientists: Introduction debate. Swiss Political Science Review 8:129-134.
21. Rothmayr, C., Varone, F. & Montpetit, E. (2003). Does federalism matter for biopolicies? Switzerland in comparative perspective. Swiss Political Science Review 9:109-136.
22. Rothmayr, C. et al. (2004). Comparing policy design across countries: What accounts for variation in ART policy? In I. Bleiklie, M. Goggin & C. Rothmayr (eds), Comparative biomedical policy: Governing assisted reproductive technologies. London: Routledge.
23. Salter, B. (2000). Medical regulation and public trust: An international review. London: Kings Fund.
24. Scharpf, F.W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
25. Schmidt, M.G. (1996). When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research 30:155-183.
26. Schneider, A.L. & Ingram, H.M. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
27. Schön, D.A. & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
28. Timmermans, A. (2001). Arenas as institutional sites for policymaking: Patterns and effects in comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Prac-tice 3: 311-327.
29. Tsebelis, G. (1995). Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipaitism. British Journal of Political Science 25: 289-325.
30. Tsebelis, G. (1999). Veto players and institutional analysis. Governance 13: 441-474.