A dominance model for the calculation of decoy products in recommendation environments

AISB 2008 Convention: Communication, Interaction and Social Intelligence - Proceedings of the AISB 2008 Symposium on Persuasive Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 43-50

  Felfernig, A ^a   Gula, B ^a   Leitner, G ^a   Maier, M ^a   Melcher, R ^a   Schippel, S ^a   Teppan, E C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT EFFECTS; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; EMPIRICAL DATA; FINANCIAL SERVICE; INTERNET USERS; PRODUCTS AND SERVICES; TRUST LEVEL; TWO-PRODUCT; USER BEHAVIOUR; USER STUDY;

DECISION MAKING; RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84859257722     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. D. Ariely, T. Wallsten, Seeking subjective dominance in multidimensional space: Anexploration of the asymmetricdominance effect, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 63(3), 223-232, 1995.
2. M. Bhargava, J. Kim, R. Srivastava, Explaining Context Effects on Choice Using a Model of Comparative Judgment, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9( 3), 167-177, 2000.
3. R. Burke, Knowledge-based Recommender Systems. Encyclopedia of Lib. and Information Syst., 69(32), 180-200, 2000.
4. S. Callander, C. H.Wilson, Context-dependent Voting, Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 227-254, 2006.
5. M. Candel, A probabilistic feature model for unfolding tested for perfect and imperfect nestings, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41(4), 414-430, 1997. (Pubitemid 127175556)
6. M. Devetag, From utilities to mental models: A critical survey on decision rules and cognition in consumer choice, CEEL Working Papers 9902, Computable and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia, 1999.
7. R. Dhar, R. Glazer, Similarity in context: Cognitive representations and violations of preference and perceptual invariance in consumer choice, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 67, 280-293, 1996. (Pubitemid 126164517)
8. S. Edgell, W. Geisler, Aset theoretic random utility model of choice behaviour, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 21(3), 265-278, 1980.
9. B. Efron, R. J. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman & Hall, New York, 1993.
10. A. Felfernig, G. Friedrich, D. Jannach, M. Zanker, An Environment for the Development of Knowledge-based Recommender Applications, International Journal of Electronic Commerce (IJEC), 11(2), 11-34, 2006.
11. A. Felfernig, B. Gula, An Empirical Study on Consumer Behaviour in the Interaction with Knowledge-based Recommender Applications, IEEE Joint Conference on E-Commerce Technology (CEC06) and Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce and E-Services (EEE06), San Francisco, California: IEEE Computer Society, 288- 296, 2006.
12. A. Felfernig, B. Gula, G. Leitner, M. Maier, R. Melcher, E.C. Teppan, Persuasion in Knowledge-based Recommendation, to appear in proceedings of Persuasive Technologies 2008, Oulu, Finnland, 2008.
13. G. Häubl, K.B. Murray, Processes of preference construction in agent-assisted online shopping, Online consumer psychology: Understanding and influencing behavior in the virtual world, ISBN- 10: 0805851550, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, 265-286, 2005.
14. G. Häubl, V. Trifts, Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids, Online consumer psychology: Understanding and influencing behavior in the virtual world Marketing Science (19), Special Issue on Marketing Science and the Internet, 4-21, 2000. Table 2. Details of presented cameras in the choice sets.
15. J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, J.Riedl, Explaining Collaborative Filtering Recommendations. Procs. ACM Conf. on CSCW. Pennsylvania, USA, 2000.
16. R. Kivetz, O. Netzer, V. Srinivasan, Alternative Models for Capturing the Compromise Effect, Stanford University, Stanford GSB Research Paper No. 1731(R), 2003.
17. N. Klein, M. Yadav, Context Effects on Effort and Accuracy in Choice: An Enquiry into Adaptive Decision Making The Journal of Consumer Research, (15/4), 411-421, 1989.
18. S. Leven, D. Levine, Multiattribute Decision Making in Context: A Dynamic Neural Network Methodology, Cognitive Science, 1996.
19. J. Masthoff, N. Tintarev, Effective explanations of recommendations: user-centered design, ACM conference on recommender systems, 153-156, 2007. (Pubitemid 351545646)
20. M. Pazzani, D. Billsus. Learning and Revising User Profiles: The Identification of Interesting Web Sites. Machine Learning, (27):313-331, 1997. (Pubitemid 127510033)
21. M. Papagelis, D. Plexousakis, T. Kutsuras, Alleviating the Sparsity Problem of Collaborative Filtering using Trust Interfaces, Trust Management, ISBN: 978-3-540-26042-4, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005.
22. H. Pechtl, Definitions- und Wirkungsbereiche des decoy-Effekts eine empirisch-explorative Untersuchung, Nov. 2004, Diskussionspapier 10/04 ISSN 1437 - 6989.
23. M. Ouyang, Does the Decoy Effect Exist in the Marketplace? - An Examination of the Compromise Effect, Congrés 2004 de l'Association des Sciences Administrative du Canada, 2004.
24. J. Reilly, K. McCarthy, L. McGinty, Smyth, Incremental Critiquing, Knowledge Based Systems, 18(2-3), 143 - 151, 2005.
25. R. R. Roe, J. Busemeyer, T. Townsend, Multi-alternative decision field theory: A dynamic artificial neural network model of decision making, Indiana university, 1999.
26. M. Schweizer, Kontrast- und Kompromisseffekt im Recht am Beispiel der lebenslänglichen Verwahrung, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht, 123 (4)438-457, 2005.
27. I. Simonson, Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects, Journal of Consumer Research (16), 1989.
28. I. Simonson, A. Tversky, Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion, in: Journal of Marketing Research (39), 281- 292, 1992.
29. I. Simonson, A. Tversky, Context-Dependent Preferences, Management Science, 39(10), 1179-1189, 1993.
30. C. Tan, Y. Chan, X. Yang, H. Chan, H. Teo, Effects of Choice Contrast and Order Sequence on Consumer Judgement and Decision in Comparison-Shopping Assisted Environment, Third Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS, 2004.
31. R. Westfall, Psychological Factors in Predicting Product Choice, Journal of Marketing, 26( 2), 1962.