Replacing gasoline with corn ethanol results in significant environmental problem-shifting

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 3671-3678

  Yang, Yi ^c   Bae, Junghan ^a   Kim, Junbeum ^b   Suh, Sangwon ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE TROYES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES; CORN PRODUCTION; CORN-ETHANOL; ENERGY INDEPENDENCE; GHG EMISSION; LAND-USE CHANGE; LIFE-CYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY; WATER SCARCITY; WIDE SPECTRUM;

ETHANOL; EUTROPHICATION; GASOLINE; GREENHOUSE GASES;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

ALCOHOL; GASOLINE;

AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ETHANOL; EUTROPHICATION; GREENHOUSE GAS; IRRIGATION; LAND USE CHANGE; MAIZE; WATER AVAILABILITY;

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EUTROPHICATION; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND USE; MAIZE;

ENVIRONMENT; ETHANOL; GASOLINE; UNITED STATES; VEHICLE EMISSIONS; ZEA MAYS;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84859295385     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es203641p     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. FAPRI. World Agricultural Outlook Database; Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute: Ames, IA, 2010; http://www.fapri.org/tools/outlook.aspx.
2. Wang, M.; Wu, M.; Huo, H. Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of different corn ethanol plant types Environ. Res. Lett. 2007, 2, 024001
3. Pimentel, D. Ethanol fuels: Energy balance, economics, and environmental impacts are negative Nat. Resour. Res 2003, 12 (2) 127-134
4. USDA. The Energy Balance of Corn Ethanol, An update; U.S. Department of Agriculture: Wasthington, DC, 2002; http://www.transportation.anl.gov/pdfs/AF/ 265.pdf.
5. Hill, J.; Nelson, E.; Tilman, D.; Polasky, S.; Tiffany, D. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U. S. A. 2006, 103 (30) 11206
6. Farrell, A.; Plevin, R.; Turner, B.; Jones, A.; OHare, M.; Kammen, D. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals Science 2006, 311 (5760) 506
7. Liska, A.; Yang, H.; Bremer, V.; Klopfenstein, T.; Walters, D.; Erickson, G.; Cassman, K. Improvements in life cycle energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of corn ethanol J. Ind. Ecol. 2009, 13 (1) 58-74
8. Plevin, R. Modeling corn ethanol and climate J. Ind. Ecol. 2009, 13 (4) 495-507
9. Searchinger, T.; Heimlich, R.; Houghton, R.; Dong, F.; Elobeid, A.; Fabiosa, J.; Tokgoz, S.; Hayes, D.; Yu, T. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change Science 2008, 319 (5867) 1238
10. Fargione, J.; Hill, J.; Tilman, D.; Polasky, S.; Hawthorne, P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt Science 2008, 319 (5867) 1235
11. Liska, A.; Perrin, R. Indirect land use emissions in the life cycle of biofuels: Regulations vs science Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref. 2009, 3 (3) 318-328
12. Mathews, J.; Tan, H. Biofuels and indirect land use change effects: The debate continues Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref. 2009, 3 (3) 305-317
13. Babcock, B. Measuring unmeasurable land-use changes from biofuels Iowa Agric. Rev. 2009, 15
14. Kim, H.; Kim, S.; Dale, B. Biofuels, land use change, and greenhouse gas emissions: Some unexplored variables Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (3) 961-967
15. Finnveden, G.; Hauschild, M.; Ekvall, T.; Guinée, J.; Heijungs, R.; Hellweg, S.; Koehler, A.; Pennington, D.; Suh, S. Recent developments in life cycle assessment J Environ. Manage. 2009, 91 (1) 1-21
16. Keeney, D. Ethanol USA Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 43 (1) 8-11
17. Chiu, Y.; Walseth, B.; Suh, S. Water embodied in bioethanol in the United States Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (8) 2688-2692
18. Von Blottnitz, H.; Curran, M. A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective J. Cleaner Prod. 2007, 15 (7) 607-619
19. Guinee, J.; Heijungs, R.; Huppes, G.; Zamagni, A.; Masoni, P.; Buonamici, R.; Ekvall, T.; Rydberg, T. Life cycle assessment: Past, present, and future Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 90-96
20. Miller, S.; Landis, A.; Theis, T. Use of monte carlo analysis to characterize nitrogen fluxes in agroecosystems Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40 (7) 2324-2332
21. USDA. Agricultural Chemical Usage 2005 Field Crops Summary; US Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, 2006.
22. Wang, M. The greenhouse gases, regulated emissions, and energy use in transportation (GREET) model, version 1.5; Argonne National Laboratory, Department of Energy: Chicago, IL, 1999.
23. Frischknecht, R.; Rebitzer, G. The ecoinvent database system: A comprehensive web-based LCA database J Cleaner Prod. 2005, 13 (13-14) 1337-1343
24. NREL. U.S. Life-Cycle Inventory, v. 1.6.0; National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO, 2008; http://www.nrel.gov/lci/.
25. Suh, S.; Lenzen, M.; Treloar, G.; Hondo, H.; Horvath, A.; Huppes, G.; Jolliet, O.; Klann, U.; Krewitt, W.; Moriguchi, Y. System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38 (3) 657-664
26. Suh, S. Developing a sectoral environmental database for input-output analysis: The comprehensive environmental data archive of the US Econ. Sys. Res. 2005, 17 (4) 449-469
27. Ogle, S.; Del Grosso, S.; Adler, P.; Parton, W. Soil nitrous oxide emissions with crop production for biofuel: Implications for greenhouse gas mitigation. In The Lifecycle Carbon Footprint of Biofuels; Outlaw, J. L.; Ernests, D. P., Eds.; Farm Foundation: Oak Brook, 2008; pp 68.
28. USDA-NRCS. Model Simulation of Soil Loss, Nutrient Loss, and Change in Soil Organic Carbon Associated with Crop Production; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service: Wastington, DC, 2006.
29. ISO. ISO14040, Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
30. Gloria, T.; Lippiatt, B.; Cooper, J. Life cycle impact assessment weights to support environmentally preferable purchasing in the United States Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41 (21) 7551-7557
31. USDA-ERS. Energy Use on Major Field Crops in Surveyed States; U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service: Washington, DC, 2004.
32. Aneja, V.; Nelson, D.; Roelle, P.; Walker, J.; Battye, W. Agricultural ammonia emissions and ammonium concentrations associated with aerosols and precipitation in the southeast United States J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108 (D4) 4152
33. IPCC. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme; Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES): Hayama, Japan, 2006.
34. Bare, J.; Norris, G.; Pennington, D.; McKone, T. The tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts J. Ind. Ecol. 2003, 6 (3-4) 49-78
35. USEPA. Emissions Factors & AP 42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission factors, Chapter 9: Food and Agricultural Industries; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 1995.
36. USDA-NRCS. Environmental Indicators of Pesticides Leaching and Runoff from Farm Fields; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service: Washington, DC, 2000.
37. USDA-NASS. Farm and Ranch Irrigation Survey (2008); U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service: Washington, DC, 2009.
38. 2 concentrations and water-stress, as determined from elemental analyses Field Crops Res. 1987, 17 (1) 63-74
39. McLaughlin, S.; Walsh, M. Evaluating environmental consequences of producing herbaceous crops for bioenergy Biomass Bioenergy 1998, 14 (4) 317-324
40. Mueller, S. National dry mill corn ethanol survey Biotechnol. Lett. 2008, 1-4
41. MacLean, H. L.; Spatari, S. The contribution of enzymes and process chemicals to the life cycle of ethanol Environ. Res. Lett. 2009, 4, 1
42. Guinee, J. B.; Gorree, M.; Heijungs, R.; Huppes, G.; Kleijn, R.; de Koning, A.; van Oers, L.; Wegener Sleeswijk, A.; Suh, S.; Udo de Haes, H. A.; de Bruijn, H.; van Duin, R.; Huijbregts, M. A. J. Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards; Kluwer Academic Pubishers: Dordrecht, 2002.
43. ISO. ISO 14041, Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Goal and Scope Definition and Inventory Analysis; International Organization for Standarization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
44. Ekvall, T.; Finnveden, G. Allocation in ISO 14041 - A critical review J. Cleaner Prod. 2001, 9 (3) 197-208
45. Guinée, J. B.; Heijungs, R.; van der Voet, E. A greenhouse gas indicator for bioenergy: Some theoretical issues with practical implications Int. J. LCA 2009, 14 (4) 328-339
46. Guinée, J.; Heijungs, R.; Huppes, G. Economic allocation: Examples and derived decision tree Int. J. LCA 2004, 9 (1) 23-33
47. AgMRC. Weekly Ethanol, Distillers Grain, and Corn Prices; Agricultural Marketing Resource Center: Ames, IA, 2011.
48. Arora, S.; Wu, M.; Wang, M. Update of Distillers Grains Displacement Ratios for Corn Ethanol Life-Cycle Analysis; Center for Transportation Research Energy System Division, Argonne National Laboratory: Chicago, 2008.
49. Tursun, U. D.; Kang, S.; Onal, H.; Ouyang, Y.; Scheffran, J. Optimal biorefinery locations and transportation network for the future biofuels industry in Illinois. In Environmental and Rural Development Impacts Conference, St. Louis, Missouri; 2008; Khunna, M., Ed.; St. Louis, MO, 2008.
50. Steffen, M.; Ken, C. Determining the Land Use Impact of Two Midwestern Corn Ethanol Plants; College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2009.
51. Tilman, D.; Cassman, K. G.; Matson, P. A.; Naylor, R.; Polasky, S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices Nature 2002, 418 (6898) 671-677
52. UNEP. Towards Sustainable Production and Use of Resources: Assessing Biofuels; United Nation Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2009.
53. Plevin, R.; Jones, A.; Torn, M.; Gibbs, H. Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels indirect land use change are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 1120-1240
54. USEPA. Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2) Regulatory Impact Analysis; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2010.
55. CARB. Proposed Regulation to Implement the Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Vol. I, Staff Report: Initial Statement of Reasons; California Air Resources Board: Sacramento, CA, 2009.
56. Hertel, T. W.; Golub, A. A.; Jones, A. D.; OHare, M.; Plevin, R. J.; Kammen, D. M. Effects of US maize ethanol on global land use and greenhouse gas emissions: Estimating market-mediated responses BioSci. 2010, 60 (3) 223-231
57. 2 Emissions Due to US Corn Ethanol Production: A Comprehensive Analysis; Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University: West Lafayette, IN, 2010.
58. Wang, M. Q.; Han, J.; Haq, Z.; Tyner, W. E.; Wu, M.; Elgowainy, A. Energy and greenhouse gas emission effects of corn and cellulosic ethanol with technology improvements and land use changes. Biomass Bioenergy 2011.
59. Goedkoop, M. J.; Heijungs, R.; Huijbregts, M.; De Schryner, A.; Struijs, J.; Van Zelm, R. Recipe 2008, a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level; first edition report i: Characterization; http://www.lcia-recipe.net/: 2009.
60. Bare, J.; Gloria, T.; Norris, G. Development of the method and US normalization database for life cycle impact assessment and sustainability metrics Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40 (16) 5108-5115
61. USGS. Summary of Estimated Water Use in the United States in 2005, Fact Sheet 2009-3098,; U.S. Geological Survey National Center: Reston, VA, 2009.
62. USDA-NRCS. Summary Report: 2007 National Resources Inventory; US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service: Washington, DC, 2009.
63. Wu, M.; Mintz, M.; Wang, M.; Arora, S. Water consumption in the production of ethanol and petroleum gasoline Environ. Manage. 2009, 44 (5) 981-997
64. Mooney, H.; Cropper, A.; Reid, W. Confronting the human dilemma Nature 2005, 434 (7033) 561-562
65. Donner, S. D.; Kucharik, C. J. Corn-based ethanol production compromises goal of reducing nitrogen export by the Mississippi River Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U. S. A. 2008, 105 (11) 4513-4518
66. Kim, J.; Yang, Y.; Bae, J.; Suh, S. The importance of normalization references in interpreting LCA results. J. Ind. Ecol. 2012, submitted.
67. USDA-AMS. Study of Rural Transportation Issues, Chapter 4; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service: Washington, DC, 2010.
68. Kim, S.; Dale, B. E. Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol derived from corn grain via dry milling Biores. Technol. 2008, 99 (12) 5250-5260
69. Mullins, K. A.; Griffin, W. M.; Matthews, H. S. Policy Implications of Uncertainty in Modeled Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Biofuels Environmen. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (1) 132-138