Genome-wide metabolic network reconstruction of the picoalga Ostreococcus

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 2353-2362

  Krumholz, Elias W ^a   Yang, Hong ^a   Weisenhorn, Pamela ^a,b   Henry, Christopher S ^c   Libourel, Igor G L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b Department of Ecology Evolution and Behavior ^*  (United States)

^c ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gap filling; metabolic network; network reconstruction; Ostreococcus

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; GREEN ALGA; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GENOME;

BIOMASS; CHLOROPHYTA; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENOME, PLANT; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; PHYLOGENY;

OSTREOCOCCUS; OSTREOCOCCUS TAURI;

EID: 84859319791     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/err407     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Boyle NR, Morgan JA. 2009. Flux balance analysis of primary metabolism in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. BMC Systems Biology 3, 4.
2. Chang RL, Ghamsari L, Manichaikul A, et al. 2011. Metabolic network reconstruction of Chlamydomonas offers insight into light-driven algal metabolism. Molecular Systems Biology 7, 518.
3. Chretiennot-Dinet MJ, Courties C, Vaquer A, Neveux J, Claustre H, Lautier J, Machado MC. 1995. A new marine picoeucaryote-Ostreococcus tauri Gen et Sp-Nov (Chlorophyta, Prasinophyceae). Phycologia 34, 285-292.
4. Christian N, May P, Kempa S, Handorf T, Ebenhoh O. 2009. An integrative approach towards completing genome-scale metabolic networks. Molecular Biosystems 5, 1889-1903.
5. Ciccarelli FD, Doerks T, von Mering C, Creevey CJ, Snel B, Bork P. 2006. Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 311, 1283-1287. (Pubitemid 43334717)
6. Corellou F, Schwartz C, Motta JP, Djouani-Tahri E, Sanchez F, Bouget FY. 2009. Clocks in the green lineage: comparative functional analysis of the circadian architecture of the picoeukaryote Ostreococcus. The Plant Cell 21, 3436-3449.
7. Courties C, Vaquer A, Troussellier M, Lautier J, Chretiennot-Dinet MJ, Neveux J, Machado C, Claustre H. 1994. Smallest eukaryotic organism. Nature 370, 255.
8. Dal'Molin CGD, Quek LE, Palfreyman RW, Brumbley SM, Nielsen LK. 2010. AraGEM, a genome-scale reconstruction of the primary metabolic network in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 152, 579-589.
9. Derelle E, Ferraz C, Rombauts S, et al. 2006. Genome analysis of the smallest free-living eukaryote Ostreococcus tauri unveils many unique features. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103, 11647-11652. (Pubitemid 44182505)
10. Faria J, Rocha M, Stevens R, Henry C. 2010. Analysis of the effect of reversibility constraints on the predictions of genome-scale metabolic models. In: Rocha M, Riverola F, Shatkay H, Corchado J, eds. Advances in Bioinformatics. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 209-215.
11. Flamholz A, Noor E, Bar-Even A, Milo R. 2011. eQuilibrator-the biochemical thermodynamics calculator. Nucleic Acids Research doi:10.1093/nar/gkr874.
12. Forsythe RG, Karp PD, Mavrovouniotis ML. 1997. Estimation of equilibrium constants using automated group contribution methods. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 13, 537-543. (Pubitemid 27480213)
13. Grimsley N, Pequin B, Bachy C, Moreau H, Piganeau G. 2010. Cryptic sex in the smallest eukaryotic marine green alga. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27, 47-54.
14. Henry CS, DeJongh M, Best AA, Frybarger PM, Linsay B, Stevens RL. 2010. High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models. Nature Biotechnology 28, 977-982.
15. Henry CS, Overbeek R, Xia F, et al. 2011. Connecting genotype to phenotype in the era of high-throughput sequencing. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects 1810, 967-977.
16. Jankowski MD, Henry CS, Broadbelt LJ, Hatzimanikatis V. 2008. Group contribution method for thermodynamic analysis of complex metabolic networks. Biophysical Journal 95, 1487-1499.
17. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Hattori M, oki-Kinoshita KF, Itoh M, Kawashima S, Katayama T, Araki M, Hirakawa M. 2006. From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Research 34, D354-D357.
18. Keating SM, Bornstein BJ, Finney A, Hucka M. 2006. SBMLToolbox: an SBML toolbox for MATLAB users. Bioinformatics 22, 1275-1277. (Pubitemid 43779023)
19. Koonin EV, Wolf YI. 2008. Genomics of bacteria and archaea: the emerging dynamic view of the prokaryotic world. Nucleic Acids Research 36, 6688-6719.
20. Kyrpides NC. 2009. Fifteen years of microbial genomics: meeting the challenges and fulfilling the dream. Nature Biotechnology 27, 627-632.
21. Larkin M, Blackshields G, Brown N, et al. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23, 2947-2948. (Pubitemid 350162903)
22. Mavrovouniotis ML. 1991. Estimation of standard Gibbs energy changes of biotransformations. Journal of Biological Chemistry 266, 14440-14445. (Pubitemid 21907522)
23. May P, Christian JO, Kempa S, Walther D. 2009. ChlamyCyc: an integrative systems biology database and web-portal for Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. BMC Genomics 10, 209.
24. May P, Wienkoop S, Kempa S, et al. 2008. Metabolomics-and proteomics-assisted genome annotation and analysis of the draft metabolic network of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Genetics 179, 157-166.
25. Merchant SS, Prochnik SE, Vallon O, et al. 2007. The Chlamydomonas genome reveals the evolution of key animal and plant functions. Science 318, 245-250.
26. Orth JD, Palsson BØ. 2010. Systematizing the generation of missing metabolic knowledge. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 107, 403-412.
27. Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson BØ. 2010. What is flux balance analysis? Nature Biotechnology 28, 245-248.
28. Palenik B, Grimwood J, Aerts A, et al. 2007. The tiny eukaryote Ostreococcus provides genomic insights into the paradox of plankton speciation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104, 7705-7710. (Pubitemid 47185970)
29. Poolman MG, Miguet L, Sweetlove LJ, Fell DA. 2009. A genome-scale metabolic model of Arabidopsis and some of its properties. Plant Physiology 151, 1570-1581.
30. Posada D. 2008. Model Test: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25, 1253-1256.
31. Reed JL, Patel TR, Chen KH, Joyce AR, Applebee MK, Herring CD, Bui OT, Knight EM, Fong SS, Palsson BO. 2006. Systems approach to refining genome annotation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103, 17480-17484. (Pubitemid 44788994)
32. Schellenberger J, Que R, Fleming RMT, et al. 2011. Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0. Nature Protocols 6, 1290-1307.
33. Smith TF, Waterman MS. 1981. Identification of common molecular subsequences. Journal of Molecular Biology 147, 195-197.
34. Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Ideker T. 2011. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics 27, 431-432.
35. Wang X, Wang H, Wang J, et al. 2011. The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species. Brassica rapa. Nature Genetics 43, 1035-1039.
36. Zhu F, Massana R, Not F, Marie D, Vaulot D. 2005. Mapping of picoeucaryotes in marine ecosystems with quantitative PCR of the 18S rRNA gene. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 52, 79-92. (Pubitemid 40261301)
37. Zwickl D. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Dissertation: University of Texas, Austin.